Advertisement

Design and Development of Technology Appropriate for Rural Community to Address Sustainability

  • Bibhuti Ranjan BhattacharjyaEmail author
  • Saurav Sarmah
  • Sashindra Kumar Kakoty
Conference paper
Part of the Design Science and Innovation book series (DSI)

Abstract

In this article, a special case of Rural Technology Action Group (RuTAG) is illustrated, where a cost-effective and easily adaptable feed block production machine is designed to make it suitable for rural community and strengthen the rural economy of India. A case study is presented to establish a conceptual link between RuTAG, inclusive innovation and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Here, we have enunciated two hypotheses; Hypotheis1: RuTAG is creating an inclusive innovation platform, Hypothesis 2: RuTAG’s initiatives are fostering implementation of SDGs. Based on a case study approach, we will try to verify both the hypothesis. The study is expected to bring new perspective to policymakers in India as well as other developing nations for future planning in rural technology.

Keywords

Sustainable development goal Resource constraint society Inclusive innovation Rural community 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson J, Markides C (2007) Strategic innovation at the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 49:83–88Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bound K, Thorntan I (2012) Our Frugal Future: lessons from India’s innovation systemGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen JL, Lee CL (2017) Developing sustainable innovative products for the bottom of the pyramid by biometric design concepts. Procedia CRP 61:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan JKH (2018) Design ethics: Reflecting on the ethical dimension of the technology: sustainability, and responsibility in the Anthropocene. Des Stud 54:184–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Das K, Das B (2006) Technology and women in India with special reference to the rural sector. In: XIV international economic history congress, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Das AK (2007) Design Development of an indigenous tricycle rickshaw. PhD thesis, Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deycy JSP, Claes B, Theodorakopoulos N (2016) Transferring intermediate technologies to rural enterprises in developing economies: a conceptual framework. Prometheus 34(2):153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foster C, Heeks R (2015) Policies to support inclusive innovation. Working Paper No. 61. Centre of Development Informatics, Institute for Development Policy and Management, Manchester, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fleming A, Wise RM, Hansen H, Sams L (2017) The sustainable development goals: a case study. Mar Policy 86:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta A (2010) Empathetic innovations: connections across boundaries, working paper series of the Indian Institute of Management AhmedabadGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta A (2012) Innovations for the poor by the poor. Int J Technol Learn Innov Dev 5:28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    George G, MacGahan AM, Prabhu J (2012) Innovation for inclusive growth: towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. J Manag Stud 49(4):661–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Govindarajan V, Trimble C (2012) Reverse innovation: a global growth strategy that could pre-empt disruption at home. Strategy Leadersh 40(5):5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heeks R, Foster C, Nugroho Y (2014) New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innov Dev 4(2):175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Imaz M, Sheinbaum C (2017) Science and technology in the framework of the sustainable development goals. World J Sci Technol Sustain Dev 14(1):2–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jafry T, O’Neill DH (2000) The application of ergonomics in rural development: a review. Appl Ergon 31:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaplinsky R, Chataway J, Hanlin R, Clark N, Kale D, Muraguri L, Papaioannou T, Robbins P, Wamae W (2009) Below the radar: what does innovation in emerging economies have to offer other low-income economies? Int J Technol Manag Sustain Dev 8(3):177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khan R (2016) How frugal innovation promotes social sustainability. Sustainability 8(1034):1–29Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knorringa P, Peša I, Leliveld A, van Beers C (2016) Frugal Innovation and development: aides or adversaries? Eur J Dev Res 28(2):143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar P, Chakrabarti D (2016) Extending the life cycle of under-utilized urban scrap through sustainable design approach. In: Chakrabarti A (ed) Research into design—supporting sustainable product development. Published by Research Publishing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. ISBN: 978-981-08-7721-7Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lucena J, Schneider J, Leyden JA (2010) Engineering and sustainable community development. Synth Lect Eng Technol Soc 5(1):1–230Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mashelkar RA (2008) Indian science, technology, and society: the changing landscape. Technol Soc 30:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murphy HM, McBean EA, Farahbakhsh K (2009) Appropriate technology—a comprehensive approach for water and sanitation in the developing world. Technol Soc 31:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser to Government of India (2006) Report of the working group on effective rural technology delivery (Including partnership with voluntary organizations)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prahlad CK (2010) The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: eradicating poverty through profits, 2nd edn. Pearson education, Upper Sadle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prahalad CK, Mashelkar RA (2010) Innovation’s holy grail. Harv Bus Rev 88:132–141Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prahlad CK (2012) Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. J Prod Innov Manag 29(1):6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pattnaik BK, Dhal D (2015) Mobilizing from appropriate technologies to sustainable technologies based on grassroots innovations. Technol Soc 40:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pansera M, Martinez F (2016) Innovation for development and poverty reduction: an integrative literature review. J Manag Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-02-2015-0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pansera M, Sarkar S (2016) Crafting Sustainable development solutions: frugal innovations of grassroots entrepreneurs. Sustainability 8(51):1–25Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Panser M, Owen R (2018) Framing inclusive innovation within the discourse of development: insights from case studies in India. Res Policy 23–34Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reddy AKN (2004) Science and technology for rural India. Curr Sci Spec Sect Appl S&T Rural Mass 87(7):889–898Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rao CNR (2008) Science and technology policies: the case of India. Technol Soc 30:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rai N, Kumar V (2012) Role of Science and Technology in making rural India shine. IJRDMS 6(1):59–72MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Radjou N, Prabhu J, Ahuja S (2012) Jugaad innovation: think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. Published by Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rosca E, Reedy J, Bendul JC (2018) Eur J Dev Res 30(1):136–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schumacher E (1973) Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people really mattered. Blond and Briggs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Srinivas S, Sutz J (2008) Developing countries and innovations and searching for a new analytical approach. Technol Soc 30:129–140Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sianipar CPM, Yudoko G, Adhiutama A, Dowaki K (2013) Community empowerment through appropriate technology: sustaining the sustainable development. In: The 3rd international conference on sustainable future for human security SUSTAIN 2012, Procedia Environ Sci 17:1007–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (2014) Open working groups proposal for sustainable development goals; SDGs, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shukla S, Mani ND (2015) Role of national R&D institutes in devising novel strategies for empowerment of weaker sections of society in India. J Soc Sci Humanit 1(2):138–145Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schillo RS, Robinson RR (2017) Inclusive innovation in developed countries: the who, what, why, and how, technology innovation. Manag Rev 7(7):34–46Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. (A/RES/70/1)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wood B, Schumacher EF (1984) His life and thought. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wicklein RC, Kachmar CJ (2001) Philosophical rationale for appropriate technology. In: Wicklein RC (ed) Appropriate technology for sustainable living, Council on Technology TeacherGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    ZTM & BPD Unit, ICAR-IARI (2018). http://ztmbpd.iari.res.in/about-us/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bibhuti Ranjan Bhattacharjya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Saurav Sarmah
    • 2
  • Sashindra Kumar Kakoty
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Rural TechnologyIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.North Eastern Development Finance Corporation Ltd.GuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations