Advertisement

Autoencoder-Based on Anomaly Detection with Intrusion Scoring for Smart Factory Environments

  • Gimin Bae
  • Sunggyun Jang
  • Minseop Kim
  • Inwhee JoeEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 931)

Abstract

The industry 4.0 and Industrial IoT is leading new industrial revolution. Industrial IoT technologies make more reliable and sustainable products than traditional products in automation industry. Industrial IoT devices transfer data between one another. This concept is need for advanced connectivity and intelligent security services. We focus on the security threat in Industrial IoT. The general security systems enable to detect normal security threat. However, it is not easy to detect anomaly threat or network intrusion or new hacking methods. In the paper, we propose autoencoder (AE) using the deep learning based anomaly detection with invasion scoring for the smart factory environments. We have analysis F-Score and accuracy between the Density Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) and the autoencoder using the KDD data set. We have used real data from Korea steel companies and the collected data is general data such as temperature, stream flow, the shocks of machines, and etc. Finally, experiments show that the proposed autoencoder model is better than DBSCAN.

Keywords

Anomaly detection Intrusion detection Scoring Autoencoder DBSCAN Smart factory Industrial IoT 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Technology development Program (S2521883) funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea).

References

  1. 1.
    Buczak, A.L., Guven, E.: A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18(2), 1153–1176 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Byres, E., Lowe, J.: The myths and facts behind cyber security risks for industrial control systems. In: Proceedings of the VDE Kongress, vol. 116 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, J.P.: Computer security threat monitoring and surveillance. Technical Report, James P. Anderson Company (1980)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., Kumar, V.: Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(3), 15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mukkamala, S., Janoski, G., Sung, A.: Intrusion detection using neural networks and support vector machines. In: 2002 Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2002, vol. 2. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsai, C.-F., et al.: Intrusion detection by machine learning: a review. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(10), 11994–12000 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    An, J., Cho, S.: Variational autoencoder based anomaly detection using reconstruction probability. SNU Data Mining Center, Technical Report (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shone, N., et al.: A deep learning approach to network intrusion detection. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2(1), 41–50 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hinton, G.E., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786), 504–507 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    KDD Cup 1999. http://kdd.ics.uci.edu/databases/kddcup99/kddcup99.html. Accessed October 2007
  11. 11.
    Lippmann, R., Haines, Joshua W., Fried, David J., Korba, J., Das, K.: Analysis and results of the 1999 DARPA off-line intrusion detection evaluation. In: Debar, H., Mé, L., Wu, Felix (eds.) RAID 2000. LNCS, vol. 1907, pp. 162–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39945-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olusola, A.A., Oladele, A.S., Abosede, D.O.: Analysis of KDD ’99 intrusion detection dataset for selection of relevance features. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 1. (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Özgür, A., Erdem, H.: A review of KDD99 dataset usage in intrusion detection and machine learning between 2010 and 2015. PeerJ PrePrints (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fawcett, T.: An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27(8), 861–874 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abadi, M., et al.: TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, 2015. tensorflow.org. Accessed 21 Nov 2016

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gimin Bae
    • 1
  • Sunggyun Jang
    • 1
  • Minseop Kim
    • 1
  • Inwhee Joe
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Computer and SoftwareHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations