Advertisement

The Effectiveness of Tailor-Made Content and Language Integrated Learning Materials for Taiwanese Primary School Students’ Literacy Development

  • Tsui-Ying LinEmail author
  • Wei-Hua Shih
  • Min-Shan Lee
Chapter

Abstract

Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) approach has attracted Taiwanese English teachers’ interests after the latest Taiwan 12-year basic education curriculum reform emphasized developing core competencies through cross-field integration and real-life applications. This chapter describes two pioneering English language teachers’ experiences in tailor-making Arts and Science CLIL materials for improving Taiwanese primary school students’ reading comprehension and writing ability. Then, using the learning objectives as guides, the teachers evaluate the effectiveness of the tailor-made CLIL materials by their helpfulness in improving the students’ reading comprehension and sentence-level writing ability. Last, gained from a focused interview, the chapter concludes with the presentation of the two teachers’ positive viewpoints on creating and applying tailor-made CLIL materials to improve students’ English literacy.

References

  1. Alrabah, S., & Wu, S. H. (2017). Promoting writing competence and positive attitudes among college students in a CLIL English course. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(1), 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coonan, C. M. (2007). Insider views of the CLIL class through teacher self-observation—Introspection. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 625–646.  https://doi.org/10.2167/beb463.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2004). Academic language functions in content and language integrated classrooms: Defining and hypothesizing. Views–Vienna English Working Papers, 13, 23–48.Google Scholar
  5. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching (pp. 139–157). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
  6. Fernández Fontecha, A. (2012). CLIL in the Foreign language classroom: Proposal of a Framework for ICT materials design in language-oriented 60 versions of content and language integrated learning. Alicante Journal of English Studies, 25, 317–334.Google Scholar
  7. Fernández Fontecha, A. (2014). Motivation and gender effect in receptive vocabulary learning: An exploratory analysis in CLIL primary education. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 7(2), 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., Fernández-Costales, A., & Arias Blanco, J. M. (2017). Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: Empirical evidence from Spain. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1294142.
  9. García Esteban, S. (2013). Three frameworks for developing CLIL materials in infant and primary education. Encuentro: revista de investigación e innovación en la clase de idiomas, 22, 49–53.Google Scholar
  10. Ioannou-Georgiou, S., & Pavlou, P. (2011). Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education. Cyprus: Cyprus Pedagogical Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, B., & Chang, K. (2008). An overview of content language integrated learning in Asian countries. Studies in English Education, 13(2), 166–184.Google Scholar
  12. Marsh, D., Coyle, D., Kitanova, S., Maljers, A., Wolff, D., & Bronislawa, Z. (2005). Project D3—CLIL Matrix. The CLIL quality matrix. Central Workshop Report 6/2005. Retrieved from http://archive.ecml.at/mtp2/clilmatrix/pdf/wsrepD3E2005_6.pdf.
  13. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Merisuo-Storm, T. (2006) Development of boys’ and girls’ literacy skills and learning attitudes in CLIL education. In S. Björklund, M. Mård-Mettinen, M. Bergström, & M. Södergård (Eds.), Exploring dual-focussed education: Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs. Vaasa: University of Vaasa. Retrieved from http://www.uwasa.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_952-476-149-1.pdf.
  15. Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tsai, Y. L., & Shang, H. F. (2010). The impact of content-based language instruction on EFL students’ reading performance. Asian Social Science, 6(3), 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vollmer, H. J. (2008). Constructing tasks for content and language integrated learning and assessment. In J. Eckerth & S. Siekmann (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 227–290). Frankfurt and New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  18. Yang, W. (2015). Content and language integrated learning next in Asia: Evidence of learners’ achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zydatiß, W. (2007). Deutsch-englische Züge in Berlin (DEZIBEL): Eine Evaluation des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts an Gymnasien. Kontext, Kompetenzen, Konsequenzen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chaoyang University of TechnologyTaichungTaiwan
  2. 2.Fong Kuo Elementary SchoolTaichungTaiwan
  3. 3.Da Tung Elementary SchoolTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations