Electrochemical Micromachining of Aluminium Alloy Composite

  • S. RameshEmail author
  • V. Subburam
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Electrochemical micromachining (EMM) is in the forefront among the non-traditional machining processes that are brought into micromachining domain. The major influencing factors of EMM process are more sensitive at the micro-level machining, and for achieving precision the right combination of parameters is essential. Continuous research works are required to study and analyse every new possible set of variables that can be applied to carry out this machining process. The objective of the present research work is to generate micro-holes using an aluminium composite workpiece through EMM and study the capability of the process to machine such non-homogenous materials. An EMM set-up developed with pulse power facility for experimental purposes was used to carry out the experiments. The experimentation included an aluminium composite containing ceramic reinforcement as work specimen (anode), a hollow brass electrode as the machining tool and the solution of NaCl (sodium chloride) as the ion-conducting medium (electrolyte) to facilitate the process. The effect of input factors like voltage, current and pulse-on time on response parameters such as machining rate (MR) and overcut (RC) was studied from experimental observations. It was a general observation that speeding up the machining rate with higher level input of parameters affects the accuracy of the process outcome. Generally, the response of the EMM process is slow and requires time to produce machining accuracy.


Electrochemical micromachining Aluminium composite NaCl Machining rate Overcut 


  1. 1.
    Schuster R, Kirchner V, Allongue P, Ertl G (2000) Electrochemical micromachining. Science 289:98–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhattacharya B, DoloiandB Sridhar PS (2001) Electrochemical micro-machining: new possibilities for micro-manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 113:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramarao S, Padmanabhan G (2012) Effect of process variables on metal removal rate in electrochemical machining of Al-B4C composites. Arch Appl Sci Res 1844–1849Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hackert-Oschätzchen M, Lehnert N, Martin A, Schubert A (2016) Jet-electrochemical machining of particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites with different neutral electrolytes. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 118:012036Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalra1 CS, Kumar V, Manna A (2015) Analysis of electrochemical behavior on micro-drilling of cast hybrid Al/(Al2O3pþSiCpþCp)-MMC using micro-ECM process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 232(1):67–79Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Subburam V, Ramesh S, Arunachalam RM, Thanigaivelan R (2013) Effect of acidified electrolyte on the performance of electrochemical micromachining. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on advances in materials processing and characterisation (AMPC 2013), vol II, pp 799–806Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tang L, Yang S (2013) Experimental investigation on the electrochemical machining of 00Cr12Ni9Mo4Cu2 material and multi-objective parameters optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2909–2916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu J, Zhu D, Zhao L, Xu Z (2015) Experimental investigation on electrochemical machining of γ-TiAl intermetallic, 15th machining innovations conference for aerospace industry. Procedia CIRP 35:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schulze HP, Schatzing W (2013) Influences of different contaminations on the electro-erosive and the electrochemical micro-machining. The Seventeenth CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining (ISEM). Procedia CIRP 6:58–63Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKCG College of TechnologyChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPaavai Engineering CollegeNamakkalIndia

Personalised recommendations