Advertisement

Study on Fabrication and Compressive Properties of Mg/Al-Ordered Structure Composites

  • Han Wang
  • Yu Fu
  • Mingming Su
  • Hai HaoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 217)

Abstract

As a special kind of gas/metal matrix composites with potential application prospects, porous metals have high specific strength integrated with special functional properties. However, since the gas phase in porous metals hardly contributes to the absolute mechanical properties, the properties of porous metals still need to be improved. In this study, Mg/Al-ordered structure composites were prepared successfully by infiltrating the commercial pure magnesium into the ordered porous aluminum to replace the gas phase with the purpose of improving compressive properties. Aiming at decreasing casting defects, the infiltration process of Mg/Al-ordered structure composites was simulated by the software ProCAST to optimize the infiltration temperature and preheated temperature. The results of the quasi-static compression test indicated that the stress-strain curves of Mg/Al-ordered structure composites were similar to the porous metals. There was still stress plateau on the stress-strain curve. Furthermore, the compressive strength and plateau stress were improved obviously compared with the ordered porous aluminum. During the compression deformation, the ordered porous aluminum acted as the skeleton with great plasticity and ductility while the commercial pure magnesium as filler expressed lightweight and high strength. Co-continuous commercial pure aluminum and magnesium with ordered structure led to excellent compressive properties of Mg/Al-ordered structure composites.

Keywords

Porous metals Ordered structure Filler Metal matrix composites Process optimization Compressive properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant numbers 2016YFB0701204).

References

  1. 1.
    J. Banhart, Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog. Mater. Sci. 46(6), 559–632 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Jiang, N.Q. Zhao, C.S. Shi, J.J. Li, Processing of open cell aluminum foams with tailored porous morphology. Scr. Mater. 53(6), 781–785 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Kenesei, C. Kadar, Z. Rajkovits, J. Lendvai, The influence of cell-size distribution on the plastic deformation in metal foams. Scr. Mater. 50(2), 295–300 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. He, Y. Zhang, G. Dai, J. Jiang, Preparation of density-graded aluminum foam. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 618, 496–499 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Huang, H. Wang, D. Yang, F. Ye, Z.P. Lu, Effects of scandium additions on mechanical properties of cellular Al-based foams. Intermetallics 28, 71–76 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Xia, H. Feng, X. Zhang, W. Zhao, The compressive properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with different Mn additions. Mater. Des. 51, 797–802 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Zhou, Z. Gao, A.M. Cuitino, W.O. Soboyejo, Effects of heat treatment on the compressive deformation behavior of open cell aluminum foams. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 386(1–2), 118–128 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    X. Xia, W. Zhao, X. Feng, H. Feng, X. Zhang, Effect of homogenizing heat treatment on the compressive properties of closed-cell Mg alloy foams. Mater. Des. 49, 19–24 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.F. Cheng, F.S. Han, Compressive behavior and energy absorbing characteristic of open cell aluminum foam filled with silicate rubber. Scr. Mater. 49(6), 583–586 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y.W. Kwon, R.E. Cooke, C. Park, Representative unit-cell models for open-cell metal foams with or without elastic filler. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 343(1), 63–70 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Yuan, X. Chen, W. Zhou, Y. Li, Study on quasi-static compressive properties of aluminum foam-epoxy resin composite structures. Compos. B Eng. 79, 301–310 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Li, Y. Wei, L. Hou, C. Guo, S. Yang, Fabrication and compressive behaviour of an aluminium foam composite. J. Alloy. Compd. 649, 76–81 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Q. Li, G. Jiang, C. Wang, J. Dong, G. He, Mechanical degradation of porous titanium with entangled structure filled with biodegradable magnesium in Hanks’ solution. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 57, 349–354 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S.N. Esfahani, M.T. Andani, N.S. Moghaddam, R. Mirzaeifar, M. Elahinia, Independent tuning of stiffness and toughness of additively manufactured titanium-polymer composites: simulation, fabrication, and experimental studies. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 238, 22–29 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations