New Wine into Old Wineskins? Methodenstreit, Agency, and Structure in the Philosophy of Experimental Economics

  • Ivan BoldyrevEmail author


Experiments have become part and parcel of today’s economics. Experimental evidence is used to update and to refute economic theories but also helps in formulating new theories or policies. Experimental evidence and (quasi)experimental designs are becoming increasingly popular in many fields of applied economics. The consequences of this transformation are deep enough to prompt methodological reflection at least as wide-ranging and radical, as the change itself. In this discussion, seemingly outdated distinctions may gain new significance and inspire more general questions on the structure and perspectives of current economic science.


  1. Amable, B., Boyer, R., & Lordon, F. (1997). The ad hoc in economics: the pot calling the Kettle Black. In A. D’Autume & J. Cartelier (Eds.), Is economics becoming a hard science? (pp. 252–275). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhouse, R., & Cherrier, B. (2017). The age of the applied economist: The transformation of economics since the 1970s. History of Political Economy, 49(annual suppl.). 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2007). Economic experiments and the construction of markets. In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Greif, A. (1997). Cliometrics after 40 years. American Economic Review, 87(2), 400–403.Google Scholar
  6. Guala, F. (2007). How to do things with experimental economics. In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gul, F., & Pesendorfer, W. (2008). The case for mindless economics. In A. Caplin & A. Shotter (Eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hands, W. D. (2014). Normative ecological rationality: Normative rationality in the fast-and-frugal- heuristics research program. Journal of Economics Methodology, 21(4), 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamermesh, D. (2013). Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 162–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (Eds.). (2004). Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2016). Performative mechanisms. In I. Boldyrev & E. Svetlova (Eds.), Enacting dismal science: new perspectives on the performativity of economics. Palgrave McMillan: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  12. Korinek, A. (2017). Thoughts on DSGE Macroeconomics: Matching the moment, but missing the point? Available at SSRN
  13. Lee, K. S. (2011). Three ways of linking laboratory endeavours to the realm of policies. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 18(5), 755–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Plott, C. R. (1991). Will economics become an experimental science? Southern Economic Journal, 57, 901–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rizvi, S. A. T. (1994). Game theory to the rescue? Contributions to Political Economy, 13(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Santos, A. C. (2007). The ‘materials’ of experimental economics: Technological versus behavioral experiments. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14, 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Santos, A. C. (2011). Experimental economics. In J. B. Davis & W. D. Hands (Eds.), The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Sugden, R. (2005). Experiments as exhibits and experiments as tests. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Institute for Management ResearchRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations