Advertisement

Influence of Lexical Semantics on Product Form

  • Manasi KanetkarEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 135)

Abstract

Visual design often needs worded articulation and a written or spoken argument to be comprehended fully. Product attributes are described as words too. A design brief is essentially a worded statement, which then gets a visual form. Even while analyzing and or critiquing visual design, we use certain words or phrases. These words help a designer define the semantic attributes of the form. This paper aims at studying influence of the lexical role of a word (in a design brief) on product form. It questions the connection between lexical semantics and product form. This paper proposes a hypothesis that ‘the noun or an action verb which dominates the product identity, whereas the adjectives will have their limited influence on the identity’. The study is a part of a larger project ‘exchanges between the visual language and written languages’.

Keywords

Semiotics in design Product semantics Product form 

References

  1. 1.
    Chandler, D.: Semiotics: The Basics. Routledge, London (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, R., Lin, C.Y., Wong, J.: An application of multidimensional scaling in product semantics. ISSN 0169-8141, pp. 193–204 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, E.E., Shoben, E.J., Rips, L.J.: Structure and process in semantic memory: a featural model for semantic decisions. Psychol. Rev. 81, 214–241 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Athavankar, U.A.: The semantic profile of products: an approach to product semantics based on strategies used in human information processing. In: Vihima Sussan (ed.) Semantic Vision in Design. University of Industrial Arts, Helsinki, pp. dl–d33 (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta, A., Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval. Commun. ACM 40(5), 70–79 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheth A., Thomas C., MehraP.: Continuous semantics to analyze real-time data. IEEE Internet Comput. 14(6), 84–89 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anyanwu K., Maduko A, Sheth, A.: SemRank: ranking complex relationship search results on the semantic web In: WWW ’05: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 117–127 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krippendorff, K.: Product semantics: a triangulation and four design theories. In Väkevä, S. (ed.) Product Semantic ’89 (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marco, B., Roberto, Z.: Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1183–1193 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dowty, D.: Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3), 547–619 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Athavankar, U.A.: Categorization, natural language and design. Design Issues V(2), 100–111 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Gonenc, E., Ilyas, C.: Using Lexical chains for keyword extraction. Inf. Process. Manag. 43(6), 1705–1714 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woods, W.A.: What’s in a link: foundations for semantic networks. In: Bobrow, D.G., Allan, C., Kaufmann, M. (eds.) Representation and Understanding, pp. 35–82. San Diego (1975). ISBN 9780121085506 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Product DesignUnitedworld Institute of DesignGandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations