Advertisement

Cultural Domain Analysis for Soundscape Assessment

  • Malay DhameliaEmail author
  • Girish Dalvi
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 134)

Abstract

UPDATED—2019/01/05 07:57:47. Sonic environment consisting of various sounds ranging from music and natural sounds to artificial sounds is an integral part of any geography. It is a reflection of people living in the location as well as an influencer of culture in that location. To assess the perception of a person or people of context offered by that location, a soundscape assessment is performed that majorly involve Likert-based questions for pleasantness, annoyance, appropriateness, and so forth. We propose a qualitative method to assess soundscapes from a cultural point of view derived and tweaked from existing methods and tools like the Swedish soundscape quality protocol (SSQP). The method stands as a counterpart of qualitative soundscape assessment approaches like the SSQP, however, it provides richer insights into the perception of the soundscape with its effects, sound characteristics, and cultural meanings. The developed method is also deployed to a field study in Phulenagar, an urban slum of Mumbai. Regions such as these, occupied by people of low socioeconomic stratum have rich sonic interactions because of small residences and proximity of residences. They also offer rich soundscape which is created and affected by sounds generated from various cultural, social, and economic sources and activities. The analyzed results are presented in the form of insights.

Keywords

Human-centered computing Collaborative and social computing Design and evaluation methods Ethnographic studies User studies 

References

  1. 1.
    Schafer, R.M.: Tuning of the world, p. 7. Destiny books. Rochester, Vermont: Destiny Books (1977)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO 12913–1. Acoustics - Soundscape - Part 1: Definition and conceptual framework. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeon, J.Y., Hong, J.Y. Lavandier, C., Lafon, J., Axelsson, S., Hurtig, M.: A Cross-national comparison in assessment of Urban Park Soundscapes in France, Korea, and Sweden through Laboratory Experiments. Appl. Acoust. 133:107–17 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steele, D., Bild, E., Tarlao, C., Martín, I.L., Cubero, J.I., Guastavino C.: A comparison of soundscape evaluation methods in a large urban park in Montreal. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress on Acoustics (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindborg, P.: A Taxonomy of sound sources in restaurants. Appl. Acoust. 110: 297310 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.03.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Axelsson, Ö., Nilsson, M.E., Berglund, B.: The Swedish soundscape-quality protocol. J. Acoust Soc Am.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4709112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cain, R., Jennings, P., Poxon, J.: The development and application of the emotional dimensions of a soundscape. Appl. Acoust., Appl. Soundscapes: Recent Adv. Soundscape Res. 74(2):232–39 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernard, R.H.: Cultural domain analysis in analysing qualitative data, p. 172. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDC School of Design IIT BombayBombayIndia

Personalised recommendations