Advertisement

Classification of Plants Using GIST and LBP Score Level Fusion

  • Pradip SalveEmail author
  • Milind Sardesai
  • P. Yannawar
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 968)

Abstract

Plant Leaf retains many characteristics that can be used to achieve automatic plant classification, Leaf also contains other traits like shape, size, color, texture but these are not enough to distinguish one plant species from another. Extraction of prominent leaf features involves enhancement and feature normalization. The leaf venation may explore as a promising feature due to its correlation similarity between intra-classes. Recently numerous plant classification systems have been proposed. Most of the plant recognition systems rely on single feature but automatic plant leaf classification system that uses single feature often faces several limitations in terms of accuracy. The limitations of system can be overcome by building multimodal plant classification systems that fabricates multiple features together using feature level fusion as well as score level fusion. This paper presents score level fusion of LBP (Local Binary Patterns) and GIST (Global descriptors) features towards building more robust automatic plant classification system. The results shows that, the score level fusion has contributed towards efficient plant classification with the 87.22% genuine accept rate (GAR) for GIST features, LBP features with 78.39% GAR and GIST + LBP scores 89.23% of GAR were observed.

Keywords

Leaf vein Plant recognition Multimodal plant classification 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Authors would like to acknowledge UGC-MANF fellowship for financial support and technical supports of GIS & Remote sensing Lab of Department of Computer Science & IT, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.

References

  1. 1.
    Dhondt, S., et al.: Quantitative analysis of venation patterns of Arabidopsis leaves by supervised image analysis. Plant J. 69(3), 553–563 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chai, D., Forstner, W., Lafarge, F.: Recovering line-networks in images by junction-point processes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1894–1901 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rankothge, W.H., Dissanayake, D.M.S.B., Gunathilaka, U.V.K.T., Gunarathna, S.A.C.M., Mudalige, C.M., Thilakumara, R.P.: Plant recognition system based on Neural Networks. In: 2013 International Conference on Advances in Technology and Engineering (ICATE), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rahmadhani, M., Herdiyeni, Y.: Shape and vein extraction on plant leaf images using Fourier and B-spline modeling. In: AFITA International Conference, The Quality Information for Competitive Agricultural Based Production System and Commerce, pp. 306–310 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun, Z., Lu, S., Guo, X., Tian, Y.: Leaf vein and contour extraction from point cloud data. In: 2011 International Conference on Virtual Reality and Visualization (ICVRV), pp. 11–16. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke, J., et al.: Venation pattern analysis of leaf images. In: Bebis, G., et al. (eds.) ISVC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4292, pp. 427–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11919629_44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ford, G.E., Estes, R.R., Chen, H.: Space scale analysis for image sampling and interpolation. In: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP-92, vol. 3, pp. 165–168. IEEE (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valliammal, N., Geethalakshmi, S.N.: Hybrid image segmentation algorithm for leaf recognition and characterization. In: 2011 International Conference on Process Automation, Control and Computing (PACC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salve, P., Sardesai, M., Manza, R., Yannawar, P.: Identification of the plants based on leaf shape descriptors. In: Satapathy, S.C., Raju, K.S., Mandal, J.K., Bhateja, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies. AISC, vol. 379, pp. 85–101. Springer, New Delhi (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2517-1_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deng, W., Huang, Y., Zhao, C., Chen, L., Wang, X.: Bayesian discriminant analysis of plant leaf hyperspectral reflectance for identification of weeds from cabbages. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 11, 551–562 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anjomshoae, S.T., Rahim, M.S.M.: Enhancement of template-based method for overlapping rubber tree leaf identification. Comput. Electron. Agric. 122, 176–184 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Souzaa, M.M.S., Medeiros, F.N.S., Ramalho, G.L.B., de Paula Jr, I.C., Oliveira, I.N.S.: Evolutionary optimization of a multiscale descriptor for leaf shape analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 63, 375–385 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. Prog. Brain Res. 155, 23–36 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ojala, T., Pietikäinen, M., Harwood, D.: A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on feature distributions. Pattern Recognit. 29(1), 51–59 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ali, M.M.H., Yannawar, P.L., Gaikwad, A.T.: Multi-algorithm of palmprint recognition system based on fusion of local binary pattern and two-dimensional locality preserving projection. Procedia Comput. Sci. 115, 482–492 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vision and Intelligence Lab, Department of Computer Science and ITDr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada UniversityAurangabadIndia
  2. 2.Floristic Research Lab, Department of BotanySavitribai Phule Pune UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations