Advertisement

Data Analysis and Interpretation

  • Krittinee NuttavuthisitEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Data collection techniques (in Chaps.  5 9) can lead to a compiled set of data ranging from observation field notes to interview records and transcripts, documents, images, and artifacts. These represent an aggregation of consumer perspectives, activities and other relevant phenomena.

References

  1. Aaker JL, Sengupta J (2000) Additivity versus attenuation: the role of culture in the resolution of information incongruity. J Consum Psychol 9(2):67–82.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP0902_2Google Scholar
  2. Abraham A (2015) Action researching power in an ESL and academic writing classroom. Qual Res J 15(2):155–165Google Scholar
  3. Anantharaman M (2016) Elite and ethical: the defensive distinctions of middle-class bicycling in Bangalore. India J Consum Cult 17:864–886.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540516634412Google Scholar
  4. Arnould EJ, Wallendorf M (1994) Market-oriented ethnography: Interpretation building and marketing strategy formulation. J Mark Res 31(4):484–504Google Scholar
  5. Belk RW (1984) Possessions and the extended self. J Hist Res Mark 11:139–168Google Scholar
  6. Belk RW, Fischer E, Kozinets R (2013) Qualitative consumer & marketing research. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Boddy CR (2007) Projective techniques in Taiwan and Asia-Pacific market research. Qual Mark Res 10(1):48–62.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750710720396Google Scholar
  8. Böhm A (2004) Theoretical coding: text analysis in grounded theory. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds) A companion to qualitative research. Sage Publications, London pp 270–275Google Scholar
  9. Bond MHH, Hwang K (1986) The social psychology of Chinese people. In: The psychology of the Chinese people. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 213–266Google Scholar
  10. Chan AH (2000) Middle-class formation and consumption in Hong Kong. In: B-H Chua (ed) Consumption in Asia: lifestyles and identities, pp 98–134Google Scholar
  11. Chan AM, Rossiter JR (2003) Measurement issues in cross-cultural values research. In: ANZMAC 2003 conference proceedings, 1–3 Dec 2003, Adelaide, Australia, pp 1583–1589Google Scholar
  12. Choi I, Nisbett RE (2000) Cultural psychology of surprise: holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(6):890–905Google Scholar
  13. Creswell JW (2007) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas JD (1976) Investigative social research: individual and team field research. Sage, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. Eckhardt GM, Houston M (2008) On the malleable nature of product meaning in China. J Consum Behav 7(6):484–495Google Scholar
  16. Ely M et al (1997) On writing qualitative research: living by words. Routledge/Falmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang T (1999) Chinese business negotiating style. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang T (2003) A critique of Hofstede’s fifth national culture dimension. Int J Cross Cult Manage 3(3):347–368Google Scholar
  19. Fieg J (1976) A common core: Thais and Americans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Fletcher R, Fang T (2006) Assessing the impact of culture on relationship creation and network formation in emerging Asian markets. Eur J Mark 40(3/4):430–446Google Scholar
  21. Gannon M (2001) Working across cultures: Applications and exercises. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  22. Gao G (1998) “Don’t take my word for it”: understanding Chinese speaking practices. Int J Intercultural Relat 22(2):163–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00003-0Google Scholar
  23. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldines, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Gould LC et al (1974) Connections: notes from the Heroin world. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  25. Granot E, Alejandro TB, Russell LM (2014) A socio-marketing analysis of the concept of cute and its consumer culture implications. J Consum Cult 14(1):66–87Google Scholar
  26. Grinshpun H (2014) Deconstructing a global commodity: coffee, culture, and consumption in Japan. J Consum Cult 14(3):343–364Google Scholar
  27. Hall E (1976) Beyond culture. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirschman EC (1987) Theoretical perspectives of time use: implications for consumer behavior research. Res Consum Behav 2:55–81Google Scholar
  29. Hunt J (1989) Psychoanalytic aspects of fieldwork. Qualitative research methods, vol 18Google Scholar
  30. Kimura J, Belk RW (2005) Christmas in Japan: globalization versus localization. Consumption Mark Cult 8(3):325–338Google Scholar
  31. Kozinets RV, Sherry JF, DeBerry-Spence B, Duhachek A, Nuttavuthisit K, Storm D (2002) Themed flagship brand stores in the new millennium: theory, practice, prospects, the William R. Davidson honorable mention award. J Retail 78(1):17–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00063-XGoogle Scholar
  32. Leung MVH (2015) “Talk to her, She is also Chinese”: a reflection on the spatial-temporal reach of co-ethnicity in migration research. Qual Soc Res 16(2), Art 13Google Scholar
  33. Leung VSY, Hui ANN (2014) A Recent Look: creative professionals’ perceptions of creativity in Hong Kong. Serv Mark Q 35(2):138–154.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2014.885366Google Scholar
  34. Lévi-Strauss C (1963) Structural anthropology. Basic Book, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Lévi-Strauss C (1976) Structural anthropology, vol II. Basic Book, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Levy SJ (1981) Intepreting consumer mythology: a structural approach to consumer behavior. J Mark 45(3):49–61Google Scholar
  37. Lim TS, Choi SH (1996) Inerpersonal relationships in Korea. In: Gudykunst WB, Ting-Toomey S, Nishida T (eds) Communication in personal relationship across cultures. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 122–136Google Scholar
  38. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1986) But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In: Williams DD (ed) Naturalistic evaluation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 73–84Google Scholar
  39. Lincoln JR, McBride K (1987) Japanese industrial organization in comparative perspective. Ann Rev Sociol 13:289–312Google Scholar
  40. Liong M (2015) In the shadow of deception: ethical dilemma, positionality, and reflexivity in ethnographic fieldwork. Qual Res J 15(1):61–73.  https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-03-2014-0008Google Scholar
  41. Liu JH (2011) Asian epistemologies and contemporary social psychological research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 213–226Google Scholar
  42. Matzner D (2014) Jai Bhim comrade and the politics of sound in urban indian visual culture. Vis Anthropol Rev 30(2):127–138.  https://doi.org/10.1111/var.12043Google Scholar
  43. McGrath MA, Sherry JF Jr, Diamond N (2013) Discordant retail brand ideology in the House of Barbie. Qual Mark Res Int J 16(1):12–37Google Scholar
  44. Nachman SR (1984) Lies my informants told me. J Anthropol Res 40:536–555Google Scholar
  45. Neal M (2016) Dirty customers: stigma and identity among sex tourists. J Consum Cult 18(1):131–148Google Scholar
  46. Nguyen TDT (2015a) Conducting semi-structured interviews with the Vietnamese. Qual Res J 15(1):35–46Google Scholar
  47. Nguyen TDT (2015b) Gender discrimination in the way the Vietnamese talk about face the dien: results from interviews with Vietnamese teachers. Qual Res J 15(2):147–154Google Scholar
  48. Nochi M (2013a) Analysis of narrative text. In: Yoko Y, Asao T, Sato T, Akita K, Nochi M, Yamori K (eds) Handbook of qualitative psychology. Shinyo-Sha, Tokyo, Japan, pp 324–344Google Scholar
  49. Nochi M (2013b) Analysis of narrative text. In: Yamada Y, Asao T, Sato T, Akita K, Nochi A, Yamori K (eds) Handbook of qualitative psychology. Shinyo-sha, Tokyo, pp 324–344 (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  50. Nuttavuthisit K (2005) The holistic perspective of Thailand brand meaning. In: Proceeding of the 9th international conference on global business and economic development, May 2005Google Scholar
  51. Nuttavuthisit K (2007a) Branding Thailand: correcting the negative image of sex tourism. Place Branding Publ Diplomacy 3(1):21–30Google Scholar
  52. Nuttavuthisit K (2007b) Postmodern consumption and marketing. Sasin J Manage 13(2):133–140Google Scholar
  53. Nuttavuthisit K (2007c) The dynamic of brand equity. Asia-Pacific Adv Consum Res 7:2–3Google Scholar
  54. Park S, Lunt N (2015) Confucianism and qualitative interviewing: working Seoul to Soul. Qual Soc Res 16(2), Art 7Google Scholar
  55. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation method, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, IncGoogle Scholar
  56. Polsa P (2013) Crystallization and research in Asia. Qual Mark Res 16(1):76–93.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751311289776Google Scholar
  57. Ricoeur P (1981) Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Schoen RF (2015) Educated girls, absent grooms, and runaway brides: narrating social change in rural Bangladesh. Qual Soc Res 16(1), Art 18. http://www.qualitative-research.net/
  59. Scupin R (1997) The KJ method: a technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology. Hum Organ 56(2):233–237Google Scholar
  60. Sobh R, Belk R (2011) Gender privacy in Arab Gulf states: implications for consumption and marketing. In: Sandicki O, Rice G (eds) Handbook of Islamic marketing. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 74–96Google Scholar
  61. Song H, Hsu HC (2013) The image of Taiwan as a travel destination: perspectives from Mainland China. J Travel Tour Mark 30(3):253–271Google Scholar
  62. Spiggle S (1994) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. J Consum Res 21(3):491–503Google Scholar
  63. Sternberg RJ, Lubart TU, Kaufman JC, Pretz JE (2005) Creativity. In: Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG (eds) Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 351–370Google Scholar
  64. Strauss A (1987) Qualitative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  66. Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications Inc, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  67. Strike K, Posner G (1983) Types of synthesis and their criteria in Spencer A. Ward & Linda J. Reed (eds), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation. Temple University Press. pp 343–362Google Scholar
  68. Thompson CJ (1990) Eureka! and other tests of significance: a new look at evaluating qualitative research. In: Marvin G, Gerald JG, Richard WP (eds) Advances in consumer research, vol 17. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT pp 25–30Google Scholar
  69. Thompson C, Locander W, Pollio H (1989) Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: the philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. J Consum Res 16(2):133–146Google Scholar
  70. Thompson C, Pollio H, Locander W (1994) The spoken and the unspoken: a hermeneutic approach to understanding the cultural viewpoints that underlie consumers’ expressed meanings. J Consum Res 21(3):432–452Google Scholar
  71. Triandis HC, Gelfand MJ (1998) Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. J of Pers Soc Psychol, 74(1), 118–128Google Scholar
  72. Tu WM (1994) Embodying the universe: a note on Confucian self-realization. In: Ames RT, Dissanayake W, Kasulis TP (eds) Self as person in asian theory and practice. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 177–186Google Scholar
  73. Viswambharan AP, Priya KR (2016) Documentary analysis as a qualitative methodology to explore disaster mental health: insights from analysing a documentary on communal riots. Qual Res 16(1):43–59.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114567494Google Scholar
  74. Wallendorf M, Belk RW (1989) Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In: Hirschman E (ed) Interpretive consumer. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, pp 69–84Google Scholar
  75. Wallendorf M, Brucks M (1993) Introspection in consumer research: implementation and implications. J Consum Res 20(3):339–359Google Scholar
  76. Weiner RP (2000) Creativity and beyond cultures, values, and change. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams P, Aaker JL (2002) Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? J Consum Res, 28(4):636–649Google Scholar
  78. Zhao X, Belk RW (2008a) Advertising consumer culture in 1930s Shanghai: globalization and localization in Yuefenpai. J Advertising 37:45–56.  https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370204Google Scholar
  79. Zhao X, Belk RW (2008b) Desire on fire: a naturalistic inquiry of chinese death ritual consumption. In: Borghini S, McGrath MA, Otnes CC (eds) European advances in consumer research, vol 8. Association for Consumer Research, Valdosta, GA, pp 245–246Google Scholar
  80. Zhu Z (1999) The practice of multimodal approaches, the challenge of cross-cultural communication, and the search for responses. Hum Relat 52(5):579–607Google Scholar
  81. Zhu Z (2000) Dealing with a differentiated whole: the philosophy of the WSR approach. Syst Pract Action Res 13(1):21–57Google Scholar
  82. Zito A (2014) Writing in water, or, evanescence, enchantment and ethnography in a Chinese urban park. Vis Anthropol Rev 30(1):11–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sasin Graduate Institute of Business AdministrationChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations