Advertisement

Modelling the Construction Accident Cases via Structural Equation Modelling

  • Rita Yi Man LiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Construction accident compensation is one of the most critical factors that motivate contractors and clients to provide sufficient safety measures for workers. A court will usually collect information about the average monthly earnings of the workers before the accident to evaluate their working ability and consider the effects of injury on their productivity; this is to provide a fair judgment relating to the compensation items. Regarding the level of compensation, most compensation categories such as PSLA, pretrial loss of earning and future treatment are reflected in the level of compensation. The more severe the injury caused by accident, the more is the compensation for the future loss. Besides, even though there are few studies concerning the economic aspects of tort, there is a distinct lack of studies on the factors that affect the compensation. This chapter fills this academic void by utilising a structural equation modelling approach. Accident compensation court cases dated from 1982 to 2015 in Hong Kong were collected. 14 categories of information (including the level of injury as a ‘latent’ or unmeasurable variable) were recorded and used to construct the model which was then used for compensation estimation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of the paper was presented in European Real Estate Society Conference 2017.

References

  1. Angelini, M.E., and G.B.M. Heuvelink. 2018. Including spatial correlation in structural equation modelling of soil properties. Spatial Statistics 25: 35–51.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azhar, S. 2017. Role of visualization technologies in safety planning and management at construction jobsites. Procedia Engineering 171: 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bunting, J., C. Branche, C. Trahan, and L. Goldenhar. 2017. A national safety stand-down to reduce construction worker falls. Journal of Safety Research 60: 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Y., B. McCabe, and D. Hyatt. 2017. Impact of individual resilience and safety climate on safety performance and psychological stress of construction workers: A case study of the Ontario construction industry. Journal of Safety Research 61: 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., B. McCabe, and D. Hyatt. 2018. A resilience safety climate model predicting construction safety performance. Safety Science 109: 434–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evermann, J., and M. Tate. 2016. Assessing the predictive performance of structural equation model estimators. Journal of Business Research 69 (10): 4565–4582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fabrigar, L.R., R.D. Porter, and M.E. Norris. 2010. Some things you should know about structural equation modeling but never thought to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (2): 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glofcheski, R. 2012. Tort Law in Hong Kong, 3rd ed. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
  9. Guo, H., Y. Yu, and M. Skitmore. 2017. Visualization technology-based construction safety management: A review. Automation in Construction 73: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jöreskog, K.G. 1973. A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In Structural equation models in the social sciences, ed. A.S. Goldberger, O.D. Duncan, 85–112. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kaplan, D. 2001. Structural Equation Modeling A2—Smelser, Neil J. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, ed. P.B. Baltes, 15215–15222. Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, R.Y.M. 2015. Construction safety knowledge sharing via smart phone apps and technologies. In Handbook of mobile teaching and learning, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, R.Y.M., and S.W. Poon. 2009. Workers’ compensation for non-fatal accidents: Review of Hong Kong Court cases. Asian Social Science 5 (11): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, R.Y.M., and S.W. Poon. 2011. Using Web 2.0 to share knowledge of construction safety: the fable of economic animals. Economic Affairs 31 (1): 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, R. Y. M., W. Chau Kwong, and W. Ho Daniel Chi. 2017a. Dynamic panel analysis of construction accidents in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Law and Economics.Google Scholar
  16. Li, Q., C. Ji, J. Yuan, and R. Han. 2017b. Developing dimensions and key indicators for the safety climate within China’s construction teams: A questionnaire survey on construction sites in Nanjing. Safety Science 93: 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liao, C.-W., and T.-L. Chiang. 2015. The examination of workers’ compensation for occupational fatalities in the construction industry. Safety Science 72: 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, J., and C.-Z. Hu. 2017. Application of information technology in active safety control for construction machine. Procedia Engineering 174: 1182–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Misiurek, K., and B. Misiurek. 2017. Methodology of improving occupational safety in the construction industry on the basis of the TWI program. Safety Science 92: 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohammad, M.Z., and B.H.W. Hadikusumo. 2017. A Model of integrated multilevel safety intervention practices in Malaysian construction industry. Procedia Engineering 171: 396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagase, M., and Y. Kano. 2017. Identifiability of nonrecursive structural equation models. Statistics & Probability Letters 122: 109–117.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park, R.M., and A. Bhattacharya. 2013. Uncompensated consequences of workplace injuries and illness: Long-term disability and early termination. Journal of Safety Research 44: 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schreiber, J.B. 2008. Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 4 (2): 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Torres, L.D., and A. Jain. 2017. Employer’s civil liability for work-related accidents: A comparison of non-economic loss in Chile and England. Safety Science 94: 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsao, L., J. Chang, and L. Ma. 2017. Fatigue of Chinese railway employees and its influential factors: Structural equation modelling. Applied Ergonomics 62: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, J., and X. Wang. 2012. Latent growth models for longitudinal data analysis.Google Scholar
  27. Zhang, Y.-Q., G.-L. Tian, and N.-S. Tang. 2016. Latent variable selection in structural equation models. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 152: 190–205.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceHong Kong Shue Yan UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations