Advertisement

Dynamic Panel Study of Building Accidents

  • Rita Yi Man LiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the riskiest sectors of production; it suffers from numerous deaths and injuries every year. As large amounts of compensation are spent on construction accidents, it is necessary to review the factors which impact the amount of compensation in court. In academic terms, analysis of accident compensation has usually depended on studies provided by the labour department in the past, none of the previous researches in this area has utilised the dynamic panel technique to study the relationships involved. The court case reports recorded that most victims’ monthly salary fell below HK$20,000 and they aged between 30 and 49. The results show that non-Cantonese speakers receive less compensation than locals do and more extensive hearings are associated with a more significant amount of compensation. There was, however, no significant difference between victims who had and did not have a mental disorder.

Keywords

Construction accidents Court cases Discrimination Hong Kong System-GMM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter is a revised version of Li, Rita Yi Man, Chau, Kwong Wing, Ho, Daniel Chi Wing (2017) Dynamic Panel Analysis on Construction accidents in Hong Kong, Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 8(3), 1–14.

References

  1. Alanya, A., M. Swyngedouw, V. Vandezande, and K. Phalet. 2015, Fall. Close encounters: Minority and majority perceptions of discrimination and intergroup relations in Antwerp, Belgium. International Migration Review 1–25.Google Scholar
  2. Bun, M. J. G., and F. Windmeijer. 2009. The weak instrument problem of the system GMM estimator in dynamic panel data models. Econometrics Journal 12: 1–32.Google Scholar
  3. Feng, Y., and P. Wu. 2015. Risk compensation behaviours in construction workers’ activities. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 22: 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garve, K. 1935. Physical pain and mental suffering in workmen’s compensation cases. Detroit Law Review 5: 109–127.Google Scholar
  5. Guryan, J., and K.K. Charles. 2013. Taste-based or statistical discrimination: The economics of discrimination reutrns to its roots. The Economic Journal 123: F417–F432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Irumba, R. 2014. Spatial analysis of construction accidents in Kampala, Uganda. Safety Science 64: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Labour Department. 2016. Construction safety award scheme. http://www.labour.gov.hk/eng/news/leafletE_CISAS_1617.pdf.
  8. Leitão, N.C., and M. Shahbaz. 2013. Carbon dioxide emissions, urbanization and globalization: A dynamic panel data. The Economic Research Guardian 3: 22–32.Google Scholar
  9. Li, R.Y.M. 2013. The usage of automation system in smart home to provide a sustainable indoor environment: A content analysis in web 1.0. International Journal of Smart Home 7: 47–60.Google Scholar
  10. Li, R.Y.M. 2015a. Construction Safety and Waste Management: An Economic Analysis. Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, R.Y.M., and S.W. Poon. 2009a. Future motivation in construction safety knowledge sharing by means of information technology in Hong Kong. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences 4: 457–472.Google Scholar
  12. Li, R.Y.M., and S.W. Poon. 2009b. Workers’ compensation for non-fatal construction accidents: Review of Hong Kong court cases. Asian Social Science 5: 15–24.Google Scholar
  13. Li, R.Y.M., and Y.L. Li. 2013. The role of competition law: an Asian perspective. Asian Social Science 9: 47–53.Google Scholar
  14. Li, R.Y.M., and S.W. Poon. 2013. Construction safety. Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Li, R.Y.M., and H.Y. Tsoi. 2014. Latin America Sustainable Building Finance Knowledge Sharing. Latin American Journal of Management for Sustainable Development 1: 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, H., M. Lu, S.-C. Hsu, M. Gray, and T. Huang. 2015a. Proactive behavior-based safety management for construction safety improvement. Safety Science 75: 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, R. Y. M., A. Lee, A. Cheung, and H. Ma. 2015b. Unification of competition law in EU: Can that provide a useful example for Asian countries? In EUSAAP annual conference, Seoul.Google Scholar
  18. Li, R.Y.M., H.C.Y. Li, C.K. Mak, T. Tang, and Beiqi. 2016. Sustainable smart home and home automation: Big data analytics approach. International Journal of Smart Home 10: 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liao, C.W., and T.L. Chiang. 2015. The examination of workers’ compensation for occupational fatalities in the construction industry. Safety Science 72: 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mistikoglu, G., I.H. Gerek, E.P.E. Erdis, M. Usmen, H. Cakan, and E.E. Kazan. 2014. Decision tree analysis of construction fall accidents involving roofers. Expert Systems with Applications 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Occupational Safety and Health Branch Labour Department. 2016. Occupational safety and health statistics. Bulletinhttp://www.labour.gov.hk/eng/osh/pdf/Bulletin2015_EN.pdf.
  22. Panuwatwanich, K., S. Al-Haadir, and R.A. Stewart. 2017. Influence of safety motivation and climate on safety behaviour and outcomes: Evidence from the Saudi Arabian construction industry. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 23: 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Proehl, P.O. 1961. Anguish of mind damages for mental suffering under illinois law. Northwestern University Law Review 56: 477–501.Google Scholar
  24. Quinlan, M., S.J. Fitzpatrick, L.R. Matthews, M. Ngo, and P. Bohle. 2015. Administering the cost of death: Organisational perspectives on workers’ compensation and common law claims following traumatic death at work in Australia. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 38: 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rock, P.G., and P.C. Kitty. 2015. Twenty-first century environmental dispute resolution—Is there an ‘ECT’ in your future? Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 33: 10–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roomkin, M., and R.N. Block. 1981. Case processing time and the outcome of representation elections: Some empirical evidence. Univeristy of Illinois Law Review 1981: 75–98.Google Scholar
  27. Saracino, A., M. Curcuruto, G. Antonioni, M.G. Mariani, D. Guglielmi, and G. Spadoni. 2015. Proactivity-and-consequence-based safety incentive (PCBSI) developed with a fuzzy approach to reduce occupational accidents. Safety Science 79: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Secretary for Sustainable Development. 2015. WBTC No. 32/99 independent safety audit scheme for mega capital works contracts or capital works contracts involving unconventional construction method. http://www.devb.gov.hk/filemanager/technicalcirculars/en/upload/184/1/wb3299.pdf.
  29. Taleb, N.N., D.G. Goldstein, and M.W. Spitznagel. 2009. The six mistakes executives make in risk management. Harvard Business Review 1–4.Google Scholar
  30. Wong, L., Y. Wang, P.E.T. Law, and C.T. Lo. 2016. Association of root causes in fatal fall-from-height construction accidents in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yin, X., D. Levy, C. Willinger, A. Adouriand, and M.G. Larso. 2016. Multiple imputation and analysis forhigh-dimensional incomplete proteomics data. Statistics in Medicine 35: 1315–1326.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao, X., and M. Biernat. 2017. “Welcome to the U.S.” but “Change Your Name”? Adopting anglo names and discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceHong Kong Shue Yan UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations