Advertisement

Vocabulary Teaching: A Systemic Perspective

  • Yosuke SasaoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 17)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to discuss ways in which soft systems methodology (SSM) may be applied to the field of vocabulary learning and teaching. It begins by addressing the current problematic situation in this field and then attempts to approach the problem by borrowing the transformation processing model from SSM. In this chapter, I argue that teachers may benefit from focusing on fostering students’ vocabulary learning ability which contributes to effective vocabulary learning, rather than their vocabulary knowledge per se, because teachers typically do not have enough time to deal with vocabulary in class. I also suggest that vocabulary instruction should be seen as part of a broader language education system. More specifically, I propose that vocabulary and grammar instruction may be interconnected with each other within the framework of Meaning-order Approach to Pedagogical (MAP) Grammar, and explore ways in which vocabulary is learned effectively for communicative purposes using the MAP Grammar model.

Keywords

Vocabulary Soft systems methodology MAP Grammar Vocabulary learning ability 

References

  1. Barrow, J., Nakanishi, Y., & Ishino, H. (1999). Assessing Japanese college students’ vocabulary knowledge with a self-checking familiarity survey. System, 27, 223–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00018-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498.
  3. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting the Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–261.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr195oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Checkland, P. (1983). O.R. and the systems movement: Mapping and conflicts. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34(8), 661–675.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1983.160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Checkland, P. (1989). An application of soft systems methodology. In L. Rosenhead (Ed.), Rational analysis for a problematical world. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1999). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2016). Evaluating lists of high-frequency words. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167(2), 132–158.  https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00009.sas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29–62.  https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.2.02dan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 75–93). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  11. Goulden, R., Nation, P., & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 341–363.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.4.341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  13. Mochizuki, M., & Aizawa, K. (2000). An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: An exploratory study. System, 28(2), 291–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00013-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. Retrieved May 17, 2018, from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation
  17. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nurweni, A., & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 161–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00005-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sasao, Y. (2013). Diagnostic tests of English vocabulary learning proficiency: Guessing from context and knowledge of word parts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  20. Sasao, Y. (2017). MAP Grammar and vocabulary. In A. Tajino (Ed.), A new approach to English pedagogical grammar: The order of meanings (pp. 128–136). Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sasao, Y. (in press). Measuring the ability to learn words. In S. A. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Sasao, Y., & Webb, S. (2017). The word part levels test. Language Teaching Research, 21(1), 12–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815586083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sasao, Y., & Webb, S. (2018). The guessing from context test. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 114–140.  https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00009.sas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 17–36.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 46(4), 484–503.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tajino, A., James, R., & Kijima, K. (2005). Beyond needs analysis: Soft systems methodology for meaningful collaboration in EAP course design. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tajino, A. (2002). Transformation process models: A systemic approach to problematic team-teaching situation. Prospect, 17(3), 29–33.Google Scholar
  28. Tajino, A., Kanamaru, T., & Sasao, Y. (2015). Bunpousei handan no seikakusa to ryuuchousa eno “Imijun” chishiki no kouka [The effects of the “MAP Grammar” knowledge on accuracy and fluency in grammaticality judgement]. Paper presented at the 159th Higashi Asia Eigo Kyouiku Kenkyukai [English Education in East Asia Research Project], Seinan Gakuin University.Google Scholar
  29. Webb, S. A., & Chang, A. C.-S. (2012). Second language vocabulary growth. RELC Journal, 43(1), 113–126.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212439367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman, Green & Co..Google Scholar
  32. Zechmeister, E. B., Chronis, A. M., Cull, W. L., D’Anna, C. A., & Healy, N. A. (1995). Growth of a functionally important lexicon. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(2), 201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969509547878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Liberal Arts and SciencesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations