A Voting Scheme in Blockchain Based on Threshold Group Signature

  • Lipeng WangEmail author
  • Mingsheng Hu
  • Zijuan Jia
  • Bei GongEmail author
  • Yanyan Yang
  • Xinxin Liu
  • Wenjun Cui
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 960)


Traditional voting schemes are used for the credit evaluation and authentication. During the voting process, the contents need to be verified through the signature algorithms. Traditional signature schemes for voting scenes exist several drawbacks such as distrust of central nodes for the group signature and inefficiency for the ring signature. A trusted center selection scheme is proposed based on Dynamic Bayesian Network, which can be adapted in the isomerized blockchain. By introducing the historical interaction window, the aging factor, and the penalty factor, the adaptive trusted metrics can be obtained through aggregating the direct credibility and the indirect credibility. A new threshold group signature scheme is introduced through collaboration between users and the trusted centers. In order to protect the user identities, the blinding process is proposed. In case of compromising, the trusted centers create redundant backup, and can be updated with the proposed selection scheme. Security analysis shows that the proposed signature, whose difficulty is equivalent to the discrete logarithm of the elliptic curve, achieves a high level of anonymity and can resist impersonation attacks. Computational complexity analysis shows that the new method with low computational cost and transmission efficiency can be effectively adapted to the isomerized blockchain scene.


Blockchain Confidential computation Threshold group signature Dynamic Bayesian Network 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Funds (U1304614, U1204703), the construct program of the key discipline in Zhengzhou Normal University, aid program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team of Zhengzhou Normal University, Henan Province Education Science Plan General Topic “Research on Trusted Degree Certification Based on Blockchain” ((2018)-JKGHYB-0279).


  1. 1.
    Liehuang, Z., et al.: Survey on privacy preserving techniques for blockchain technology. J. Comput. Res. Dev. 54(10), 2170–2186 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., Rubin, A.D.: Zerocoin: anonymous distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, San Francisco, pp. 397–411 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baohua, Y., Chang, C.: Principle. Design and Application of Blockchain. China Machine Press, Beijing (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biryukov, A., Khovratovich, D., Pustogarov, I.: Deanonymisation of Clients in Bitcoin P2P Network. Eprint Arxiv, 15–29 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koshy, P., Koshy, D., Mcdaniel, P.: An analysis of anonymity in Bitcoin using P2P network traffic. In: International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Barbados, pp. 469–485 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marsh, S.P.: Formalising trust as computational concept (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Almenarez, F., Marin, A., Diaz, D., Sanchez, J.: Developing a model for trust management in pervasive devices. In: IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, p. 267 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Melaye, D., Demazeau, Y.: Bayesian dynamic trust model. In: International Central and Eastern European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, Budapest 2005, pp. 480–489 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun, Y.L., Yu, W., Han, Z., Liu, K.J.R.: Information theoretic framework of trust modeling and evaluation for ad hoc networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 24(2), 305–317 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahamed, S.I., Sharmin, M.: A trust-based secure service discovery (TSSD) model for pervasive computing. Comput. Commun. 31(18), 4281–4293 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chun-Mei, G., Qiang, J., Huai-Min, W., Quan-Yuan, W.: Repeated game theory based penalty-incentive mechanism in internet-based virtual computing environment. J. Softw. 21(12), 3042–3055 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liang, H., Wu, W.: Research of trust evaluation model based on dynamic Bayesian network. J. Commun. 34(9), 68–76 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liquan, C., Zheng, Z., Muyang, W., Xiaoyan, S.: A threadhold group signature scheme for mobile internet application. Chin. J. Comput. 41(5), 1–18 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, T.S., Hsiao, T.C., Chen, T.L.: An efficient threshold group signature scheme. In: TENCON 2004, pp. 13–16 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ya, P.: Research on Threshold Digital Signature Theory and Application. Zhongshan University, China (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dong, X., Jiajia, L., Zhonghua, S.: A new threshold signature scheme based on elliptic curve cryptosystem. J. Hangzhou Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 12(1), 57–60 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, H.W., Xie, W.X., Jian-Ping, Y.U., Peng, Z.: Efficiency identity-based threshold group signature scheme. J. Commun. 30(5), 122–127 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jie, Y., Xuri, Y., Wujun, Z.: Research on group signature with threshold value based on elliptic curve. J. Southeast Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 38, 43–46 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chung, Y.F., Chen, T.L., Chen, T.S., Chen, C.S.: A study on efficient group-oriented signature schemes for realistic application environment. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control. Ijicic 8(4), 2713–2727 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gennaro, R., Jarecki, S., Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Robust threshold DSS signatures. In: Maurer, U. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1070, pp. 354–371. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gennaro, R., Jarecki, S., Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Secure distributed key generation for discrete-log based cryptosystems. In: International Conference on Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques, pp. 295–310 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bonneau, J., et al.: Securing Bitcoin wallets via a new DSA/ECDSA threshold signature scheme (2015).
  23. 23.
    Si, C.: Research on Anonymity and Key Management of Bitcoin. Xidian University, Xi’an (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stinson, D.R., Dengguo, F.: Cryptography Theory and Practice. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abe, M., Fujisaki, E.: How to date blind signatures. In: Kim, K., Matsumoto, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1163, pp. 244–251. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shamir, A.: How to Share a Secret. Commun. ACM 22(11), 612–613 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Blakley, G.R.: Safeguarding cryptographic keys. In: AFIPS, p. 313 (1979)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boldyreva, A.: Threshold signatures, multisignatures and blind signatures based on the Gap-Diffie-Hellman-Group Signature Scheme. In: International Workshop on Public Key Cryptography, pp. 31–46 (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cai, Y., Zhang, X., Jiang, N.: A novel identity-based threshold signature. Acta Electron. Sin. 37(4A), 102–105 (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dahshan, H., Kamal, A., Rohiem, A.: A threshold blind digital signature scheme using elliptic curve dlog-based cryptosystem. In: Vehicular Technology Conference, Glasgow, pp. 1–5 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Science and TechnologyZhengzhou Normal UniversityZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations