Advertisement

Friction and Wear Properties of Bio-Based Abrasive in a High-Friction Composite Material

  • S. Stephen BernardEmail author
  • Md. Javeed Ahmed
  • J. Dasaprakash
  • M. R. Saroj Nitin
  • S. Vivek
  • G. K. Kannan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The objective of the work is to analyse the function of bio-based abrasive in a high-friction composite materials. Cashew dusts are cheaper when compared to other frictional brake materials which stimulated the idea of exploring their possible incorporation into friction materials. The effect of cashew dust loading on physical, mechanical and tribological properties of brake pad composite is evaluated. Cashew dust is loaded with 0, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20% as an alternate of alumina by varying the pressure and speed in a pin on disc tribometer. By increasing cashew dust content’s heat swell, porosity and specific gravity decrease and also hardness and loss on ignition increase. By increasing the pressure, 8, 12 and 16% shows high friction stability at all speeds. Finally, the effect of environment on the composites was investigated in water, salt water and oil.

Keywords

Cashew dust Wear Friction stability Heat swell SEM 

References

  1. 1.
    El-Tayeb NSM, Liew KW (2008) Effect of water spray on friction and wear behaviour of noncommercial and commercial brake pad materials. Wear 208:135–144Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Han Y, Tian X, Yan Y (2008) Effect of ceramic fiber on the friction performance of automotive brake lining materials. Tribol Trans 51:779–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stephen Bernard S, Jayakumari LS (2014) Effect of the properties of natural resin binder in a high friction composite material. Polimeros- Ciencia Tecnologia 24(2):149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stephen Bernard S, Jayakumari LS (2018) Pressure and temperature sensitivity analysis of Palm fiber as a biobased reinforcement material in brake pad. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Malhotra VM, Valimbe PS, Wright MA (2002) Effects of fly ash and bottom ash on the frictional behaviour of composites. Fuel 81:235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ikpambese KK, Gundu DT, Tuleun LT (2016) Evaluation of Palm Kernel Fibers (PKFs) for production of asbestos-free automotive brake pads. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 28:110–118Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stephen Bernard S (2009) Investigation on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a turbocharged low heat rejection DI diesel engine with extended expansion concept. SAE technical paper 2009-28-0006Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohanty S, Chugh YP (2007) Development of fly ash-based automotive brake lining. Tribol Int 40:1217–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suresh G, Jayakumari LS (2015) Evaluating the mechanical properties of E-Glass fiber/carbon fiber reinforced interpenetrating polymer networks. Polimeros 1:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosa AGDA, Moreto JA, Manfrinato MD, Rossino LS (2015) Study on friction and wear behavior of SAE 1045 steel, reinforced nylon 6.6 and NBR rubber used in clutch disks. Mater Sci 17:1397–1403Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jang H, Lee JS, Fash JW (2001) Compositional effects of the brake friction material on creep groan phenomena. Wear 251:1477–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stephen Bernard S, Jayakumari LS (2016) Effect of rockwool and steel fiber on the friction performance of brake lining materials. Materia- Rio de Janeiro 21:656–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Stephen Bernard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Md. Javeed Ahmed
    • 2
  • J. Dasaprakash
    • 1
  • M. R. Saroj Nitin
    • 1
  • S. Vivek
    • 1
  • G. K. Kannan
    • 3
  1. 1.Rajalakshmi Institute of TechnologyChennaiIndia
  2. 2.B.S Abdur Rahman UniversityVandalurIndia
  3. 3.Chennai Institute of TechnologyKundrathur, ChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations