User Expectations of Augmented Reality Experience in Indian School Education

  • Pratiti SarkarEmail author
  • Jayesh S. Pillai
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)


Emerging technologies are lately being welcomed in Indian schools to enrich the quality of teaching and learning. Augmented Reality (AR) is one such technology that can be introduced in the classrooms. For a fruitful acceptance, it is required to design the AR interactions in schools as per the expectations of students, teachers and parents for a satisfactory user experience. In this paper, we present our study that was conducted with 47 participants belonging to three user groups of 6 parents, 7 teachers and 34 students. The broad goal was to understand the outlook of students toward technology as well as the expectations of the three user groups from an AR experience in Indian school education. Based on the mapping of the user stories, certain inferences were obtained which suggested the user requirements pertaining to AR experience in classrooms. We posit that these characteristic expectations of user experience can be used to develop AR applications for classrooms in future.


Augmented Reality User expectations User experience Indian school education Educational technology 



We would like to thank the Principal, Vice-Principal and teachers of Bal Bharati Public School, GRH Marg, New Delhi, India, who gave the consent and their valuable time for this study. They helped us in understanding the current technology scenario in education and provided insightful comments.


  1. 1.
    Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., MacIntyre, B.: Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 21(6), 34–47 (2001). (IEEE Computer Society)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mechling, L.C., Gast, D.L., Krupa, K.: Impact of SMART Board technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learning. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37(10), 1869 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Park, Y.: A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distributed Learning 12(2), 78–102 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C.E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., González-Marrero, A.: Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13(2), 469–486 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amin, D., Govilkar, S.: Comparative study of augmented reality sdk’s. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. 5(1), 11–26 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, K.: Augmented reality in education and training. Tech. Trends 56(2), 13–21 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G., Johnson, E.: Augmented reality: an overview and five directions for AR in education. J. Educ. Technol. Dev. Exch. 4(1), 119–140 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, K.-H., Tsai, C.-C.: Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: suggestions for future research. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 22(4), 449–462 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D.: Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Comput. Graph. 27(3), 339–345 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang, K.-E., Chang, C.-T., Hou, H.-T., Sung, Y.-T., Chao, H.-L., Lee, C.-M.: Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Comput. Educ. 71, 185–197 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., Kinshuk.: Augmented reality trends in education: A Syst. Rev. Res. Appl. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(4), 133–149 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, T.-Y., Chu, Y.-L.: Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 630–643 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Fabiani, P., Benesova, W., Meneses, M.D., Mora, C.E.: Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 752–761 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Olsson, T., Ihamäki, P., Lagerstam, E., Ventä-Olkkonen, L., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K.: User expectations for mobile mixed reality services: an initial user study. In: European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Designing beyond the Product—Understanding Activity and User Experience in Ubiquitous Environments, p. 19. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olsson, T., Lagerstam, E., Kärkkäinen, T., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K.: Expected user experience of mobile augmented reality services: a user study in the context of shopping centres. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 17(2), 287–304 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Clark, A.M., Clark, M.T.: Pokemon Go and research: qualitative, mixed methods research, and the supercomplexity of interventions (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Babajeva, L.: Contemporary Theories of Adult Learning/Pieaugušo mācīšanās mūsdienu teorijas (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDC School of DesignIndian Institute of TechnologyBombayIndia

Personalised recommendations