Advertisement

Hybrid ESD

  • Shiro OkaEmail author
  • Shinji Tanaka
Chapter

Abstract

Hybrid ESD is defined as the use of a snare EMR at the final stage of the ESD procedure. The indication of these resection methods is the tumors up to 30–40 mm in size, which is difficult to resect by en bloc with snare EMR. In clinical situation, the choice of whether to use a snare and the timing of snaring are depended on the situation during the procedure and the condition of the lesion. The safety and efficacy of hybrid ESD is verified, because these techniques are expected to decrease procedure time and the frequency of perforation.

Keywords

Hybrid ESD Colorectal tumor 

References

  1. 1.
    Kudo S. Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1993;25:455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walsh RM, Ackroyd FW, Shellito PC. Endoscopic resection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:303–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S, et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:100–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:417–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Terasaki M, Tanaka S, Oka S, et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:734–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oka S, Tanaka S, Terasaki M, et al. Hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors. Stomach Intest. 2013;48:185–92; (Japanese in English Abstract)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byeon JS, Yang DH, Kim KJ, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with or without snaring for colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1075–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toyonaga T, Man IM, Morita Y, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus simplified/hybrid ESD. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hong YM, Kim HW, Park SB, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision for the treatment of large sessile polyps and laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Clin Endosc. 2015;48:52–8. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bae JH, Yang DH, Lee S, et al. Optimized hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:584–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okamoto K, Muguruma N, Kagemoto K. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases. Dig Endosc. 2017;29(Suppl 2):45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology and MetabolismHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of EndoscopyHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations