Advertisement

Systems Thinking: An ESP Genre Approach

  • Hajime Terauchi
  • Sayako Maswana
Chapter
Part of the Translational Systems Sciences book series (TSS, volume 17)

Abstract

Although there has been increasing pedagogical attention to the English for Specific Purposes (ESP) in Japanese English education, ESP theory, and specifically its concept of genre, is not well understood by teachers and learners. Using some examples, we explain genre models and genre systems as hard systems and suggest that adding the perspective of systemic functional grammar to current ESP teaching and learning practices will be beneficial for English learners. In a genre system, the interconnectivity of genres in terms of discourse communities and language functions is key to understanding that composing elements of genres and language use do not have much meaning as parts but are crucial for the whole. An ESP genre approach not only clarifies English learning objectives but also equips learners with the skills to analyze genre text and to make sense of complex discourse realities. We argue that in ESP classrooms, a soft systems methodology helps reveal different perceptions held by stakeholders, and an ESP genre-based approach can be applied to improve a problematic situation in ESP classrooms based on a soft systems framework.

Keywords

ESP Genre Discourse community Systemic functional grammar Genre system 

References

  1. Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  2. Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica, 4, 3–19.Google Scholar
  3. Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  4. Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2013). The functional analysis of English (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, A. (2008). Analyzing genre exemplars in preparation for writing: The case of an L2 graduate student in the ESP genre-based instructional framework of academic literacy. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 50–71.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyland, K. (2017). English in the disciplines: Arguments for specificity. ESP Today, 5(1), 5–23.  https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2017.5.1.1.
  11. Iijima, Y., Watanabe, A., Maswana, S., Watari, H., Hori, S., Takahashi, S., Kanamaru, T., Tajino, A., & Terauchi, H. (2016). The current state and issues of academic English curricula in Japanese universities: Findings of a survey study. Kyoto University Researches in Higher Education, 22, 95–98.Google Scholar
  12. Lado, R. (1964). Language teaching: A scientific approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Martin, J. R. (1999). Modelling context: A crooked path of progress in contextual linguistics. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics (pp. 25–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  14. Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N., & Ranta, E. (2010). English as an academic lingua franca: The ELFA project. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), 183–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Noguchi, J. (1997). Materials development for English for specific purposes: Applying genre analysis to EFL pedagogy. English Teaching, 52(3), 303–318.Google Scholar
  17. Noguchi, J. (2003). Teaching ESP writing: OCHA in a CALL class. Cybermedia Forum, 4. Retrieved from http://www.cmc.osaka-u.ac.jp/publication/for-2003/40-45.html
  18. Noguchi, J. (2009). The CALL classroom as a window to systemic literacy. Cybermedia Forum, 10, 17–21.Google Scholar
  19. Noguchi, J. (2015). Secondary English education in Japan: An overview and a preview. In B. Spolsky & K. Sung (Eds.), Secondary school English education in Asia (pp. 33–46). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Noguchi, J. (2017). Rikei ESP no ELF kyoyoudo syakudo no teian [A proposal of ELF tolerance scale for science ESP]. In Y. Nishina, N. Nakanishi, & M. Terui (Eds.), Ouyou gengogaku no saizensen [The frontline of applied linguistics] (pp. 1–10). Tokyo: Kinseido.Google Scholar
  21. Noguchi, J., Miyama, A., & Okamoto, M. (2007). Rikei eigo no raityingu [English writing for science majors]. Tokyo: ALC Press.Google Scholar
  22. Orlikowski, W., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(4), 541–574.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Swales, J. M. (2016). Reflections on the concept of discourse community. ASp, 69, 7–19.  https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.4774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tajino, A., James, R., & Kijima, K. (2005). Beyond needs analysis: Soft systems methodology for meaningful collaboration in EAP course design. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tajino, A., & Suiko, M. (2005). Daigaku eigo kyouiku eno teigen: Karikyuramu kaihatsu eno shisutemu apuroochi [A proposal for university English language education: A systems approach to curriculum development]. In Y. Takefuta & M. Suiko (Eds.), Korekara no daigaku eigo kyouiku [The future of university English language education] (pp. 1–46). Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
  28. Tardy, C. M. (2003). A genre system view of the funding of academic research. Written Communication, 20(1), 7–36.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Terauchi, H. (2001). English for academic legal purposes in Japan. Tokyo: Liber Press.Google Scholar
  30. Terauchi, H., Fujita, R., & Naito, H. (Eds.). (2015). Essential English for business meetings. Tokyo: Asahi Press.Google Scholar
  31. Terauchi, H., & Maswana, S. (2018). MAP Grammar and ESP: Beyond the classroom. In A. Tajino (Ed.), A new approach to English pedagogical grammar: The order of meanings (pp. 65–72). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Terauchi, H., Yamauchi, H., Noguchi, J., & Sasajima, S. (Eds.). (2010). ESP in the 21st century: ESP theory and application today. Tokyo: Taishukan shoten.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hajime Terauchi
    • 1
  • Sayako Maswana
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of CommerceTakachiho UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Foreign Language StudiesMejiro UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations