Advertisement

Reconsidering Induced Value Theory

  • Toshiji KawagoeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Why we should pay real monetary rewards to subjects in the laboratory experiment? This question is often raised not only by researchers of different disciplines such as psychology but also by our fellow economics researchers who are not so familiar with experimental methods.

References

  1. Azrieli, Y., Chambers, C. P., & Healy, P. J. (2016). Incentives in experiments: a theoretical analysis. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  2. Bade, S. (2014). Randomization devices and the elicitation of ambiguity averse preferences. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  3. Baillon, A., Halevy, Y., & Li, C. (2015). Experimental elicitation of ambiguity attitude using the random incentive system. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, D., Dickhaut, J., & O’Brien, B. (1986). Controlling preferences for lotteries on units of experimental exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binmore, K. G. (1999). Why experiment in economics? Economic Journal, 109, F16–F24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camerer, C., Ho, T.-H., & Chong, J. K. (2004). A cognitive hierarchy theory of one-shot games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 861–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandrasekhar, A. G., & Xandri, J. P. (2011). A note on payments in experiments of infinitely repeated games with discounting. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  9. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Halladay, B. (2016). Experimental methods: pay one or pay all. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coller, M., & Williams, M. B. (1999). Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics, 2, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76, 508–515.Google Scholar
  14. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuzmics, C. (2013). A rational ambiguity averse person will never display her ambiguity aversion. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  17. Laury, S. K. (2005). Pay one or pay all: rndom selection of one choice for payment. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  18. McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games, Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 6–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oechssler, J., & Roomets, A. (2013) Unintended hedging in ambiguity experiments. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  20. Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Shertyuk, K., Tarui, N., & Saijo, T. (2013). Payment schemes in infinite-horizon experimental games. Experimental Economics, 16, 125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, V. L. (1976). Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review, 66, 274–279.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, V. L. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review, 72, 923–955.Google Scholar
  24. Stahl, D. O., & Wilson, P. W. (1995). On player’s model of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 218–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wakker, P. P. (2007). Message to referees who want to embark on yet another discussion of the random-lottery incentive system for individual choice. https://personal.eur.nl/wakker/miscella/debates/randomlinc.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Future University HakodateHokkaidoJapan

Personalised recommendations