A Study on the Anthropometry of the Hira Community of Assam: Its Use in Redesigning a Pottery Wheel

  • Bibhuti Ranjan BhattacharjyaEmail author
  • Sashindra Kumar Kakoty
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)


In the study, 15 anthropometric dimensions of the female members of the Hira community are surveyed. Measured anthropometric dimensions are: standing position—weight, stature, vertical reach, eye height and arm reach from the wall and span; sitting posture—sitting height, popliteal height, knee height, elbow rest height, coronoid fossa to hand length, buttock-knee length, hip breadth and functional leg length. Anthropometric indices, namely relative sitting height (RSH), body surface area (BSA) and body mass index (BMI) are calculated. Sample population’s men age and body weight are found to be 38.85 ± 11.99 year and 45.97 ± 10.53 kg, respectively. Mean stature is 151.98 ± 5.83 cm. Correlation coefficient among different anthropometric dimensions is calculated. The results depict a high correlation among different anthropometric dimensions. The highest correlation is found between stature and vertical reach (0.92). Finally, an attempt is made to illustrate the use of such data in designing equipment for pottery industry of Assam.


Anthropometric data Ergonomics Hira community Pottery wheel 



The authors are grateful to the Rural Technology Action Group (RuTAG)—north-east for their financial support for this study. We are also thankful to all the members of RuTAG, village heads, coordinating NGOs and project staff for their kind support during the data collection process.


  1. 1.
    Choobineh, A., Hosseini, M., Lahmi, M., Jazani, R.K., Shahnavaz, H.: Musculoskeletal problems in Iranian hand-woven carpet industry. Appl. Ergon. 38, 617–624 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dewangan, K.N., Prasanna Kumar, G.V., Suja, P.L., Choudhury, M.D.: Anthropometric dimensions of farm youth of the north eastern region of India. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 35, 979–989 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dewangan, K.N., Owary, C., Datta, R.K.: Anthropometric data of female farm workers from north eastern India and design of hand tools of the hilly region. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 38, 90–100 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dewangan, K.N., Owary, C., Datta, R.K.: Anthropometry of male agricultural workers of north-eastern India and its use in design of agricultural tools and equipment. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40, 560–573 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dixit, J., Namgial, D., Sharma, S., Lohan, S.K., Kumar, D.: Anthropometric survey of farm workers of Ladakh region of India and its application in equipment design. Agric. Eng. Int.: CIGR J. 16(2), 80–88 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hertzberg, H.T.E.: The conference on standardization of anthropometric techniques and terminology (a report). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 28(1), 1–16 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mandahawi, M., Al-Ghandoor, A., Samhouri, M. and Al-Shihabi, S.: Modeling hand anthropometric dimensions of the Jordanian population: the application of multivariate linear regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy techniques. In: Fowler, J., Mason, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2008 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, pp. 1242–1247Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Neil, D.H.: Ergonomics in industrially developing countries: does its application defer from that in industrially advanced countries? Appl. Ergon. 31(6), 31–640 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Office of the Register General India, DATA HIGHLIGHTS: THE SCHEDULED CASTES Census of India 2001:
  10. 10.
    Patel, T., Sanjog, J., Chatterjee, A., Karmakar, S.: Statistical interpretation of collected anthropometric data of agricultural workers from Northeast India and comparison with national and international databases. IIE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Human Factors 4, 197–210 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shahida Nurul, M.S., Zawiah Siti, M.D., Case, K.: The relationship between anthropometry and hand grip strength among elderly Malaysians. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 50, 17–25 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Talukdar, K.: Pottery tradition of South Kamrup- a photo story by Kishore Talukdar, NEZENE—Bridging the gap., last accessed on 1 May 2018 (2015)
  13. 13.
    Vyavahare, R.T., Kallurkar, S.P.: Anthropometry of male agricultural workers of western India for the design of tools and equipments. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 53, 80–85 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Victor, V.M., Nath, S., Verma, A.: Technical note Anthropometric survey of Indian farm workers to approach ergonomics in agricultural machinery design. Appl. Ergon. 33, 579–581 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yadav, R., Tewari, V.K., Prasad, N.: Technical note: Anthropometric data of Indian farm workers—a module analysis. Appl. Ergon. 28(1), 69–71 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bibhuti Ranjan Bhattacharjya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sashindra Kumar Kakoty
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Rural Technology, IITGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations