Advertisement

Devising Product Design Architecture Strategies: Case of HEV Powertrain

  • Manish Chandra
  • Pranab K. Dan
  • Debraj Bhattacharjee
  • Sourabh Mandol
  • Prasenjit Patra
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 134)

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of possible combinations of three transmission systems, namely, Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), Planetary Gear Transmission (PGT), and Dual Clutch Transmission (DCT), to carry out the comparative study of fuel consumption to deduce new gearbox architecture. Modern automotive industry is moving towards greener technology that leads to the introduction of the Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) as electric motor has higher efficiency compared to an IC engine. Different combinations of available transmission systems, viz., CVT-DCT, CVT-PGS, DCT-PGS, and CVT-DCT-PGS are tested in a MATLAB/Simulink environment. From this experimentation, it has been observed that the topology of transmission architecture also influences the fuel consumption apart from the losses in power train. This experimentation utilized the advantages of combining multiple gearbox architecture to develop a new gearbox to achieve maximum fuel efficiency and thereby reducing the carbon footprint. A systematic analysis of multiple gearbox architecture enabled the development of topological layout to achieve desired transmission architecture.

Keywords

Hybrid electric vehicle Automotive transmission Fuel efficiency Carbon footprint 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the authority of PAM Lab, Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship for helping in conducting the experiment using the available infrastructure.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, H., Ma, J., Tong, L., Ma, G., Zheng, Z., Yao, M.: Investigation on the potential of high efficiency for internal combustion engines. Energies, 1–20 (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vacca, F., Pinto, S.D., Karci, A., Gruber, P., Viotto, F., Cavallino, C., Rossi, J., Sorniotti, A.: On the energy efficiency of dual clutch transmissions and automated manual transmissions. Energies 10(10), 1562 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun, Z., Hebbale, K.: Challenges and opportunities in automotive transmission control. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lucente, G., Montanari, M., Rossi, C.: Modelling of an automated manual transmission system. Mechatronics 17(2–3), 73–91 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mondal, S., Bhattacharjee, D., Dan, P.: Robust optimization in determining failure criteria of a planetary gear assembly considering fatigue condition. Struct. Multi. Optim. 53(2), 291–302 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mandol, S., Dan, P., Mondal, M.: Modeling for optimality in design of planetary ring gear to reduce stress development. In: 2018 3rd International Conference for Convergence in Technology, Pune, India (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhattacharjee, D., Bhola, P., Dan, P. (2018) A torque prediction based gearshift controller modelling for HEV. In: 2018 3rd International Conference for Convergence in Technology, Pune (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, G., Zhang, X., Dong, Z.: Powertrain architectures of electrified vehicles: review, classification and comparison. J. Franklin Inst. 352(2), 425–448 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gholizadeh, M., Salmasi, F.R.: Estimation of state of charge, unknown nonlinearities, and state of health of a lithium-ion battery based on a comprehensive unobservable model. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 61(3), 1335–1344 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jazar, R.: Vehicle dynamics: theory and application. Springer, Berlin (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oglieve, C., Mohammadpour, M., Rahnejat, H.: Optimisation of the vehicle transmission and the gear-shifting strategy for the minimum fuel consumption and the minimum nitrogen oxide emissions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Automobile Eng. 231(7), 883–899 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vehicle technology simulation and analysis tools, NREL [Online]. Available: https://www.nrel.gov/transportation/systems-analysis-tools.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2018
  13. 13.
    Bhattacharjee, D., Bhola, P., Dan, P.: A heuristic synthesis of multistage planetary gearbox layout for automotive transmission. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K: J. Multi-body Dyn. 1464419318759893 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chandra, M., Mandol, S., Bhattacharjee, D., Dan, P.: Improving structural stability of spar gear trains through analytic study of gear interaction. In: 2018 3rd International conference for Convergence in Technology, Pune, India (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manish Chandra
    • 1
  • Pranab K. Dan
    • 1
  • Debraj Bhattacharjee
    • 1
  • Sourabh Mandol
    • 1
  • Prasenjit Patra
    • 1
  1. 1.Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, IIT KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations