Advertisement

Developing Second Language Literacy: Taiwanese College Students’ Error Types in Focused Feedback Effectiveness

  • Chian-Wen KaoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Focused grammar feedback studies (which targeted one or two error types for corrections) have been criticized for investigating the effects of correction mostly on English article errors. This chapter reports results of a new feedback study that expanded the inventory of error types: article use, subject-verb agreement, and verb-noun collocation errors. Results for the immediate posttest writing task showed focused feedback to be effective for two error types: subject-verb agreement and verb-noun collocation. In delayed posttest writing, the feedback benefit was retained only for subject-verb agreement and beyond all expectations, the feedback became effective for article usages. This suggests to writing classroom instructors that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to correct language errors of all sorts.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper. The research reported in this chapter was supported by grant #107-2410-H-263-008-MY2 of Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology.

References

  1. August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2008). Developing reading and writing in second-language learners. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruton, A. (2010). Another reply to Truscott on error correction: Improved situated designs over statistics. System, 38, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Newbury: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, R. (2003). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kao, C. W., & Wible, D. (2014). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of grammar correction in second language writing. English Teaching & Learning, 38, 29–69.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, L. E. (2002). A corpus-based lexical semantic investigation of verb-noun miscollocations in Taiwan learners’ English (Unpublished MA thesis). Tamkang University.Google Scholar
  12. Master, P. (1990). Teaching the English articles as a binary system. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pica, T. (1983). The article in American English: What the textbooks don’t tell us. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 222–233). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  14. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Truscott, J. (2010). Further thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System, 38, 626–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yu, C. L., & Cheng, Y. S. (2017). The effect of focused direct written corrective feedback with metalinguistic explanations on EFL learners’ accurate use of English articles. English Teaching & Learning, 41, 31–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chihlee University of TechnologyNew Taipei CityTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations