Channeling of Magnetic Flux in YBa2Cu3O7−δ Superlattices

  • H. J. Mollatt
  • T. Qureishy
  • A. Crisan
  • V. S. Dang
  • P. MikheenkoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


We report an unusual effect of channeled magnetic flux motion in YBa2Cu3O7−δ/PrBa2Cu3O7−δ superlattices grown by pulsed laser deposition. Magneto-optical imaging reveals that flux moves along a set of parallel and perpendicular lines, while optical microscopy does not show any features on the surface that may cause this effect. In contrast, scanning electron microscopy registers sub-micron fractures in the superlattices, corresponding to the flux lines, but the magnetic flux channels are much wider than the width of these fractures. To further clarify the origin of flux channels, electrical transport measurements on the superlattices have been performed. Their current-voltage characteristics reveal the presence of distinctive branches related to the flux motion along the selective channels, following which magnetic flux can cross the sample in a shortest and least resistive way. The application of very large current overheated the superlattice along these channels evaporating superconducting material and exposing wider than in the superconductor fractures in the substrate. It is concluded that motion of flux in the channels is controlled not only by the presence of nano-fractures in YBa2Cu3O7−δ/PrBa2Cu3O7−δ, but also stresses developed in the superconducting material appearing due to the fracturing of the substrate.


Superconductor Superlattice Magnetic flux Channeling 


  1. 1.
    Marchionini BG, Yamada Y, Martini L et al (2017) High-temperature superconductivity: a roadmap for electric power sector applications, 2015–2030. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 27(4):0500907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nault RM (ed) (2006) Basic research needs for superconductivity. Report on the basic energy sciences workshop on superconductivity, Argonne National Laboratory, Arlington, 8–11 May 2006Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crisan A, Dang VS, Mikheenko P (2017) Nano-engineered pinning centres in YBCO superconducting films. Phys C 553:118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mikheenko P, Sarkar A, Dang VS et al (2009) c-Axis correlated extended defects and critical current in YBa2Cu3Ox films grown on Au and Ag-nano dot decorated substrates. Phys C 469(14):798–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crisan A, Dang VS, Mikheenko P et al (2009) Pinning potential in thick PrBa2Cu3Oy/YBa2Cu3Ox quasi-multilayers. Phys C 470(1):55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dang VS, Mikheenko P, Sarkar A et al (2010) Critical current density in Ag/YBa2Cu3Ox and PrBa2Cu3Oy/YBa2Cu3Ox multilayers. JPCS 234(1):012010Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johansen TH, Shantsev DV (eds) (2004) Magneto-optical imaging. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jooss C, Albrecht J, Kuhn H et al (2002) Magneto-optical studies of current distributions in high-Tc superconductors. Rep Prog Phys 65(5):651–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mikheenko P, Yurchenko VV, Cardwell DA et al (2013) Magneto-optical imaging of superconductors for liquid hydrogen applications. J Supercond Novel Magn 26(5):1499–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mikheenko PN, Kuzovlev YE (1993) Inductance measurements of HTSC films with high critical currents. Phys C 204(3–4):229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. J. Mollatt
    • 1
  • T. Qureishy
    • 1
  • A. Crisan
    • 2
  • V. S. Dang
    • 3
  • P. Mikheenko
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.National Institute for Materials Physics BucharestMagureleRomania
  3. 3.Nano and Energy CenterVNU Hanoi University of ScienceThanh Xuan, HanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations