Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Superelastic Alloy

  • M. Sangeetha
  • P. PonnusamyEmail author
  • Durgajeevitha
  • S. Shiva Ganesh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


This work deals with the fabrication of titanium-free superelastic alloy for mechanical applications, and it summarizes the fabrication of superelastic alloys and various tests conducted on the fabricated specimen. Based on its fabrication and testing, the shape memory alloys are improved in some of the properties such as ultimate tensile strength, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance damping properties. There are various superelastic materials; out of these, nickel titanium is best suited for the medical field since there is a requirement of the annealing process. The honeycomb nickel titanium is the good replacement of steel bar in concrete structures. Copper–nickel–aluminum is best suited for damping purpose, and it is economical due to the absence of titanium. Mechanical applications can make use of titanium-free superelastic alloys due to low cost.


Aluminum Copper Elastic material Mechanical properties Nickel 


  1. 1.
    Kim JH, Kang TJ, Yu WR (2008) Mechanical modeling of a self-expandable stent fabricated using braiding technology. J Biomech 41(15):202–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadrnezhaad SK, Arami H, Keivan H, Khalifezadeh R (2006) Powder metallurgical fabrication and characterization of nanostructured porous NiTi shape-memory alloy. Mater Manuf Process 21:727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bigdeli F (2008) The corrosion behavior of electroless Ni–P–SiC nano-composite coating. Int J Mod Phys B 22:3031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernard S, Krishna Balla V, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A (2012) Compression fatigue behavior of laser processed porous NiTi alloy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 13:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jaureguizahar S, Soul H, Chapetti M, Yawny A (2015) Characterization of fatigue life of ultra-fine grained NiTi superelastic wires under uniaxial loading. Proced Mater Sci 9:326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaureguizahar S, Soul H, Chapetti M, Yawny A (2016) Fatigue of NiTi Shape Memory Wires. Proced Struct Integr 2:1427–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Cocco V, Iacoviello F, Natali S (2016) Fatigue microstructural evaluation in pseudo elastic NiTi alloy. Proced Struct Integr 2:1457–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DesRoches R, Asce M, McCormick J, Delemont M (2004) Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars. J Struct Eng 130:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shaw JA, Grummon DS, Foltz J (2007) Superelastic NiTi honeycombs: fabrication and experiments. Smart Mater Struct 16:S170–S178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukuta T, Iiba M, Kitagawa Y, Sakai Y (2004) Experimental study on stress-strain property of shape memory alloy and its application to self-restoration of structural members. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, Paper No. 610, 1–6 Aug 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sangeetha
    • 1
  • P. Ponnusamy
    • 2
    Email author
  • Durgajeevitha
    • 3
  • S. Shiva Ganesh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringSathyabama Institute of Science and TechnologyChennaiIndia
  2. 2.School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT)VelloreIndia
  3. 3.Vins Christian College of EngineeringNagercoilIndia

Personalised recommendations