Reliable Data Delivery with Extended IPV4 Using Low-Power Personal Area Network

  • Shambhavi MishraEmail author
  • Pawan Singh
  • Anil Kumar Tiwari
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 904)


In most of the industries and research and developments, IoT is rapidly increasing technology because of its efficiency feature in the M2M communication. The industries and R&D tell that it is most cost-effective, efficient, optimization in communication, and till 2025 it will optimize every device. IoT is mainly the interconnection of embedded devices that can connect the physical world to virtual work with objects and things. It helps to access the data or information remotely at anytime, anywhere, etc. The IoT technology has a technical concept for communicating between M2M such as smart home, remote security control, remote devices monitoring, smart healthcare system, etc. There are various enabling technologies that help to communicate between the embedded devices through protocols such as RFID, addressing scheme, WSN, etc. Approximately, 4.3 billions of IP addresses (232) have been provided by IPv4. There is topical development of the Internet and its objects forced to find best solution for IPv4 extension. As a result, IPv6 is gaining lots of preference in research and it is expected that IPV6 will provide optimized performance by 2025. This paper proposes a current solution in the existing IP requirement with a new IP format which is compatible between IPV4 and IPV6. The proposed method is developed and analyzed using Contiki operating system platform with a Cooja simulator.


Internet of Things (IoT) Enabling technologies Cooja IPv4 IPv6 


  1. 1.
    Evans, D.: Internet of Things. Cisco,…/IoT_IBSG_0411FINAL.pdf
  2. 2.
    Giusto, D., Iera, A., Morabito, G., Atzori, L. (eds): The Internet of Things. Springer J (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shen, G., Liu, B.: The visions, technologies, applications and security issues of Internet of Things. In: International Conference IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prodanoff, Z.G.: Optimal frame size analysis for framed Slotted ALOHA based RFID networks.
  5. 5.
    Akyildiz, I.F, Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: A survey on sensor networks. IEEE e-Commun. Mag. (2002) (Atlanta in Georgia Institute of Technology, USA)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akyildiz, I.F, Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: A survey: wireless sensor networks. Comput. Netw. (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zorzi, M., Gluhak, A., Lange, S., Bassi, A.: Future Internet of Things: a wireless- and mobility-related view. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 17 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu, B., Liu, Y., He, X., Tao, Y.: On the architecture and address mapping mechanism of IoT. In: The International Conference of IEEE at Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma, Y.-W., Lai, C.-F., Huang, Y.-M., Chen, J.-L.: Mobile RFID with IPv6 for phone services. In: The IEEE Proceedings ISCE2009, pp. 169–170 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malche, T., Maheshwary, P.: Harnessing the Internet of Things (IoT): a review. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. J. 5(8) (2015). ISSN: 2277 128XGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Contiki: The Open Source OS” the topic available at the link 2016:
  12. 12.
    “Contiki: The Tiny OS” the link available 2016:

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shambhavi Mishra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pawan Singh
    • 1
  • Anil Kumar Tiwari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAmity UniversityNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations