Advertisement

Non-uniform Sampling Scheme Based on Low-Rank Matrix Approximate for Sparse Photoacoustic Microscope System

  • Ting LiuEmail author
  • Yongsheng Zhao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 516)

Abstract

Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM) has rapidly emerging as tool for label-free morphology and function imaging of the microvasculature in vivo with a high resolution. However, it is difficult to achieve real-time imaging due to the limitation of data acquisition time. Therefore, a sparse PAM (SPAM) has been proposed to obtain a high-resolution PAM image with relatively low sampling density. In order to successfully set up a SPAM system, the two key problems that we need to keep focus on are designation of the compressive sampling scheme and the corresponding image recovery algorithm. Typically, a random uniform sampling scheme is adopted. In this paper, a non-uniform sampling scheme based on low-rank matrix approximate is proposed to replace the conventional point-by-point scanning scheme to implement fast data acquisition. The effectiveness of the proposed non-uniform scanning scheme is validated using both numerical analysis and PAM experiments. As compliments for SPAM system, the total sampling points are dramatically decreased for a relatively high-resolution PAM vascular image and to implement accelerated data acquisition. Thus, OR-PAM is of great potential to find board biomedical applications in the pathophysiology studies of tumor and treatments for anti-angiogenesis.

Keywords

Tumor angiogenesis Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy Low-rank matrix approximate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3132017127).

References

  1. 1.
    Weis SM, Cheresh DA. Tumor angiogenesis: molecular pathways and therapeutic targets. Nat Med. 2011;17:1359–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 2011;473:298–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lin R, Chen J, Wang H, et al. Longitudinal label-free optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy of tumor angiogenesis in vivo. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015;5(1):23–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albini A, Tosetti F, Li VW, Noonan DM, Li WW. Cancer prevention by targeting angiogenesis. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:498–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emblem KE, Mouridsen K, Bjornerud A, Farrar CT, Jennings D, Borra RJ, Wen PY, Ivy P, Batchelor TT, Rosen BR, Jain RK, Sorensen AG. Vessel architectural imaging identifies cancer patient responders to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat Med. 2013;19:1178–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haubner R, Beer AJ, Wang H, Chen X. Positron emission tomography tracers for imaging angiogenesis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:S86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maslov K, Zhang HF, Hu S, Wang LV. Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo imaging of single capillaries. Opt Lett. 2008;33:929–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao B, Li L, Maslov K, Wang L. Hybrid-scanning optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo vasculature imaging. Opt Lett. 2010;35:1521–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lihong VW, Liang G. Photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography: from bench to bedside. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;16:155–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhenghua W, Mingjian S, Qiang W, Ting L, Naizhang F, Jie L, Yi S. Photoacoustic microscopy image resolution enhancement via directional total variation regularization. Chin Opt Lett. 2014;12(12):121701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu T, Sun M, Meng J, et al. Compressive sampling photoacoustic microscope system based on low rank matrix completion. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2016;26:58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meng J, Wang LV, Ying L, Liang D, Song L. Compressed-sensing photoacoustic computed tomography in vivo with partially known support. Opt Express. 2012;20:16510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liang J, Gao L, Li C, Wang LV. Spatially Fourier-encoded photoacoustic microscopy using a digital micro mirror device. Opt Lett. 2014;39:430–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Provost J, Lesage F. The application of compressed sensing for photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28(4):585–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liang D, Zhang HF, Ying L. Compressed sensing photoacoustic imaging based on random optical illumination. Int J Funct Inform Pers Med. 2009;2:394.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu X, Dong P, Wei G, Xibo M, Xin Y, Jie T. Compressed sensing photoacoustic imaging based on fast alternating direction algorithm. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:1–8.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo Z, Li C, Song L, et al. Compressed sensing in photoacoustic tomography in vivo. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15(2):021311–021311-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun M, Feng N, Shen Y, et al. Photoacoustic imaging method based on arc-direction compressed sensing and multi-angle observation. Opt Express. 2011;19(16):14801–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meng J, Wang LV, Liang D, Song L. In vivo optical-resolution photoacoustic computed tomography with compressed sensing. Opt Lett. 2012;37:4573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meng J, Liu CB, Zheng JX, Lin RQ, Song L. Compressed sensing based virtual-detector photoacoustic microscopy in vivo. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19:036003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhenghua W, Mingjian S, Qiang W, Naizhang F, Yi S. Compressive sampling photoacoustic tomography based on edge expander codes and TV regularization. Chin Opt Lett. 2014;12(10):101102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu Z, Wang Q, Liu J, Sun M, Shen Y. Compressive sensing theory based on edge expander graphs. Acta Autom Sin. 2014;12:2824–35.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li W, Lei Z, Zhijie L, Duanqing X, Dongming L. Non-local image inpainting using low-rank matrix completion: non-local image inpainting using low-rank matrix completion. Comput Graph Forum. 2014;00:1–12.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu T, Sun M, Feng N, et al. Non-uniform sampling photoacoustic microscope system based on low rank matrix completion. In: Instrumentation & measurement technology conference. IEEE; 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Control Science and EngineeringDalian Maritime UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations