Advertisement

Connected Us! How Social Motives Determine DIY Behaviorism in Rural Base of the Pyramid Communities

  • Prarthana MajumdarEmail author
  • Sharmistha Banerjee
  • Jan-Carel Diehl
  • J. M. L. Van Engelen
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 134)

Abstract

Social influence has long been known to be a powerful determinant of individuals’ behavior. In collectivist societies such as rural Base of the Pyramid (BoP) communities, social influence can play an active role in the performances of need-based Do-It-Yourself (DIY) practices for survival. Several scholars have studied DIY communities though Ryan and Deci’s Self-Determination theory that explained how relatedness needs motivate DIY in online forums, hackerspaces, and maker communities. However, not much research has been done on how social influence shapes DIY behaviorism. In this paper, we focus on the BoP and present a study conducted in five rural BoP communities in India. Our research studied how, in such communities, an individual’s propensity to do DIY is influenced by others in their network. Through contextual enquiry, we investigated about the social motives that come to play when there is peer-to-peer influence for doing DIY. Our results indicate a strong disposition among the members of the community to engage in DIY activities that are pursued by others in their social milieu and the various motives that lead them to do so. In conclusion, we also discuss the implications of such social influences for design and how such motives can be leveraged for the diffusion of DIY products and product systems in such communities.

Keywords

Do-it-yourself DIY behaviorism Rural base of the pyramid Social motives Social influence Motivation—need for affiliation Motivation—need for accuracy 

References

  1. 1.
    Prahalad, C.K.: The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Pearson Education India (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karnani, A.: Fighting Poverty Together: Rethinking Strategies for Business, Governments, and Civil Society to Reduce Poverty, Palgrave Macmillan (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karnani, A.: The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: how the private sector can help alleviate poverty. Calif. Manag. Rev. 49(4), 90–111 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Landrum, N.E.: Advancing the “base of the pyramid” debate. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 1(1), 1–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., Ahuja, S.: Frugal Innovation: Lessons from Carlos Ghosn, CEO, Renault-Nissan. Harvard Bus. Rev. Blog Network http://blogs.hbr.org/2012/07/frugal-innovationlessons-from/. (2012) Accessed on 3 Dec 2013
  6. 6.
    Oosterlaken, I.: Design for development: A capability approach. Des. Issues 25(4), 91–102 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birtchnell, T.: Jugaad as systemic risk and disruptive innovation in India. Contemp. S. Asia 19(4), 357–372 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prabhu, J., Jain, S.: Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: understanding jugaad. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 32(4), 843–868 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kiggundu, M.N., Ji, S.: Global growth companies in emerging economies: new champions, new challenges. J. Bus. Behav. Sci. 19(1), 70–90 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhaduri, S., Kumar, H.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the motivation of ‘grassroot’innovators in India. Mind Soc. 10(1), 27–55 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta, A.K., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P.,… & Chandan, A. Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: articulating social and ethical capital. Futures. 35(9), 975–987 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta, A. K. (2006). From sink to source: The Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations: Technol. Governance, Globalization. 1(3), 49–66Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toffler, A., Alvin, T.: The Third Wave, pp. 32–33. Bantam books, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ranjan, A., Ranjan, M.P. (Eds.). (2009). Handmade in India: A Geographic Encyclopedia of Indian Handicrafts, Abbeville PressGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reubens, R.: Bamboo canopy: creating new reference-points for the craft of the Kotwalia community in India through sustainability. Craft Research 1(1), 11–38 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolf, M., McQuitty, S.: Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS review 1(3–4), 154–170 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolf, M., McQuitty, S.: Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS review 1(3–4), 154–170 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freeman, S.: Immersed In pellet technology: motivation paths of innovative DIYers. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 16(1), 54–80 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lakhani, K.R., Wolf, R.G.: Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Perspectives on free and open source software 1, 3–22 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson B, Gaudet H (1944) The People’s choice: how the voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign (Duell, Sloan and Pearce, New York)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P.F.: Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ (1955)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Troldahl, V.C.: A field test of a modified “two-step flow of communication” model. Public Opin Q 30(4), 609–623 (1966)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim, D.K., Chitnis, K., Vasanti, P.N., Singhal, A.: Opinion leadership in Indian villages and diffusion of e-Choupal. J. Creative Commun. 2(3), 345–360 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ryan, B., Gross, N.C.: The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural sociol. 8(1), 15 (1943)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van den Bulte, C., Lilien, G.L.: Medical innovation revisited: social contagion versus marketing effort. Am. J. Sociol. 106(5), 1409–1435 (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burt, R.S.: Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am. J. Sociol. 92(6), 1287–1335 (1987)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Contractor, N.S., DeChurch, L.A.: Integrating social networks and human social motives to achieve social influence at scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(Supplement 4), 13650–13657 (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College PublishersGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7(2), 117–140 (1954)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sherif, M.: The psychology of social norms (1936)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cartwright, D.: Influence, leadership, control (1965)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117(3), 497 (1995)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Byrne D (1961) Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 62(3):713–715. 61Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baumeister, R.F.: A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychol. Bull. 91(1), 3 (1982)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bakker, J.H.: The Gandhian approach to swadeshi or appropriate technology: a conceptualization in terms of basic needs and equity. J. Agric. Ethics 3(1), 50–88 (1990)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rural Spark. Accessed on 21st May 2018 from URL: http://www.ruralspark.com/
  39. 39.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prarthana Majumdar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sharmistha Banerjee
    • 2
  • Jan-Carel Diehl
    • 1
  • J. M. L. Van Engelen
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations