Advertisement

DEEP: Detection of Environmental Pollution Using Cooperative Neural Network

  • Yang ZhangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 517)

Abstract

High-accuracy detection of environmental pollution (DEEP) schemes to measure a variety of pollutants arouses great interests in industry and research communities. This paper proposes a novel DEEP approach to improve the detection precision by using machine learning theory in which an RBF network for detection is optimized by genetic algorithm. Specifically, this cooperative scheme employs more appropriate relationship in the networks, which can accelerate the convergence of the algorithm and also can enhance the precision. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms conventional schemes in terms of environmental pollution detection accuracy, as well as monitoring different pollutants.

Keywords

Detection of environmental pollution (DEEP) Radial basis function network Genetic algorithm 

References

  1. 1.
    Holeovský, J., Šampulová, M., Michálek, J.: Semiparametric outlier detection in nonstationary times series: case study for atmospheric pollution in Brno, Czech Republic. Atmos. Pollut. Res. (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parliament, E., Union, C.O.: Directive 2008/50/ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 may 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Off. J. Eur. Communities, 1–43 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saldiva, P.H.N., Künzli, N., Lippmann, M.: Air quality guidelines: global update 2005. Particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Indian J. Med. Res., 492–493 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, H., Wang, J., Zhou, X., et al.: Cooperative VLC systems for data transmission and environment perception. In: 2017 9th IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), pp. 624–629. Guangzhou (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kar, J., et al.: Detection of pollution outflow from Mexico City using CALIPSO lidar measurements. Remote. Sens. Environ. 169, 205–211 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hrdliková, Z., Michálek, J., Kolář, M., Veselý, V.: Identification of factors affecting air pollution by dust aerosol PM in Brno City, Czech Republic. Atmos. Environ., 8661–8673 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nichani, S.: System or method for identifying contents of a semi-opaque envelope. US patent, US5970166 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buschjäger, S., Morik, K.: Decision tree and random forest implementations for fast filtering of sensor data. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Regul. Pap. 65(1), 209–222 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, B.-S., Lee, B.-K., Peng, S.-C.: Maximum likelihood parameter estimation of F-ARIMA processes using the genetic algorithm in the frequency domain. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50(9), 2208–2220 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., Teh, Y.W.: A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 18(7), 1527–1554 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Wireless OptimizationChina Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd.BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations