Advertisement

Establishing a Comparative Framework of Tax Incentives for Start-Up Investors

  • Stephen Barkoczy
  • Tamara Wilkinson
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Law book series (BRIEFSLAW)

Abstract

Innovation is critical for economic growth and provides a broad range of spillover benefits for businesses and the broader community. It is therefore not surprising that many governments around the world have been actively involved in formulating polices to stimulate their innovation systems. Governments have focused their attention on a broad range of initiatives, including those specifically targeted at assisting entrepreneurial start-up companies. Start-ups are a key part of a country’s innovation system as they are the source of many new business ideas, products and services. One of the problems with start-ups, however, is that they often struggle to access funding from conventional sources, such as banks, and must therefore rely heavily on venture capital investment to grow their businesses. The reality is that without venture capital investment, many start-ups will languish or fail. In order to stimulate venture capital activity in Australia, the Commonwealth Government, as part of its National Innovation and Science Agenda, recently introduced the Early Stage Investors (ESI) program. The ESI program provides generous tax incentives to angel investors who invest in ‘early stage innovation companies’. The ESI program is loosely modelled on the United Kingdom’s Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) and sits alongside a number of other Australian venture capital tax incentive programs that have been designed to encourage investment in start-ups through specially regulated venture capital funds. This book examines the ESI program and compares and contrasts it with both the United Kingdom’s SEIS and Australia’s other venture capital tax incentive programs. It critically analyses the programs and draws on the comparative analysis to suggest some ways that the ESI program might be reformed to improve the delivery of its policy objectives.

References

  1. Australian Government, Industry Innovation and Competitiveness Agenda – An Action Plan for a Stronger Australia (Report, 2014)Google Scholar
  2. Australian Government, National Innovation and Science Agenda – Welcome to the Ideas Boom (Report, November 2015)Google Scholar
  3. Australian Government, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Office of the Chief Economist, Australian Innovation System Report 2017 (Report, 2017)Google Scholar
  4. Barkoczy, Stephen and Daniel Sandler, Government Venture Capital Incentives: A Multi-Jurisdiction Comparative Analysis (Australian Tax Research Foundation, 2007)Google Scholar
  5. Barkoczy, Stephen, Tamara Wilkinson, Ann Monotti and Mark Davison, Innovation and Venture Capital Law and Policy (Federation Press, 2016)Google Scholar
  6. Brechbühl, Beat A and Bob Wooder, ‘General Report’ in Beat A Brechbühl and Bob Wooder (eds), Global Venture Capital Transactions: A Practical Approach (Kluwer Law International, 2004)Google Scholar
  7. Business.gov.au, Entrepreneurs’ Programme (30 October 2018) <https://www.business.gov.au/assistance/entrepreneurs-programme>
  8. Decker, Ryan, John Haltiwanger, Ron Jarmin, and Javier Miranda, ‘The Role of Entrepreneurship in US Job Creation and Economic Dynamism’ (2014) 28(3) Journal of Economic Perspectives 3Google Scholar
  9. Diaz-Moriana, Vanessa, and Colm O’Gorman, ‘Informal Investors and the Informal Venture Capital Market in Ireland’ (2013) 3(6) Journal of Asian Scientific Research 630Google Scholar
  10. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, State of the Innovation Union 2015 (European Commission Report, 2015)Google Scholar
  11. Edler, Jakob and Jan Fagerberg, ‘Innovation Policy: What, Why and How’ (2017) 33(1) Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2Google Scholar
  12. European Commission, ‘Effectiveness of Tax Incentives for Venture Capital and Business Angels to Foster the Investment of SMEs and Start-ups: Final Report’ (Working Paper No 68, European Commission, June 2017)Google Scholar
  13. Lerner, Josh, Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed – and What to Do About It (Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
  14. OECD, Financing High-Growth Firms – The Role of Angel Investors (OECD, 2011)Google Scholar
  15. OECD, Innovation and Growth: Rationale for an Innovation Strategy (Report, 2007)Google Scholar
  16. Scheela, William, Edmundo Isidro, Thawatchai Jittrapanun and Nguyen Thi Thu Trang, ‘Formal and Informal Venture Capital Investing in Emerging Economies in Southeast Asia’ (2015) 32(3) Asia Pacific Journal of Management 597Google Scholar
  17. Spender, John-Christopher, Vincenzo Corvello, Michele Grimaldi and Pierluigi Rippa, ‘Startups and Open Innovation: A Review of the Literature’ (2017) 20(1) European Journal of Innovation Management 4Google Scholar
  18. StartupAUS, Crossroads 2015 – An Action Plan to Develop a Vibrant Tech Startup Ecosystem in Australia (Report, 2015)Google Scholar
  19. StartupAUS, Crossroads – An Action Plan to Develop a Vibrant Tech Startup Ecosystem in Australia (Report, 2016)Google Scholar
  20. StartupAUS, Crossroads: An Action Plan to Develop a World-Leading Tech Startup Ecosystem in Australia (Report, 2017)Google Scholar
  21. Treasury and Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, Review of Venture Capital and Entrepreneurial Skills (Final Report, 2012)Google Scholar
  22. Treasury Laws Amendment (2018 Measures No. 2) Bill 2018 (Cth)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Barkoczy
    • 1
  • Tamara Wilkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations