Advertisement

Epiretinal Membranes and Macular Pseudoholes

  • Jen-Hsiang Shen
  • Wei-Chi Wu
  • Chi-Chun Lai
Chapter
Part of the Retina Atlas book series (RA)

Abstract

Epiretinal membrane usually occurs in patients over 50 years old and could be seen in 10–30% of the general population over 70 years old. Bilateral involvement is present in 20% of these patients. Eighty percent of these membranes are idiopathic, while about 20% are secondary to previous retinal detachment, vascular, or inflammatory retinal diseases [1–5].

References

  1. 1.
    Dupas B, Tadayoni R, Gaudric A. Epiretinal membranes. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015;38(9):861–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fraser-Bell S, Guzowski M, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Mitchell P. Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klein R, Klein BE, Wang Q, Moss SE. The epidemiology of epiretinal membranes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:403–30.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mitchell P, Smith W, Chey T, Wang JJ, Chang A. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes. The Blue Mountains Eye Study, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):1033–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheard RM, Sethi C, Gregor Z. Acute macular pucker. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(6):1178–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Appiah AP, Hirose T, Kado M. A review of 324 cases of idiopathic premacular gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;106:533–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sidd RJ, Fine SL, Owens SL, Patz A. Idiopathic preretinal gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:44–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iwanoff A. Beitraege zur normalen und pathologischen Anatomie des Auges: A. Zur pathologischen Anatomie der Retina. B. Zur normalen und pathologischen Anatomie des Glaskoerpers. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1865;11:135–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Michels RG. A clinical and histopathologic study of epiretinal membranes affecting the macula and removed by vitreous surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1982;80:580–656.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bellhorn MB, Friedman AH, Wise GN, et al. Ultrastructure and clinicopathologic correlation of idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79:366–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foos RY. Ultrastructural features of posterior vitreous detachment. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1975;196:103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dellaporta A. Macular pucker and peripheral retinal lesions. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1973;71:329–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laqua H. Pigmented macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;86:56–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robertson DM, Buettner H. Pigmented preretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;83:824–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gass JD. Stereoscopic atlas of macular diseases: diagnosis and treatment. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co; 1977. p. 344–66.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hejsek L, Stepanov A, Dohnalova A, Rehakova T, Jiraskova N. The natural evolution of idiopathic epimacular membrane. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2017;161(1):100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klein BR, Hiner CJ, Glaser BM, et al. Fundus photographic and fluorescein angiographic characteristics of pseudoholes of the macula in eyes with epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:768–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Allen AW Jr, Gass JD. Contraction of a perifoveal epiretinal membrane simulating a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;82(5):684–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haouchine B, Massin P, Tadayoni R, et al. Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:732–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gupta P, Sadun AA, Sebag J. Multifocal retinal contraction in macular pucker analyzed by combined optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Retina. 2008;28(3):447–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Odrobina D, et al. Non-full-thickness macular holes reassessed with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2012;32:922–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foos RY. Vitreoretinal juncture over retinal vessels. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1977a;204:223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foos RY. Vitreoretinal juncture: epiretinal membranes and vitreous. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977b;16:416–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burke JM, Sipos E, Cross HE. Cell proliferation in response to vitreous hemoglobin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;20:575–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burke JM, Smith JM. Retinal proliferation in response to vitreous hemoglobin or iron. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;20:582–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lobes LA Jr, Burton TC. The incidence of macular pucker after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;85:72–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Francois J, Verbraeken H. Relationship between the drainage of the subretinal fluid in retinal detachment surgery and the appearance of macular pucker. Ophthalmologica. 1979;179:111–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hagler WS, Aturaliya U. Macular puckers after retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1971;55:451–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tanenbaum HL, Schepens CL, Elzeneiny I, et al. Macular pucker following retinal detachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1970;83:286–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Daicker B, Guggenheim R. Studies on fibrous and fibro-glial surface wrinkling retinopathy by scanning electron microscopy. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1978;207:229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kampik A, Kenyon KR, Michels RG, et al. Epiretinal and vitreous membranes: comparative study of 56 cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:1445–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yazici AT, Alagöz N, Celik HU, et al. Idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membranes: do they differ in terms of morphology? An optical coherence tomography-based study. Retina. 2011;31(4):779–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poliner LS, Olk RJ, Grand MG, Escoffery RF, Okun E, Boniuk I. Surgical management of premacular fibroplasia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(6):761–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gaudric A, Aloulou Y, Tadayoni R, et al. Macular pseudoholes with lamellar cleavage of their edge remain pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:733–42, 742.e1-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schumann RG, Compera D, Schaumberger MM, Wolf A, Fazekas C, Mayer WJ, Kampik A, Haritoglou C. Epiretinal membrane characteristics correlate with photoreceptor layer defects in lamellar macular holes and macular pseudoholes. Retina. 2015;35(4):727–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Toyama T, Foggia MF, Yamaguchi T, Noda Y, Ueta T. The extent of stretched lamellar cleavage and visual acuity in macular pseudoholes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(9):1227–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wise GN. Schoenberg lecture: clinical features of idiopathic preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79:349–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fish RH, Anand R, Izbrand DJ. Macular pseudoholes. Clinical features and accuracy of diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(11):1665–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tsujikawa M, Ohji M, Fujikado T, et al. Differentiating full thickness macular holes from impending macular holes and macular pseudoholes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(2):117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen JC, Lee LR. Clinical spectrum of lamellar macular defects including pseudoholes and pseudocysts defined by optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1342–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, et al. Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:388–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Messner KH. Spontaneous separation of preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;83:9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Machemer R. The surgical removal of epiretinal macular membranes (macular puckers). Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1978;173:36–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Margheiro AR, Nachazel DP, Murphy PL, et al. The surgical management of epiretinal membranes, scientific exhibit, American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, 1981. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(September suppl):82.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Michels RG, Gilbert HD. Surgical management of macular pucker after retinal reattachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;88:925–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shea M. The surgical management of macular pucker. Can J Ophthalmol. 1979;14:110–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shea M. The surgical management of macular pucker in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 1980;87:70–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Michels RG. Vitreous surgery for macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981;92:628–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shimada H, Nakashizuka H, Hattori T, Mori R, Mizutani Y, Yuzawa M. Double staining with brilliant blue G and double peeling for epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(7):1370–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Park DW, Dugel PU, Garda J, Sipperley JO, Thach A, Sneed SR, et al. Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):62–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chuang LHWN, Chen YP, Hwang YS, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane surgery. Taiwan Journal of. Ophthalmology. 2012;2:56–9.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chang WC, Lin C, Lee CH, Sung TL, Tung TH, Liu JH. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Grewing R, Mester U. Results of surgery for epiretinal membranes and their recurrences. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(4):323–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Massin P, Paques M, Masri H, et al. Visual outcome of surgery for epiretinal membranes with macular pseudoholes. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(3):580–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hirota K, Itoh Y, Rii T, et al. Correlation between foveal interdigitation zone band defect and visual acuity after surgery for macular pseudohole. Retina. 2015;35:908–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jen-Hsiang Shen
    • 1
  • Wei-Chi Wu
    • 2
  • Chi-Chun Lai
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyChang-Gung Memorial HospitalLinkouTaiwan
  2. 2.College of MedicineChang-Gung UniversityTauyuanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations