Advertisement

Analysis of the Electronic Structure and Emission Process of Exciplex in Solids

  • Chang-Ki Moon
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

The excited charge-transfer (CT) complex (exciplex) has attracted much attention from researchers in the fields of OLEDs and OPVs. Upon excitation, intermolecular CT between donor (D) and acceptor (A) molecules forms a CT state at a heterojunction. The CT state then either dissociates into positive and negative polarons or relaxes into the ground state by emitting light.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu G, Gao J, Hummelen JC, Wudl F, Heeger AJ (1995) Polymer photovoltiac cells: Enhanced efficiencies via a network of internal donor-acceptor heterojunctions. Science 270:1789ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sariciftci NS, Smilowitz L, Heeger AJ, Wudl F (1992) Photoinduced electron transfer from a conducting polymer to buckminsterfullerene. Science 258(5087):1474–1476ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jenekhe SA, Osaheni JA (1994) Excimers and exciplexes of conjugated polymers. Science 265(5173):765–768ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang JF et al (1998) Exciplex electroluminescence from organic bilayer devices composed of triphenyldiamine and quinoxaline derivatives. Adv Mater 10:230–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gélinas S et al (2011) The binding energy of charge-transfer excitons localized at polymeric semiconductor heterojunctions. J Phys Chem C 115:7114–7119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Offermans T, van Hal PA, Meskers SC, Koetse MM, Janssen RA (2005) Exciplex dynamics in a blend of π-conjugated polymers with electron donating and accepting properties: MDMO-PPV and PCNEPV. Phys Rev B 72:045213ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morteani AC, Friend RH, Silva C (2004) Endothermic exciplex–exciton energy-transfer in a blue-emitting polymeric heterojunction system. Chem Phys Lett 391:81–84ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goushi K, Adachi C (2012) Efficient organic light-emitting diodes through up-conversion from triplet to singlet excited states of exciplexes. Appl Phys Lett 101:023306.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4737006ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goushi K, Yoshida K, Sato K, Adachi C (2012) Organic light-emitting diodes employing efficient reverse intersystem crossing for triplet-to-singlet state conversion. Nat Photonics 6:253–258.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.31ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park Y-S, Kim K-H, Kim J-J (2013) Efficient triplet harvesting by fluorescent molecules through exciplexes for high efficiency organic light-emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 102:153306.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4802716ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    dos Santos PL, Dias FB, Monkman AP (2016) Investigation of the mechanisms giving rise to TADF in exciplex states. J Phys Chem C 120:18259–18267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu XK et al (2015) Remanagement of singlet and triplet excitons in single-emissive-layer hybrid white organic light-emitting devices using thermally activated delayed fluorescent blue exciplex. Adv Mater 27:7079–7085.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201502897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu XK et al (2015) Prediction and design of efficient exciplex emitters for high-efficiency, thermally activated delayed-fluorescence organic light-emitting diodes. Adv Mater 27:2378–2383.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim K-H, Yoo S-J, Kim J-J (2016) Boosting triplet harvest by reducing nonradiative transition of exciplex toward fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes with 100% internal quantum efficiency. Chem Mater 28:1936–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim KH, Moon CK, Sun JW, Sim B, Kim JJ (2015) Triplet harvesting by a conventional fluorescent emitter using reverse intersystem crossing of host triplet exciplex. Adv Optical Mater 3:895–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao B et al (2015) Highly efficient red OLEDs using DCJTB as the dopant and delayed fluorescent exciplex as the host. Sci Rep 5:10697ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim HG, Kim KH, Moon CK, Kim JJ (2017) Harnessing triplet excited states by fluorescent dopant utilizing codoped phosphorescent dopant in exciplex host for efficient fluorescent organic light emitting diodes. Adv Optical Mater 5(3):1600749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moon CK et al (2017) Combined inter-and intramolecular charge-transfer processes for highly efficient fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes with reduced triplet exciton quenching. Adv Mater 29(17):1606448.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Müllen K, Scherf U (2006) Organic light emitting devices: synthesis, properties and applications. WileyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gould IR, Young RH, Mueller LJ, Albrecht A, Farid S (1994) Electronic structures of exciplexes and excited charge-transfer complexes. J Am Chem Soc 116:8188–8199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sreearunothai P et al (2006) Influence of copolymer interface orientation on the optical emission of polymeric semiconductor heterojunctions. Phys Rev Lett 96:117403ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang Y-S et al (2008) Electronic structures of interfacial states formed at polymeric semiconductor heterojunctions. Nat Mater 7:483ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sasabe H et al (2011) Influence of substituted pyridine rings on physical properties and electron mobilities of 2-methylpyrimidine skeleton-based electron transporters. Adv Func Mater 21:336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Su SJ, Gonmori E, Sasabe H, Kido J (2008) Highly efficient organic blue-and white-light-emitting devices having a carrier-and exciton-confining structure for reduced efficiency roll-off. Adv Mater 20:4189–4194Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Graves D, Jankus V, Dias FB, Monkman A (2014) Photophysical investigation of the thermally activated delayed emission from films of m-MTDATA: PBD exciplex. Adv Func Mater 24:2343–2351.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201303389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deotare PB et al (2015) Nanoscale transport of charge-transfer states in organic donor-acceptor blends. Nat Mater 14:1130–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4424ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frischeisen J, Yokoyama D, Adachi C, Brütting W (2010) Determination of molecular dipole orientation in doped fluorescent organic thin films by photoluminescence measurements. Appl Phys Lett 96:073302.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3309705ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moon CK, Kim SY, Lee JH, Kim JJ (2015) Luminescence from oriented emitting dipoles in a birefringent medium. Optics Express 23(7):A279–A291.  https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.00a279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marcus RA, Sutin N (1985) Electron transfers in chemistry and biology. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Rev Bioenergetics 811:265–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brédas JL, Cornil J, Heeger AJ (1996) The exciton binding energy in luminescent conjugated polymers. Adv Mater 8:447–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baumeier B, Andrienko D, Rohlfing M (2012) Frenkel and charge-transfer excitations in donor-acceptor complexes from many-body green’s functions theory. J Chem Theory Comput 8:2790–2795.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300311xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Martin RL (2003) Natural transition orbitals. J Chem Phys 118:4775–4777.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1558471ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Inai Y, Sisido M, Imanishi Y (1990) Distance and orientation dependence of electron transfer and exciplex formation of naphthyl and p-dimethylanilino groups fixed on a helical polypeptide chain. J Phys Chem 94:6237–6243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ogiwara T, Wakikawa Y, Ikoma T (2015) Mechanism of intersystem crossing of thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules. J Phys Chem A 119:3415–3418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Etherington MK, Gibson J, Higginbotham HF, Penfold TJ, Monkman AP (2016) Revealing the spin-vibronic coupling mechanism of thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Nat Commun 7:13680.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13680ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Samanta PK, Kim D, Coropceanu V, Bredas JL (2017) Up-conversion intersystem crossing rates in organic emitters for thermally activated delayed fluorescence: impact of the nature of singlet versus triplet excited states. J Am Chem Soc 139:4042–4051.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b12124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gibson J, Monkman AP, Penfold TJ (2016) The importance of vibronic coupling for efficient reverse intersystem crossing in thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules. Chem Phys Chem 17:2956–2961.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201600662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dias FB et al (2016) The role of local triplet excited states and D-A relative orientation in thermally activated delayed fluorescence: photophysics and devices. Adv Sci 3(12):1600080.  https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lee K, Kim D (2016) Local-excitation versus charge-transfer characters in the triplet state: theoretical insight into the singlet-triplet energy differences of carbazolyl-phthalonitrile-based thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials. J Phys Chem C 120:28330–28336.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chang-Ki Moon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Graduate SchoolSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations