In addition to one of the most common complications, capsular contracture and implant rupture, several other complications may occur from augmentation mammoplasty. There are various complications; however, fatal complications are very low in probability, making augmentation mammoplasty a relatively safe group for surgery. In order to find a solution for these various complications, the operator needs to fully understand the exact cause and complication process in order to plan the treatment. Most patients who have had complications through axillary incision augmentation mammoplasty had required a reoperation using the inframammary fold incision approach. However, endoscopy sufficiently allows reoperation using the axillary approach. In this chapter, we will be further elaborating on approaching revisional augmentation mammoplasty using the axillary endoscopic approach. The author hopes that the endoscopic approach method will be further improved and research for various new surgical methods be developed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Handel N, Jensen JA, Black Q, Waisman JR, Silverstein MJ. The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(7):1521–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn JM, Stevenson TR. Pneumothorax as a complication of breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(4):1122–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconst Surg. 2006;117(3):757–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virden CP, Dobke MK, Stein P, Parsons CL, Frank DH. Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1992;16(2):173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantine RS, Constantine FC, Rohrich RJ. The ever-changing role of biofilms in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):865e–72e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deva AK, Adams WP Jr, Vickery K. The role of bacterial biofilms in device-associated infection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1319–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams WP Jr, Rios JL. SmithSJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(7S):46S–52S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Losken A. Sterility in breast implant placement: the Keller funnel and the “no touch” technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(4S):9S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger SL, Ellenbogen R, Desvigne MN, Svehlak S, Heck R. Zafirlukast(Accolate): a new treatment for capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22(4):329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spear SL, Baker JL Jr. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(5):1119–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker JL Jr, Bartels RJ, Douglas WM. Closed compression technique for rupturing a contracted capsule around a breast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58(2):137–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collis N, Sharpe DT. Recurrence of subglandular breast implant capsular contracture: anterior versus total capsulectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(4):792–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spear SL, Dayan JH, Bogue D, Clemens MW, Newman M, Teltelbaum S, Maxwell GP. The “neosubpectoral” pocket for the correction of symmastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(3):695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar