Advertisement

English Literacy Development in Mainland Chinese Secondary English Classrooms: Pedagogical Recommendations for Enhancing Formulaic Language

  • Chen Ding
  • Barry Lee ReynoldsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter concerns the relationship between second language (L2) literacy development and formulaic language instruction for secondary school classrooms in mainland China. It begins by defining L2 literacy and then through a succinct literature review, we discuss the relationship between L2 formulaic knowledge and L2 literacy development (i.e., L2 reading comprehension and L2 writing). Next, we discuss plausible reasons that have hindered Chinese secondary learners’ formulaic language learning. Then, to encourage an increase in formulaic language in Chinese secondary education classrooms, we offer up useful teaching principles and learning activities proposed in previous studies. We feel these principles and activities have the potential to help teachers make informed decisions about what formulaic language should be taught and how they should go about it.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the University of Macau under Grant SRG2016-00079-FED.

References

  1. Compulsory English Curriculum Standard. (2017). Beijing, China: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  2. Fan, M. (2009). An exploratory study of collocational use by ESL students—A task based approach. System, 37(1), 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Garnier, M., & Schmitt, N. (2015). The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 645–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Huang, P.-Y., Wible, D., & Chou, C.-T. (2012). EFL learners’ mental processing of multi-word units. English Teaching & Learning, 36(1), 129–163.Google Scholar
  5. Jiang, J. (2009). Pedagogic materials for L2 collocation use. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language (pp. 99–113). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knell, E. (2018). Role of oral language in the development of L2 literacy skills. In J. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–8). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0238.
  7. Kremmel, B., Brunfaut, T., & Alderson, J. C. (2017). Exploring the role of phraseological knowledge in foreign language reading. Applied Linguistics, 38(6), 848–870.Google Scholar
  8. Kucer, S. B. (2014). Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school settings. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, M. (2002). Implementing the lexical approach. Boston: Thomson Heinle.Google Scholar
  10. Martinez, R., & Murphy, V. A. (2011). Effect of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martinez, R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tsai, K. J. (2015). Profiling the collocation use in ELT textbooks and learner writing. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yu, X. (2009). A formal criterion for identifying lexical phrases: Implication from a classroom experiment. System, 37(4), 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MacauTaipaMacau

Personalised recommendations