Advertisement

Investigating Practising Science Teachers’ pPCK and ePCK Development as a Result of Collaborative CoRe Design

  • Jared CarpendaleEmail author
  • Anne Hume
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reports on one case from a cross-case study exploring how collaborative Content Representation (CoRe) design can be used to develop science teachers’ personal and enacted pedagogical content knowledge (pPCK and ePCK). These conceptualisations of PCK are components of the Refined Consensus Model (RCM) of PCK (see Chap.  2 of this book). The cross-case study focused on three cases involving science teachers with a limited physics background. Each case study teacher’s initial pPCK and ePCK for teaching an Electricity and Magnetism topic to a class of 14-year-old New Zealand students were determined prior to the CoRe design intervention using data from interviews and classroom observations. These teachers then engaged in a collaborative CoRe design workshop with other science teachers and experienced physics teachers, where individuals shared their PCK with the whole group and together developed an agreed-upon collective PCK (cPCK) for teaching this topic. The case teachers were subsequently observed teaching a second class (similar age and ability students) and re-interviewed about their pPCK and ePCK development as a result of collaborative CoRe design. The findings from the reported case study reveal that the intervention had a discernible impact on the teacher’s pPCK and ePCK, notably: deeper understanding of physics concepts; new ways to represent concepts to students; and greater awareness and consideration of what students may be thinking in their lessons.

References

  1. Alonzo, A. C., Kobarg, M., & Seidel, T. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge as reflected in teacher-student interactions: Analysis of two video cases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1211–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Daehler, K. R., Heller, J. I., & Wong, N. (2015). Supporting growth of pedagogical content knowledge in science. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 45–59). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Gardner, A. L., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2011, April). A PCK rubric to measure teachers’ knowledge of inquiry-based instruction using three data sources. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  9. Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teaching professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Henze, I., & van Driel, J. H. (2015). Toward a more comprehensive way to capture PCK in its complexity. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 120–134). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hume, A. (2010). CoRes as tools for promoting pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of novice chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education in New Zealand, 119, 13–19.Google Scholar
  13. Hume, A. (2015). Getting to the core of the matter: Developing a primary school’s science plan. New Zealand Science Teacher, 134, 18–22.Google Scholar
  14. Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes—A strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 341–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9168-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2013). Enhancing the practicum experience for pre-service chemistry teachers through collaborative CoRe design with mentor teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2107–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hume, A., Eames, C., Williams, J., & Lockley, J. (2013). The benefits of collaborative content representation (CoRe) design. SET: Information for Teachers, 2, 35–43.Google Scholar
  17. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014a). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014b). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, E., Brown, M. N., Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (Vol. 6, pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. NZQA. (2010). Achievement standard physics 1.3: Demonstrate understanding of aspects of electricity and magnetism. AS90937 version 3. Retrieved August 22, 2016, from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/nqfdocs/ncea-resource/achievements/2015/as90937.pdf.
  26. Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Duit, R. (2014). Paradigms in science education research. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Watts, M., & Ebbutt, D. (1987). More than the sum of the parts: Research methods in group interviewing. British Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations