Advertisement

Bacillus spp.: As Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria

  • Estibaliz Sansinenea
Chapter

Abstract

There is an increasing demand on the productivity of crops, and the use of biofertilizers in the production plays an important role as a supplement to improve the growth and yield of several agricultural plants. Plant growth results from interaction of roots with the environment. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to facilitate plant nutrient acquisition and can also act as biocontrol agents by suppressing soilborne diseases. The mechanisms by which these bacteria act are multiple and diverse. Several Bacillus species have been identified as plant growth-promoting bacteria since they suppress pathogens or otherwise promote plant growth. Improvements in plant health and productivity are mediated by three different ecological mechanisms: production of antifungals that cause antagonism of pest and pathogens, secretion of compounds that promote the plant growth and stimulation of plant host defences inducing the plant systemic resistance. The present review indicates the role of Bacillus spp. as PGPR with biological promotion of different characteristics of plant growth.

Keywords

PGPR Bacillus Antagonism Secondary metabolites 

References

  1. Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS (2008) Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res 163:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almaghrabi OA, Massoud SI, Abdelmoneim TS (2013) Influence of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on tomato plant growth and nematode reproduction under greenhouse conditions. Saudi J Biol Sci 20:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arachchilage APW, Wang F, Feyer V, Plekan O, Prince KCJ (2012) Photoelectron spectra and structures of three cyclic dipeptides: PhePhe, TyrPro and HisGly. Chem Phys 135:1243301–1243301Google Scholar
  4. Arguelles-Arias A, Ongena M, Halimi B, Lara Y, Brans A, Joris B, Fickers P (2009) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GA1 as a source of potent antibiotics and other secondary metabolites for biocontrol of plant pathogens. Microb Cell Factories 8:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE (2010) How the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum promotes plant growth – a critical assessment. Adv Agron 108:77–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Gen Mol Biol 35:1044–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bisen K, Keswani C, Mishra S, Saxena A, Rakshit A, Singh HB (2015) Unrealized potential of seed biopriming for versatile agriculture. In: Rakshit A, Singh HB, Sen A (eds) Nutrient use efficiency: from basics to advances. Springer, New Delhi, pp 193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borriss R (2011) Use of plant-associated Bacillus strains as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology: plant growth responses. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bottini R, Cassan F, Piccoli P (2004) Gibberellin production by bacteria and its involvement in plant growth promotion and yield increase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro-Sowinski S, Herschkovitz Y, Okon Y, Jurkevitch E (2007) Ejects of inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on resident rhizosphere microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 276:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cawoy H, Debois D, Franzil L, De Pauw E, Thonart P, Ongena M (2015) Lipopeptides as main ingredients for inhibition of fungal phytopathogens by Bacillus subtilis/ amyloliquefaciens. Microb Biotechnol 8:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Bakker MG, Sugiyama A, Manter DK, Vivanco JM (2013) Root exudation of phytochemicals in Arabidopsis follows specific patterns that are developmentally programmed and correlate with soil microbial functions. PLoS One 8:e55731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, Borriss R (2009) More than anticipated production of antibiotics and other secondary metabolites by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 16:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choudhary DK, Johri BN (2009) Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants–with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR). Microbiol Res 164:493–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawwam GE, Elbeltagy A, Emara HM, Abbas IH, Hassan MM (2013) Beneficial effect of plant growth promoting bacteria isolated from the roots of potato plant. Ann Agric Sci 58:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Debeaujon I, Koornneef M (2000) Gibberellin requirement for Arabidopsis seed germination is determined both by test a characteristics and embryonic abscisic acid. Plant Physiol 122:415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demain AL (2006) From natural products discovery to commercialization: a success story. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33:486–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Desai S, Grover M, Amalraj ELD, Kumar GP, Ahmed SKMH (2011) Exploiting plant growth promoting Rhizomicroorganisms for enhanced crop productivity. In: Satyanarayana T et al (eds) Microorganisms in sustainable agriculture and biotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 227–241Google Scholar
  19. Figueiredo MVB, Bonifacio A, Rodrigues AC, de Araujo FF (2016) Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria: key mechanisms of action. In: Choudhary DK, Varma A (eds) Microbial-mediated induced systemic resistance in plants. Springer, Singapore, pp 23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res 169:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gomi K, Matsuoka M (2003) Gibberellin signalling pathway. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:489–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gutierrez-Manero FJ, Ramos-Solano B, Probanza A, Mehouachi J, Tadeo FR, Talon M (2001) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Islam MR, Jeong YT, Lee YS, Song CH (2012) Isolation and identification of antifungal compounds from Bacillus subtilis C9 inhibiting the growth of plant pathogenic fungi. Mycobiol 40:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Islam F, Yasmeen T, Ali Q et al (2014) Influence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as PGPR on oxidative stress tolerance in wheat under Zn stress. Ecotox Environ Safe 104:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohler J, Hernandez JA, Caravaca F, Roldan A (2009) Induction of antioxidant enzymes is involved in the greater effectiveness of a PGPR versus AM fungi with respect to increasing the tolerance of lettuce to severe salt stress. Environ Exp Bot 65:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar A, Maurya BR, Raghuwanshi R (2014) Isolation and characterization of PGPR and their effect on growth, yield and nutrient content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biocatalysis Agric Biotechnol 3:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lavakush YJ, Verma JP, Jaiswal DK et al (2014) Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa). Ecol Eng 62:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee H, Kim HY (2010) Lantibiotics, class I bacteriocins from the genus Bacillus. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:229–235Google Scholar
  30. Lee YJ, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Kim BC, Lee HS, Jeong H, Lee DW (2012) Draft genome sequence of Bacillus endophyticus 2102. J Bacteriol 194:5705–5706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahmood A, Turgay OC, Farooq M, Hayat R (2016) Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a review. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Makarewicz O, Dubrac S, Msadek T, Borriss R (2006) Dual role of the PhoP~P response regulator: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 phytase gene transcription is directed by positive and negative interaction with the phy C promoter. J Bacteriol 188:6953–6965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martinez-Viveros O, Jorquera MA, Crowley DE, Gajardo G, Mora ML (2010) Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10:293–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Masciarelli O, Llanes A, Luna V (2014) A new PGPR co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum enhances soybean nodulation. Microbiol Res 169:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mishra S, Singh A, Keswani C, Saxena A, Sarma BK, Singh HB (2015) Harnessing plant-microbe interactions for enhanced protection against phytopathogens. In: Arora NK (ed) Plant microbe Symbiosis–applied facets. Springer, New Delhi, pp 111–125Google Scholar
  37. Ortiz-Castro R, Díaz-Pérez C, Martínez-Trujillo M, del Río RE, Campos-García J, López-Bucio J (2011) Transkingdom signaling based on bacterial cyclodipeptides with auxin activity in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:7253–7258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patel HA, Patel RK, Khristi SM et al (2012) Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes from Lycopersicon esculentum plant and their plant growth promoting characteristics. Nepal J Biotechnol 2:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paulucci NS, Gallarato LA, Reguera YB et al (2015) Arachis hypogaea PGPR isolated from Argentine soil modifies its lipids components in response to temperature and salinity. Microbiol Res 173:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Richardson AE (2001) Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:897–906Google Scholar
  41. Riefler M, Novak O, Strnad M, Schmülling T (2006) Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor mutants reveal functions in shoot growth, leaf senescence, seed size, germination, root development, and Cytokinin metabolism. Plant Cell 18:40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rojas-Tapias D, Moreno-Galvan A, Pardo-Dıaz S et al (2012) Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Appl Soil Ecol 61:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy M, Wei HX, Pare PW, Kloepper JW (2003) Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:4927–4932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sansinenea E (2012) Bacillus thuringiensis: biotechnology. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sansinenea E, Ortiz A (2012) Zwittermicin A: a promising aminopolyol antibiotic from biocontrol bacteria. Curr Org Chem 16:978–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider K, Chen XH, Vater J, Franke P, Nicholson G, Borriss R, S€ussmuth RD (2007) Macrolactin is the polyketide biosynthesis product of the pks2 cluster of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J Nat Prod 70:1417–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaligram NS, Singhal RS (2010) Surfactin–a review on biosynthesis, fermentation, purification and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol 48:119–134Google Scholar
  48. Shukla KP, Sharma S, Singh NK, Singh V, Tiwari K, Singh S (2011) Nature and role of root exudates: efficacy in bioremediation. Afr J Biotechnol 10:9717–9724Google Scholar
  49. Silo-Suh LA, Stabb EV, Raffel SJ, Handelsman J (1998) Target range of zwittermicin a, an aminopolyol antibiotic from Bacillus cereus. Curr Microbiol 37:6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singh HB, Sarma BK, Keswani C (eds) (2016) Agriculturally important microorganisms: commercialization and regulatory requirements in Asia. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh HB, Sarma BK, Keswani C (eds) (2017) Advances in PGPR. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  52. Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R (2007) Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism plant signalling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:425–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tak HI, Ahmad F, Babalola OO (2013) Advances in the application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in phytoremediation of heavy metals. In: Whitacre DM (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. Springer, New York, pp 33–52Google Scholar
  54. Tendulkar SR, Saikuman YK, Patel V, Raghotama S, Munshi TK, Balaram P, Chattoo BB (2007) Isolation, purification and characterization of an antifungal molecule produced by Bacillus licheniformis BC98, and its effect on phytopathogen Magnaporthe grisea. J Appl Microbiol 103:2331–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tudzynski B (2005) Gibberellin biosynthesis in fungi: genes, enzymes, evolution, and impact on biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:597–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vacheron J, Desbrosses G, Bouffaud ML, Touraine B, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Muller D, Legendre L, Wisniewski-Dye F, Prigent-Combaret C (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front Plant Sci 4:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Loon LC, Glick BR (2004) Increased plant fitness by rhizobacteria. In: Sandermann H (ed) Molecular ecotoxicology of plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Boyce AN (2016) Role of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability-a review. Molecules 21:573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verma JP, Yadav J, Tiwari KN, Singh L, Singh V (2010) Impact of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria on crop production. Int J Agric Res 11:954–983Google Scholar
  60. Wulff EG, Mguni CM, Mansfeld-Giese K, Fels J, Lu¨beck M, Hockenhull J (2002) Biochemical and molecular characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis and B. pumilus isolates with distinct antagonistic potential against Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Plant Pathol 51:574–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Younesi O, Moradi A (2014) Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) on antioxidant enzyme activities in salt-stressed bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agriculture (Polnohospodarstvo) 60:10–21Google Scholar
  62. Yu GY, Sinclair JB, Hartman GL, Bertagnolli BL (2002) Production of iturin A by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens suppressing Rhizoctonia solani. Soil Biol Biochem 34:955–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Živković S, Stojanović S, Ivanović Ž, Gavrilović V, Popović T, Balaž J (2010) Screening of antagonistic activity of microorganisms against Colletotrichum acutatum and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Arch Biol Sci Belgrade 62:611–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Estibaliz Sansinenea
    • 1
  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias QuímicasBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de PueblaPueMexico

Personalised recommendations