Advertisement

Assessment of Health Risks Among Tractor Operators Due to Whole-Body Vibration

  • Kuljit SinghEmail author
  • Jagjit Singh RandhawaEmail author
  • Parveen Kalra
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

Exposure of human operator to whole-body vibration generated from tractors has been associated with low back pain (LBP) and degeneration of intervertebral disc. Researchers related the ischial tuberosities with the theory of evenly distributed pressure and found that pressure at the ischials decreased when the seat is more comfortable. This paper concentrates on the assessment of prevalence of MSDs and related ill effects among tractor operators and non-tractor operators during driving. The study was carried out on 80 active operators, out of which 40 (50%) were tractor operators and 40 (50%) were nontractor operators. All the participants were aged between 20 and 50 years old and taken from the region of Punjab, India. The results revealed that tractor operators reported more health-related problems (LBP, neck pain and shoulder pain, etc.) in comparison to non-tractor operators. Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms,i.e. LBP in 70% of operator, neck pain in 60% of operator and shoulder pain in 43% of operator were greatest among tractor operators. It can be concluded that tractor operators are more prone to MSDs occurred due to WBV. Thus, providing a cushion on the seat during operation may cause operation more comfortable and the operator may experience less prevalence of LBP, neck pain and shoulder pain. Further, this paper concentrates on the assessment of ride comfort and related ill effect among tractor operators, those who use cushion and not use cushion on the seat. The second phase of study was done on 40 tractor operators, out of which 25 (62.5%) tractor operators use cushion on tractor seat and 15 tractor operators (37.5%) did not use cushion on the seat. Most of the tractor operators stated that cushion on the seat is more supportive and also give them more comfort. The result also indicated that the tractor operators, who used cushion on the seat, reported less health-related problems (LBP, neck pain and shoulder pain, etc.). Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms were greatest, i.e. LBP (87%), neck pain (87%) and upper back pain (33%) among those tractor operators who did not use cushion on the seat during driving. It was found that cushions made of any fabric material are better than cushionless driving seat. Thus, it can be concluded that tractor operators who used cushion on the seat during driving were more comfortable and experience less prevalence of LBP, neck pain and upper back pain.

Nomenclature

WBV

Whole-Body Vibration

LBP

Low Back Pain

MSD

Musculoskeletal Disorder

References

  1. 1.
    Boshuizen, H.C., Bongers, P.M., Hulshof, C.T.: Self reported back pain in fork-lift truck and freight container tractor operators exposed to whole-body vibration 17(1), 56–65 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bovenzi, M., Zadini, A.: Self reported low back symptoms in urban bus operators exposed to whole body vibration. Spine 17, 1048–1059 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cvetanovic, B., Zlatkovic, D.: Evaluation of whole body vibration risk in agricultural tractor operators. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 19(5), 1155–1160 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Futatsuka, M., Maeda, S., Inaoka, T., Nagano, M., Shono, M., Miyakita, T.: Whole-body vibration and health effects in the agricultural machinery operators. Ind. Health 36(2), 127–132 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffin, M.J.: Handbook of Human Vibration. ISO, Academic Press, London (1978); Guide for the Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole Body Vibration, ISO 2631-1978(E), 2nd Edn. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kennes, P., Anthonis, Clijmans L., Ramon, H.: Construction of a portable test rig to perform experimental modal analysis on mobile agricultural machinery. J. Sound Vib. 228(2), 421–441 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kittusamy, K., Buchholz, B.: An ergonomic evaluation of excavating operations: a pilot study. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 16, 723–726 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koley, S., Sharma, L., Kaur, S.: Effects of occupational exposure to whole body vibration in tractors operators with low back pain in Punjab. Anthropologist 12(3), 183–187 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sam, B., Kathirvel, K.: Vibration characteristics of walking and riding type power tillers. Bio Syst. Eng. 95(4), 517–528 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scarlett, J., Price, S., Stayner, M.: Whole-body vibration: evaluation of emission and exposure levels arising from agricultural tractors. J. Terra-Mech. 44, 65–73 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seidel, H.: Selected health risks caused by long-term, whole-body vibration. Am. J. Ind. Med. 23(4), 589–604 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Varghese, M., Kumar, A., Mohan, D., Mahajan, P.: A biomechanical and MRI analysis of back pain among operators exposed to tractor vibrations. In: International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, pp. 1–8 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waters, T., Genaidy, A., Barriera, H., Makola, M.: The impact of operating heavy equipment vehicles on lower back disorders. Ergonomics 51, 602–636 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Production and Industrial EngineeringPunjab Engineering College (Deemed to be University)ChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations