Advertisement

Mechanisms of Safety Risk Consciousness as Reflected in Brain and Eye Activities: A Conceptual Study

  • Rita Yi Man LiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Colour perception problems can impair the ability to recognise various construction safety risks on sites, while the awareness of safety signage may be affected by semiotics. This chapter first provides a review of the causes of construction accidents; this is followed by a study on the implication of colour on safety risk awareness and the impact of semiotics for safety signage. It proposes the application of mouse tracking, eye tracking, EEG and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) for studying hazard identifications made by workers.

Keywords

Eye tracking Semiotics Construction safety Integrated information theory Construction hazard visualisation Electroencephalogram Functional near-infrared spectroscopy Augmented reality Mixed reality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter is an extended and revised version of the paper published Li, Rita Yi Man, Tat Ho Leung and Tommy Au (2018) Biometrics analysis on construction workers’ hazard awareness, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 365, pp. 1–7.

References

  1. Abney, D.H., D.M. McBride, A.M. Conte, and D.W. Vinson. 2015. Response dynamics in prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22 (4): 1020–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, E.E. 1976. Accident causation and the management system. Professional Safety 21 (10): 26–29.Google Scholar
  3. Alarcon, L.F., D. Acuna, S. Diethelm, and E. Pellicer. 2016. Strategies for improving safety performance in construction firms. Accident Analysis and Prevention 94: 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahn, S., and L. Barratt-Pugh. 2012a. Emerging issues of health and safety training delivery in Australia: Quality and Transferability. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahn, S., and L. Barratt-Pugh. 2012b. Evaluation of the mandatory construction induction training program in Western Australia: Unanticipated consequences. Evaluation and Program Planning 35: 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brahm, F., and M. Singer. 2013. Is more engaging safety training always better in reducing accidents? Evidence of self-selection from Chilean panel data. Journal of Safety Research 47: 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke, M.J., S.A. Sarpy, K. Smith-Crowe, S. Chan-Serafin, R.O. Salvador, and G. Islam. 2006. Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods. American Journal of Public Health 96 (2): 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke, M.J., R.O. Salvador, K. Smith-Crowe, S. Chan-Serafin, A. Smith, and S. Sonesh. 2011. The dread factor: How hazards and safety training influence learning and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (1): 46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Causse, M., Z. Chua, V. Peysakhovich, N. Del Campo, and N. Matton. 2017. Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Scientific Reports 7 (1): 5222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerullo, M.A. 2015. The problem with Phi: A critique of integrated information theory. PLoS Computational Biology 11 (9): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, J., R.Q. Wang, Z. Lin, and X. Guo. 2018. Measuring the cognitive loads of construction safety sign designs during selective and sustained attention. Safety Science 105: 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flin, R., K. Mearns, P. O’Connor, and R. Bryden. 2000. Measuring safety climate identifying the standard features. Safety Science 34: 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallimore, A.R. 2015. Restructuring consciousness: The psychedelic state in light of integrated information theory. Frontier in Human Neuroscience 9: 1–16.Google Scholar
  14. Garrett, J.W., and J. Teizer. 2009. Human factors analysis classification system relating to human error awareness taxonomy in construction safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 135 (8): 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geller, S.E. 2001. Behavioral-based safety in industry: Realizing the large-scale potential of psychology to promote human welfare. Applied and Preventive Psychology 10 (2): 87–105.Google Scholar
  16. Guo, B.H.W., T.W. Yiu, and V.A. Gonzalez. 2016. Predicting safety behavior in the construction industry: Development and test of an integrative model. Safety Science 84: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo, H., Y. Yu, and M. Skitmore. 2017. Visualization technology-based construction safety management: A review. Automation in Construction 73: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hacker, W. 2003. Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 12 (2): 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. He, Q., S. Dong, T. Rose, H. Li, Q. Yin, and D. Cao. 2016. Systematic impact of institutional pressures on safety climate in the construction industry. Accident Analysis and Prevention 93: 230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hehman, E., Stolier, R. M., and Freeman, J. B. 2014. Advanced mouse-tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 18 (3): 384–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jahani, S., A.L. Fantana, D. Harper, J.M. Ellison, D.A. Boas, B.P. Forester, and M.A. Yücel. 2017. fNIRS can robustly measure brain activity during memory encoding and retrieval in healthy subjects. Scientific Reports 7 (1): 9533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, M., B.H. Kim, and S. Jo. 2015. Quantitative Evaluation of a low-cost noninvasive hybrid interface based on EEG and eye movement. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 23 (2): 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, K., H. Kim, and H. Kim. 2017. Image-based construction hazard avoidance system using augmented reality in wearable device. Automation in Construction 83: 390–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laberge, M., E. MacEachen, and B. Calvet. 2014. Why are occupational health and safety training approaches not effective? Understanding young worker learning processes using an ergonomic lens. Safety Science 68: 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, R.Y.M. 2015a. Construction safety and waste management: An economic analysis. Switzerland Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Li, R.Y.M. 2015b. Construction safety knowledge sharing via smart phone apps and technologies. In Handbook of mobile teaching and learning, ed. Y. Zhang, 1–11. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  27. Li, R.Y.M. 2018. An economic analysis on automated construction safety: Internet of things, artificial intelligence and 3D printing. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Lupu, R.G., F. Ungureanu, and V. Siriteanu. 2013. Eye tracking mouse for human computer interaction. Paper read at E-Health and Bioengineering Conference, at Iasi, Romania.Google Scholar
  29. McJunkin, J.L., P. Jiramongkolchai, W. Chung, M. Southworth, N. Durakovic, C.A. Buchman, and J.R. Silva. 2018. Development of a mixed reality platform for lateral skull base anatomy. Otology & Neurotology 39 (10): e1137–e1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Microsoft. 2018. Mr and Azure 310: Object detection [cited 14 October 2018]. Available from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/mr-azure-310.
  31. Ng, A.W.Y., and A.H.S. Chan. 2015. Effects of user factors and sign referent characteristics in participatory construction safety sign redesign. Safety Science 74: 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oizumi, M., L. Albantakis, and G. Tononi. 2014. From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated information theory 3.0. PLoS Computational Biology 10 (5): e1003588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olander, J., E. Ronchi, R. Lovreglio, and D. Nilsson. 2017. Dissuasive exit signage for building fire evacuation. Applied Ergonomics 59: 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Omar, H., L. Mahdjoubi, and G. Kheder. 2018. Towards an automated photogrammetry-based approach for monitoring and controlling construction site activities. Computers in Industry 98: 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pouliakas, K., and L. Theodossiou. 2013. The economics of health and safety at work: An interdiciplinary review of the theory and policy. Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (1): 167–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Salas, E., and J.A. Cannon-Bowers. 2001. The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology 521 (1): 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shishkin, S.L., Y.O. Nuzhdin, E.P. Svirin, A.G. Trofimov, A.A. Fedorova, B.L. Kozyrskiy, and B.M. Velichkovsky. 2016. EEG negativity in fixations used for gaze-based control: Towards converting intentions into actions with an eye-brain-computer interface. Frontier in Neuroscience 10: 1–20.Google Scholar
  38. Tononi, G. 2004. An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience 5 (42): 1–22.Google Scholar
  39. Tononi, G. 2008. Consciousness as integrated information: A provisional manifesto. Biological Bulletin 215 (3): 216–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tononi, G. 2015. Integrated information theory. Scholarpedia 10 (1): 4164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tononi, G., and C. Koch. 2008. The neural correlates of consciousness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124 (1): 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tononi, G., M. Boly, M. Massimini, and C. Koch. 2016. Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 17: 450–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang, Z., L. Jia, and Y. Qin. 2017. Optimal number and location planning of evacuation signage in public space. Safety Science 91: 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceHong Kong Shue Yan UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations