Advertisement

Transaxillary Endoscopic Augmentation Mammoplasty

  • Won June Yoon
Chapter

Abstract

Though the design process before surgery is aimed for accuracy, through the axillary approach, it is possible to adjust a new inframammary fold level, therefore in the cases that are difficult to design the new inframammary fold, and implant sizer can be used during the surgery to determine the new inframammary fold position. The aseptic preparation is important in the preoperative stage; however it is also crucial that the operation progresses aseptically. During surgery, it is also critical to stop the bleeding vessels with meticulous electro-cauterization to prevent postoperative bleeding. After the insertion of the implants, the breast shape and new inframammary fold needs to be checked again, as well as if there are any internal bleeding, and then skin suture is performed. The emphasis of minimal bleeding and aseptic performance is critical during surgery.

Keywords

Transaxillary augmentation mammoplasty Endoscopic augmentation mammoplasty Adams solution Triple antibiotics solution Nipple shield Endoscopic submuscular dissection Keller funnel 

References

  1. 1.
    Hoelher H. Breast augmentation: the axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg. 1973;26(4):373–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cho MJ, Ham KS, Lim P. Augmentation mammoplasty by the transaxillary approach. Arch Plast Surg. 1977;4(1):7–10.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ho LC. Endoscopic assisted transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46(4):332–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Price CI, Eaves FF III, Nahai F, Jones G, Bostwick J III. Endoscopic transaxillary subpectoral breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(5):612–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tebbetts JB. Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammoplasty: long-term follow-up and refinements. Plast Reconst Surg. 1984;74(5):636–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park WJ. Endoscopic assisted transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty. Arch Plast Surg. 1997;24(1):133–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sim HB, Wie HG, Hong YG. Endoscopic transaxillary dual plane breast augmentation. Arch Plast Surg. 2008;35(5):545–52.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(5):1255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee SH, Yoon WJ. Axillary endoscopic subglandular tunneling approach for types 2 and 3 dual plane breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2014;38(3):521–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(7S):46S–52S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Losken A. Sterility in breast implant placement: the Keller Funnel and the “no touch” technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(4S):9S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heden P. Form stable shaped high cohesive gel implants. In Hall-Findlay EJ, and Evans GR, editors. Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Saunders; 2010. p. 357–86.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park J. Primary breast augmentation with anatomical form-stable implant. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;19(1):7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Won June Yoon
    • 1
  1. 1.MIGO Plastic Surgery ClinicSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations