Advertisement

Attitudes Towards Forced Displacement in West Bengal, India: To Move (Again) or Not?

  • Saumik PaulEmail author
  • Vengadeshvaran Sarma
Chapter

Abstract

There has been a dearth of studies on the factors that incentivize people to move, willingly, much less on those who were already forced to move. Learning from the forced displacement experiences of those in the vicinity of the Falta Special Economic Zone (FSEZ) in West Bengal, India, this study identifies factors that contribute to the willingness to (re-)move. This study uses data generated from a unique household survey administered around the FSEZ region, where people who were already forced to move and those who were not were consulted on their willingness to relocate. We find support for residential land transfer to be stronger among those with property rights, but stronger social capital and current wealth dampen it. Overall, the propensity to move and expectations for compensation are lower for those with prior displacement experiences.

Keywords

Industrialization Special Economic Zones Displacement Land grab West Bengal India 

References

  1. Aggarwal, A. (2012). Social and economic impact of SEZs in India. New Delhi: OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardhan, P. (2011, April). Land acquisition: Currently a major stumbling block for development policy. Development Outreach. World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, O., & McDowell, C. (2012). Displaced: The human cost of development and resettlement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cernea, M. M. (1988). Involuntary resettlement in development projects: Policy guidelines in World Bank-financed projects. World Bank Technical Paper No. 80. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  5. Garikapati, S. (2005). Consulting the development-displaced regarding their resettlement: Is there a way? Journal of Refugee Studies, 18(3), 340–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gasper, D. (2015). The ethics of economic development and human displacement. In G. F. DeMartino & D. N. McCloskey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of professional economic ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ghatak, M., Mitra, S., Mookherjee, D., & Nath, A. (2013). Land acquisition and compensation in Singur: What really happened? Economic and Political Weekly, 48(21), 32–44.Google Scholar
  8. Ghatak, M., & Mookherjee, D. (2011). Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers. Working Paper No. 2011, 35. World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
  9. Ghatak, M., & Mookherjee, D. (2014). Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers. Journal of Development Economics, 110, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2012). Trade unions and special economic zones in India. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  11. Lam, C., Paul, S., & Sarma, V. (2016). Reversal of fortune? The long-term effect of conservation-led displacement in Nepal. Oxford Development Studies, 44(4), 401–419.Google Scholar
  12. Levien, M. (2011). Special economic zones and accumulation dispossession in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(4), 454–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paul, S., & Sarma V. (2013). The livelihood effects of industrialization on displaced households: Evidence from Falta Special Economic Zone, West Bengal. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 13-083, Centre for European Economic Research.Google Scholar
  14. Sarkar, A. (2007). Development and displacement: Land acquisition in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(16), 1435–11442.Google Scholar
  15. Searle, R. (2010). Making space for capital: The production of global landscapes in contemporary India. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  16. Shah, A. (2013). Mainstreaming or marginalisation?: Evidence from special economic zones in Gujarat. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(41), 55–61.Google Scholar
  17. Shalti Research Group. (2008). SEZ in West Bengal: Growth trajectory impact. Kolkata, India: Shalti Samiti.Google Scholar
  18. Suchitra, S. (2007). SEZs: Economic or exploitation zones?. InfoChange News & Features. Retrieved October 17, 2015, from http://infochangeindia.org/agenda/cost-of-liberalisation/sezs-economic-or-exploitation-zones.html
  19. World Bank. (2007). India: Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI)TokyoJapan
  2. 2.University of NottinghamSemenyihMalaysia

Personalised recommendations