Advertisement

Image Segmentation of LBF Model with Variable Coefficient Regularized Area Term

  • Liyan WangEmail author
  • Jing Liu
  • Yulei Jiang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 516)

Abstract

In this paper, an improved LBF model based on local regional information is proposed for image segmentation. The basic idea is to add the regularized area term to the energy function of the LBF model and establish a variable coefficient with adaptive capability composed of image regional information. Compared with the LBF model, the proposed model increases the driving force of the evolution curve, making the result better when dealing with the images with weak boundaries and intensity inhomogeneity. At the same time, it effectively solves the problem that the LBF model is sensitive to the initial position and size of the evolution curve. This model is used to segment medical images with complex topological structure and intensity inhomogeneity. Experimental results show that regardless of the initial curve of any position or any size, it has little influence on the segmentation result; moreover, the localization of deep-depressed image boundaries is more accurate, so we get the conclusion that the new model has corresponding improvements in segmentation accuracy and robustness.

Keywords

LBF model Medical image segmentation Intensity inhomogeneity Level-set method Model adaptability 

References

  1. 1.
    Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G. Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vis. 1997;22(1):61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu C, Prince JL. Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7(3):359–69.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li C, Xu C, Gui C, Fox MD. Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 1; 2005. p. 430–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li C, Xu C, Gui C, Fox MD. Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2010;19(12):3243–54.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li C, Kao CY, Gore JC, Ding Z. Minimization of region-scalable fitting energy for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008;17(10):1940–9.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li C, Kao CY, Gore JC, Ding Z. Implicit active contours driven by local binary fitting energy. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2007. p. 1–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopolos D. Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis. 1988;1(4):321–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malladi R, Sethian JA, Vemuri BC. Shape modeling with front propagation: a level set approach. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1995;17(2):158–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao S, Bui TD. Image segmentation and selective smoothing by using mumford-shah model. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2005;14(10):1537–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sedlák J, Morávek J. Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Commun Pure Appl Math. 2010;42(5):577–685.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan TF, Vese LA. Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2001;10(2):266–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsDalian Maritime UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations