Robust Regulatory Policies for Capitalism

Twenty-First-Century Political Science’s Political Economy
  • Rainer EisfeldEmail author


During the 1980s and 1990s, a neo-liberal (actually, largely laissez-faire, or “Manchester”-liberal) discourse bent on cutting welfare expenditures and government supervision of the capitalist economy became increasingly hegemonic. Under its impact, government and market players alike pushed for the realization of recipes aimed at “slimming down” the role of states.


  1. AFP [Agence France Presse] (2014): “German Stumbling Block to Transatlantic Trade Talks.” Digital Journal, March 27., accessed November 15, 2017.
  2. AFTINET [Australian Fair Trade & Investment Network] (2012): “Australian High Court Rules Against Big Tobacco on Plain Packaging”. Media Release., accessed November 15, 2017.
  3. Alstadsæter, Annette/Johannesen, Niels/Zucman, Gabriel (2017): “Tax Evaders Exposed: Why the Super-Rich Are Even Richer Than We Thought.” The Guardian, June 14, 2017., accessed December 16, 2017.
  4. Asato, Jessica (2011): “Why Did Labour’s Public Sector Reforms Fail to Transform Communities?” In: Patrick Diamond/Michael Kenny (eds.): Reassessing New Labour. Market, State and Society under Blair and Brown. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell in Association with The Political Quarterly, S177–S186.Google Scholar
  5. Atkins, Curtis (2016): “The Third Way International.” Jacobin Magazine, November 2., accessed December 6, 2017.
  6. Bitler, Marianne/Hoynes, Hilary (2016): “The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? The Safety Net and Poverty in the Great Recession.” Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 34, 403–444.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, Tony/Schröder, Gerhard (1998): Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte. Working Documents No. 2. Johannesburg: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Blumenthal, Paul (2009): “How Congress Rushed a Bill that helped Bring the Economy to Its Knees.” Huffington Post, May 11, 2009., accessed October 16, 2017.
  9. Bonesmo Frederiksen, Kaja (2012): “Income Inequality in the European Union”. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 952, April. Paris: OECD Publishing., accessed December 10, 2017.
  10. Brookings Institution (2014): “Reformed Welfare Program Effective During Great Recession”. Brookings Economic Studies,, accessed October 20, 2017.
  11. Bundesverfassungsgericht (2016): “Applications for a Preliminary Injunction in the ‘CETA’ Proceedings Unsuccessful.” Press Release No. 71/2016, October 13., accessed Nov. 2, 2017.
  12. Cashore, Benjamin/Auld, Graeme/Newsom, Deanna (2004): Governing Through Markets. Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. CCPA [Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives] (2015): “NAFTA Chapter 11 Investor-State Disputes to January 1, 2015.”, accessed November 13, 2017.
  14. Cerny, Philip G. (1999): “Globalization and the Erosion of Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 36, 1–26.Google Scholar
  15. Charnovitz, Steve (1994): “The NAFTA Environmental Side Agreement: Implications for Environmental Cooperation, Trade Policy, and American Treatymaking.” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, Vol. 257, 1–62,, accessed October 30, 2017.
  16. Compa, Lane (1994): “American Trade Unions and NAFTA”. In: H. Totsuka et al. (eds.): International Trade Unionism at the Current Stage of Economic Globalization and Regionalization. Tokyo: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, 97–117., accessed October 30, 2017.
  17. Cŏté, Christine (2014): A Chilling Effect? The Impact of International Investor Agreements on National regulatory Autonomy in the Areas of Health, Safety and the Environment. PhD Thesis submitted to LSE., accessed October 30, 2017.
  18. Cox, Christopher (2008): “Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Cox Announces End of Consolidated Supervise Entities Program”. September 26., accessed October 1, 2017.
  19. Daripa, Arup et al. (2012): “Labour’s Record on Financial Regulation”. Birkbeck College (University of London) Faculty Papers., accessed November 21, 2017. Later published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 29 (2013), 71–94.
  20. Dattu, Riyaz/Pavic, Sonja (2017): “Canada Seeks to Reform NAFTA’s Investor-State Dispute Settlement Chapter.” OSLER Resources, August 23., accessed November 15, 2017.
  21. Deutsche Bundesbank (2015): “Structural Developments in the German Banking Sector”, in: Monthly Report, April, 35–60.Google Scholar
  22. Eisfeld, Rainer (2011): “How Political Science Might Regain Relevance and Obtain an Audience: A Manifesto for the 21st Century”. European Political Science, Vol. 10, 220–225.Google Scholar
  23. Elson, Anthony (2017): The Global Financial Crisis in Retrospect. Evolution, Resolution, and Lessons for Prevention. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Fernández-Armesto, Juan (2012): Quoted in: Corporate Europe Observatory: “Who Guards the Guardians?”, November 27., accessed November 15, 2017.
  25. Gaukrodger, David/Gordon, Kathryn (2012): “Investor-State Dispute Settlement.” OECD Working Papers on International Investment. 2012/03. Paris., accessed November 12, 2017.
  26. Giddens, Anthony (2010): “The Rise and Fall of New Labour.” New Perspectives Quarterly. Summer Issue, 32–37.Google Scholar
  27. Grimm, Nicole L. (1998): “The North American Agreement of Labor Cooperation and Its Effects on Women Working in Mexican Maquiladoras.” American University Law Review, Vol. 48, 179–228.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, John F./Yang, John E. (1996): “Clinton to Sign Bill Overhauling Welfare”. Washington Post, August 1., accessed October 18, 2017.
  29. Haugsvær, Steinar (2003): “The Norwegian Study on Power and Democracy: Main Conclusions.” August 26.
  30. Herz, Wilfried (2005): “Das größte Geschenk aller Zeiten.” DIE ZEIT No. 37 (September 8)., accessed December 7, 2017.
  31. Hirst, Paul (2004): “What is Globalization?” In: Fredrik Engelstad/Øyvind Østerud (eds.): Power and Democracy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 151–168.Google Scholar
  32. Hoynes, Hilary (2017): “Interview.” The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, June 1., accessed October 20, 2017.
  33. Jones, Gareth A. (2017): “The Geographies of ‘Capital in the Twenty-First Century’: Inequality, Political Economy, and Space.” In: Heather Boushey/J. Bradford DeLong/Marshall Steinbaum (eds.): After Piketty. The Agenda for Economics and Inequality. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press 2017, 280–303.Google Scholar
  34. Kay, Tamara (2011): NAFTA and the Politics of Labor Transnationalism. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Keitel, Jannika (2015): “Germany’s Welfare System: An Overview.” Policy in Practice, April 14., accessed December 10, 2017.
  36. Kellner, Peter (2011): “The Death of Class-Based Politics”: Patrick Diamond/Michael Kenny (eds.): Reassessing New Labour. Market, State and Society under Blair and Brown. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell in Association with The Political Quarterly, S152-S164.Google Scholar
  37. King, Desmond/Wickham-Jones, Mark (1999): “From Clinton to Blair: The Democratic (Party) Origins of Welfare to Work”. Political Quarterly, Vol. 70, 62–74.Google Scholar
  38. Koch, Ed (2012): “It’s Time to Reexamine the Welfare Reform Law of 1996.”, accessed October 20, 2017.
  39. Krugman, Paul (2011): “The Profession and the Crisis”. Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 37, 307–312.Google Scholar
  40. Lees, Charles (2000): The Red-Green Coalition in Germany. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Li, Quan/Reuveny, Rafael (2003): “Economic Globalization and Democracy: An Empirical Analysis”. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 33, 29–54.Google Scholar
  42. Mestral, Armand de (2015): “When Does the Exception Become the Rule? Conserving Regulatory Space under CETA.” Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 18, 641–654.Google Scholar
  43. Morgan, Glenn (2012): “Constructing Financial Markets: Reforming Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets in the Aftermath of the Financial Crisis.” In: Wyn Grant/Graham K. Wilson (eds.): The Consequences of the Global Financial Crisis. The Rhetoric of Reform and Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67–87.Google Scholar
  44. Naumann, Michael (2017): Glück gehabt. Ein Leben. Hamburg: Hoffmann & Campe.Google Scholar
  45. Noble, Charles (1997): Welfare As We Knew It. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Olivet, Cecilia/Villareal, Alberto (2016): “Who Really Won the Legal Battle between Philip Morris and Uruguay?” Guardian, July 28., accessed November 15, 2017.
  47. Osterberg, David/Ajami, Fouad (1971): “The Multinational Corporation: Expanding the Frontiers of World Politics”. Journal of Conflict Resolution, No. 15, 457–470.Google Scholar
  48. Piketty, Thomas (2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge/London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Puri, Poonam (2013): “Canada: ‘Bank Bashing’ Is a Popular Sport.” In: Suzanne J. Konzelmann/Marc Fovarque-Davies (eds.): Banking Systems in the Crisis: The Faces of Liberal Capitalism. London/New York: Routledge, 155–185.Google Scholar
  50. Putzel, James (2005): “Globalization, Liberalization, and Prospects for the State.” International Political Science Review, Vol. 26, 5–16.Google Scholar
  51. PWG Report (1999): Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets and the Commodity Exchange Act. Report of the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets. Accompanying Letters to the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate, 1–2., accessed October 16, 2017.
  52. Ringen, Stein (2004): “Wealth and Decay. The Norwegian Study of Power and Democracy.” Times Literary Supplement, February 13, 3–5.Google Scholar
  53. Ritholtz, Barry (2012): “Repeal of Glass-Steagall: Not a Cause, But a Multiplier.” Washington Post, August 4, 2012., accessed October 16, 2017.
  54. Roberts, Dan (2014): “Wall Street Deregulation Pushed by Clinton Advisers, Documents Reveal”. The Guardian, April 19., accessed October 2, 2017.
  55. Romano, Flavio (2006): “Clinton and Blair: The Economics of the Third Way.” Journal of Economic and Social Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, 79–94.Google Scholar
  56. Salacuse, Jeswald W. (2010): “The Emerging Global Regime for Investment”. Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 51, 427–473.Google Scholar
  57. Sanati, Cyrus (2009): “10 Years Later, Looking at Repeal of Glass-Steagall.” New York Times, November 12., accessed October 16, 2017.
  58. Shihata, Ibrahim (1986): “Towards a Greater Depoliticization of Investment Disputes”. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1–25., accessed November 8, 2017.Google Scholar
  59. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2008): “Capitalist Fools.” Vanity Fair, December 9., accessed August 26, 2017.
  60. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2012): The Price of Inequality. New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, Robert (1999): “Some Comments on the Blair/Schroeder ‘Third Way/Neue Mitte’ Manifesto”. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, Vol. 5, 411–414., accessed December 6, 2017.Google Scholar
  62. Tienhaara, Kyla (2011): “Regulatory Chill and the Threat of Arbitration: A View from Political science”. In: Chester Brown/Kate Miles (eds.): Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011, 606–627.Google Scholar
  63. Tietje, Christian/Baetens, Freya (2014): “The Impact of Investor-State-Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership”. Study Prepared for the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, June 24., accessed November 5, 2017.
  64. Van Harten, Gus (2014): “Investor-State Arbitration.”, January 20, accessed October 28, 2017. [OUP: Oxford University Press].
  65. Vargas, Jorge A. (1994): “NAFTA, the Chiapas Rebellion, and the Emergence of Mexican Ethnic Law”. California Western International Law Journal, Vol. 25, 1–79.Google Scholar
  66. Weaver, R. Kent/Gais, Thomas (2002): “State Policy Choices Under Welfare Reform”. Brookings Institution, April 2., accessed October 19, 2017.
  67. Wellhausen, Rachel L. (2016): “Recent Trends in Investor-State Dispute Settlement.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 7, 117–135.Google Scholar
  68. Williams, Shirley (2011): “Shirley Williams in Conversation with Tony Wright.” In: Patrick Diamond/Michael Kenny (eds.): Reassessing New Labour. Market, State and Society under Blair and Brown. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell in Association with The Political Quarterly, S187-S191.Google Scholar
  69. Wilson, Graham K./Grant, Wyn (2012): “Preface”, “Introduction” and “Conclusion”. In: Wyn Grant/Graham K. Wilson (eds.): The Consequences of the Global Financial Crisis. The Rhetoric of Reform and Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, V-VII, 1–14, 247–260.Google Scholar
  70. Wilson, Graham K. (2012): “The United States: The Strange Survival of (Neo)Liberalism”. In: Wyn Grant/Graham K. Wilson (eds.): The Consequences of the Global Financial Crisis. The Rhetoric of Reform and Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–66.Google Scholar
  71. Zucman, Gabriel (2014): “Taxing across Borders: Tracking Personal Wealth and Corporate Profits.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 28, 121–148.Google Scholar
  72. Zucman, Gabriel (2016): “Sanctions for Offshore Tax Havens, Transparency at Home.” New York Times, April 7, 2016., accessed December 16, 2017.
  73. Zucman, Gabriel (2017): “How Corporations and the Wealthy Avoid Taxes (and How to Stop Them).” New York Times, November 10, 2017., accessed December 16, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachbereich 1Osnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations