Advertisement

Surgimap Spine for Preoperative Surgical Planning in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

  • Xuesong Zhang
  • Wenhao Hu
  • Yan Wang
Chapter

Abstract

Precise preoperative planning is necessary for any surgical procedure to achieve an optimal therapeutic effect. Retrieving spinal alignment, horizontal vision, and global sagittal balance is recognized as the main surgical purpose for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with kyphosis deformity. Some authors have proved that reasonable restoration of sagittal plane is tightly associated with postoperative quality of life [1, 2]. In an attempt to increase clinical effect, we need to optimize postoperative spinal alignment.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith JS, Klineberg EO, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Moal B, Ames CP, Hostin R, Fu KMG, Kebaish KM, Burton DC. Change in classification grade by the Schwab-SRS adult spinal deformity classification and impact on health-related quality of life measures: prospective analysis of operative and nonoperative treatment. Spine. 2012;12:1663.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blondel B, Schwab F, Ungar B, Smith J, Bridwell K, Glassman S, Shaffrey C, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Impact of magnitude and percentage of global sagittal plane correction on health-related quality of life at 2-years follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwab FJ, Patel A, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Farcy JP, Boachie-Adjei O, Hostin RA, Hart RA, Akbarnia BA, Burton DC. Sagittal realignment failures following pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery: are we doing enough?: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:539–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lafage V, Smith JS, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Ames CP, Klineberg E, Arlet V, Hostin R, Burton DC, Shaffrey CI. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment failures following three column thoracic osteotomy for adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:698–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Demakakos J, Fu KM, Keshavarzi S, Li CM, Deviren V, Schwab FJ, Lafage V. Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:862–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Pratpradal D, Legaye J, Duvalbeaupère G, Pélissier J. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:415–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis? Spine. 2006;31:2343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine. 2009;34:1828.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP. Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment. Spine. 2011;36:1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berjano P, Langella F, Ismael MF, Damilano M, Scopetta S, Lamartina C. Successful correction of sagittal imbalance can be calculated on the basis of pelvic incidence and age. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:587–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pigge RR, Scheerder FJ, Smit TH, Mullender MG, van Royen BJ. Effectiveness of preoperative planning in the restoration of balance and view in ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;24:E7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ondra SL, Marzouk S, Koski T, Silva F, Salehi S. Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity. Spine. 2006;31:E973.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Royen BJ, De GA, Smit TH. Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:492.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Le HJ, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S. Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 5):669.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akbar M, Terran J, Ames CP, Lafage V, Schwab F. Use of Surgimap spine in sagittal plane analysis, osteotomy planning, and correction calculation. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013;24:163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu WH, Wang Y. Osteotomy techniques for spinal deformity. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129:2639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:99–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine. 2010;35:2224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Langella F, Villafañe JH, Damilano M, Cecchinato R, Pejrona M, Ismael M, Berjano P. Predictive accuracy of Surgimap™ surgical planning for sagittal imbalance: a cohort study. Spine. 2017;42:E1297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atici Y, Akman YE, Balioglu MB, Kargin D, Kaygusuz MA. Two level pedicle substraction osteotomies for the treatment of severe fixed sagittal plane deformity: computer software-assisted preoperative planning and assessing. Eur Spine J. 2015;25(8):2461–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuesong Zhang
    • 1
  • Wenhao Hu
    • 1
  • Yan Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations