Advertisement

Performance Evaluation of MANETs Routing Protocols in Non-uniform Node Density Topology

  • Mohammed A. MahdiEmail author
  • Tat-Chee Wan
  • Rosni Abdullah
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 547)

Abstract

This paper studies three reactive mobile ad hoc routing protocols, Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP) to compare their performance in Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) environments with varying (non-uniform) node density. For this purpose the efficiency of each protocol was analyzed to verify their behavior in non-uniform node density environments to determine the protocol which is more efficient on the basis of average end to end delay and normalized routing load (NRL). Network Simulation (NS-2) is applied to evaluate the protocols performances. The experiment results show that: CBRP protocol outperformed DSR and AODV in terms NRL when traffic sources greater than 20 sources and AODV outperforms DSR and CBRP in terms Average Delay for all traffic sources where AODV achieved the lowest delay. In addition, when node speed increases, the performance of (AODV, DSR and CBRP) protocols decreases.

Keywords

Routing protocols Non-uniform MANET CBRP AODV DSR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank National Advanced IPV6 (NAV6) Centre, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia for its financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Stojmenovic, I.: Handbook of Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing. Wiley, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boukerche, A., et al.: Routing protocols in ad hoc networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. 55(13), 3032–3080 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Royer, E.M., Toh, C.-K.: A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Pers. Commun. 6(2), 46–55 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bendale, L.M., Jain, R.L., Patil, G.D.: Study of various routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc networks. Int. J. Sci. Res. Netw. Secur. Commun. 06(01), 5–15 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nilsson, A.: Performance analysis of traffic load and node density in ad hoc networks. In: Fifth European Wireless Conference on Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3G. Barcelona, Spain (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahdi, M.A., Wan, T.-C.: Performance evaluation of single-path and multipath MANETs routing protocols for dense and sparse topology. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Comput. Syst. (IJSECS) 3, 31–42 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    AL-Dhief, F.T., et al.: MANET routing protocols evaluation: AODV, DSR and DSDV perspective. In: MUCET-2017. PARKROYAL Resort, George Town, Malaysia (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, D., Hu, Y., Maltz, D.: The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4. IETF RFC 4728 (February 2007) (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fauzia, S., Fatima, K.: Performance evaluation of AODV routing protocol for free space optical mobile ad-hoc networks. In: Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications, Springer International Publishing (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, J.Y., Xie, L.F., Chong, P.H.J.: A performance comparison of flat and cluster based routings in mobile ad hoc networks. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 19, 122–137 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Royer, E., Smith, P.M., Moser, L.: An analysis of the optimum node density for ad hoc mobile networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, Helsinki, Finland (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Natsheh, E.: Impact of varying offered data load on density-based routing in mobile ad-hoc networks. DLINE 6, 87–109 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    NS2, NS2 Network Simulator 2: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ (2017). Access date 25 July 2017
  14. 14.
    Mahdi, M.A., Wan, T.C.: Performance comparison of MANETs routing protocols for dense and sparse topology. In: ICICN, pp. 37–41. IACSIT Press, Singapore (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed A. Mahdi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tat-Chee Wan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rosni Abdullah
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.National Advanced IPV6 (NAV6) CentreUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Computer SciencesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations