Advertisement

Fertility Transition in the Districts of India, 1991–2011

  • Sanjay K. Mohanty
  • Sayantani Chatterjee
  • Emily Das
  • Suyash Mishra
  • Rajesh K. Chauhan
Chapter

Abstract

Fertility transition is of global significance, and in India, it is characterized by large subnational variations. Though a large number of studies have examined the role of proximate and distal determinants of fertility change at the state level, limited number of studies examine the association in the districts of India. The objective of this chapter is to examine the role of proximate and distal determinants on fertility reduction in the districts of India. Data on the estimated total fertility rate (TFR) for 1991, 2001 and 2011 and under-five mortality are taken from published sources, and two of the proximate determinants, namely, the use of modern method of contraception and proportion of girls aged 20–24 years marrying below age 18 are taken from the recently conducted National Family and Health Survey 4, 2015–2016. Two distal determinants, namely, female literacy, wealth index along with caste and religion are taken from the Census of India 2011. Descriptive statistics and ordinary least square regressions are used for the analyses.

Out of the 640 districts in 2011, 207 (32%) districts accounting for 38% of the population had below replacement level of fertility, and 207 (32%) districts accounting for 28% of the population had TFR in the range of 2.1–3, 183 (29%) districts accounting for 28% of the population had TFR were in the range of 3–4, and 43 (7%) districts accounting for 7% of the population had TFR in the range 4+. Results suggest limited convergence of fertility level across the districts of India. The use of modern method of contraception to the extent of 65% may ensure attainment of replacement level of fertility in the districts of India. While there is an emerging optimism towards attainment of the exact replacement level of fertility in most parts, there remain pockets where specific intervention is needed to promote the use of modern methods of contraception and adherence to minimum legal age at marriage for girls. Both the proximate determinants and distal determinants exert significant influence on fertility transition in the districts of India.

Keywords

Fertility Modern method of contraception District Proximate determinant Distal determinants India 

References

  1. Anderson, T., & Kohler, H. P. (2015). Low fertility, socioeconomic development, and gender equity. Population and Development Review, 41(3), 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arokiasamy, P. (2009). Fertility decline in India: Contributions by uneducated women using contraception. Economic and Political Weekly, 44, 55–64.Google Scholar
  3. Basu, A. M. (2002). Why does education lead to lower fertility? A critical review of some of the possibilities. World Development, 30(10), 1779–1790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhat, M. P. N. (2002). Returning a favour: Reciprocity between female education and fertility. World Development, 30(10), 1791–1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloom, D. E., & Canning, D. (2008). Global demographic change: Dimensions and economic significance. Population and Development Review, 34(1), 17–51.Google Scholar
  6. Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22, 639–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinker, G., & Amonker, R. (2013). Socioeconomic development and fertility trends among the states of India. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 33(3/4), 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, J. (2007). Theories of fertility decline and the evidence from development indicators. Population and Developmental Review, 33(1), 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casterline, J. B. (2001). The pace of fertility transition: National pattern in the second half of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review, 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition), 17–52.Google Scholar
  10. Cleland, J. (2001). The effect of improved survival on fertility: A reassessment. Population and Development Review, 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition), 60–92.Google Scholar
  11. Cleland, J., & Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view. Population Studies, 41(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dharmalingam, A., Rajan, S., & Morgan, S. P. (2014). The determinants of low fertility in India. Demography, 51(4), 1451–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorius, S. F. (2008). Global demographic convergence? A reconsideration of changing inter-country inequality in fertility. Population and Development Review, 34(3), 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drèze, J., & Murthi, M. (2001). Fertility, education, and development: evidence from India. Population and Development Review, 27(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 35–60.Google Scholar
  16. Ezeh, A. C., Bongaarts, J., & Mberu, B. (2012). Global population trends and policy options. The Lancet, 380(9837), 142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guilmoto, C. Z., & Rajan, S. I. (2001). Spatial patterns of fertility transition in Indian districts. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 713–738.Google Scholar
  18. Guilmoto, C. Z., & Rajan, S. I. (2002). District level estimates of fertility from India’s 2001 census. Economic and Political Weekly, 37, 665–672.Google Scholar
  19. Guilmoto, C. Z., & Rajan, S. I. (2013). Fertility at the district level in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(23), 59–70.Google Scholar
  20. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  21. Jain, A. K., & Nag, M. (1986). Importance of female primary education for fertility reduction in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 21, 1602–1608.Google Scholar
  22. Kumar, S., & Sathyanarayana, K. M. (2012). District-level estimates of fertility and implied sex ratio at birth in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(33), 66–72.Google Scholar
  23. Mohanty, S. K., & Rajbhar, M. (2014). Fertility transition and adverse child sex ratio in districts of India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 46(06), 753–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mohanty, S. K., & Ram, F. (2011). Spatial pattern of poverty reduction and fertility transition in India. Population Review, 50(1), 62–78.Google Scholar
  25. Mohanty, S. K., Fink, G., Chauhan, R., & Canning, D. (2016). Distal determinants of fertility decline: Evidence from 640 Indian districts. Demographic Research, 34, 373–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI). (1997). District level estimates of fertility and child mortality for 1991 and their interrelationship with other variables (Occasional paper of 1997). New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI).Google Scholar
  27. Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI). (2016). Sample registration system statistical report 2016. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General of India (ORGI).Google Scholar
  28. Potter, J. E., Schmertmann, C. P., & Cavenaghi, S. M. (2002). Fertility and development: Evidence from Brazil. Demography, 39(4), 739–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ram, U., Jha, P., Ram, F., Kumar, K., Awasthi, S., Shet, A., Pader, J., Nansukusa, S., & Kumar, R. (2013). Neonatal, 1–59 month, and under-5 mortality in 597 Indian districts, 2001 to 2012: estimates from national demographic and mortality surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 1(4), e219–e226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Singh, A., Kumar, K., Pathak, P. K., Chauhan, R. K., & Banerjee, A. (2017). Spatial patterns and determinants of fertility in India. Population, 72(3), 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanjay K. Mohanty
    • 1
  • Sayantani Chatterjee
    • 2
  • Emily Das
    • 3
  • Suyash Mishra
    • 2
  • Rajesh K. Chauhan
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Fertility StudiesInternational Institute for Population SciencesMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.International Institute for Population SciencesMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Population Services InternationalLucknowIndia
  4. 4.Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Planning DepartmentGovernment of Uttar PradeshLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations