Advertisement

“Call That Art? I Call It Bad Eyesight”: Seeing or Not Seeing in the Context of Responsive Art Practice

  • Annie LovejoyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In response to the idea that static representation might “capture” or “halt” the eventfulness of life, Lovejoy invites the reader to consider move-ability in the doings of images and texts. Here reductive re-presentation is refused calling on our sense-abilities to see—that is perceive things in their real contexts. A focus on context is a focus on what happens rather than on a thing that is in the world. Loitering with intent in a series of vignettes she invites you to “vade mecum … go with me” as she revisits past projects in an attempt to re-present experiential complexities of practice through narrative c/artographies.

References

  1. Carter, P. (2007). Interest: The ethics of invention. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry. London, UK: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  2. Gablik, S. (1991). The re-enchantment of art. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  3. Griffiths, J. (2008). Wild: An elemental journey. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Guest, A. (2009). Artists and places—The time for a new relationship and a new agenda. Retrieved from http://archive.publicartscotland.com/features/11-ARTISTS-AND-PLACES-the-time-for-a-new-relationship-and-a-new-agenda.
  5. Hattenstone, S. (1998, April 29). Love letters to my dead child. The Guardian, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  6. Hawkins, H. (2015). Creative geographic methods: Knowing, representing intervening. Cultural Gaeographies, 22, 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152–174.Google Scholar
  8. Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethos, 71, 9–20.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, S. (2010). The glass box and the commonplace book. Transcript of the Hearst New Media lecture at Columbia University. Retrieved from http://www.stevenberlinjohnson.com/2010/04/the-glass-box-and-the-commonplace-book.html.
  11. Kaprow, A. (1993). Essays on the blurring of art and life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Katz, S. (2003). Wild fermentation: The flavor, nutrition, and craft of live-culture foods. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  13. Kember, S. (2013). Ambient intelligent photography. In M. Lister (Ed.), The photographic image in digital culture. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Koh, J. (2010). Artist’s research text on methodology. Helsinki, UK: The Finnish Academy of Fine Arts. Retrieved from http://www.ifima.net/ifima/personal/jaybio.htm.
  15. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Lippard, L. (1997). The Lure of the local: Senses of place in a multicultural society. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lippard, L. (1999). On the beaten track; Tourism, art and place. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lister, M. (1998). Catalogue essay. Afterimages: A re-presentation of selected works by Annie Lovejoy 1993–1998. Bristol, UK: InSites Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Murdin, A. (2010). Common places: An artist’s brief. In Wide Open Space: Developing creative places in dorset. Bristol, UK: Willis and Newson.Google Scholar
  21. O’Donohue, J. (1999). Anam Cara: Spiritual wisdom from the Celtic world. London, UK: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  22. Raven, A. (1995). A word of honour: The critics voice. In S. Lacy (Ed.), Mapping the terrain: New genre public art. Seattle, WA: Bay Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rubinstein, D., & Sluis, K. (2013). The digital image in photographic culture: Algorithmic photography and the crisis of representation. In M. Lister (Ed.), The photographic image in digital culture. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Sontag, S. (1994). Against interpretation. London, UK: Vintage.Google Scholar
  25. Stiles, K., & Selz, P. (1996). Theories and documents of contemporary art: A sourcebook of artists’ writings. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tolia-Kelly, D. (2011). The geographies of cultural geography II: Visual culture. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wachtel, E. (1993). The first picture show: Cinematic aspects of cave art. Leonardo, 26, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FalmouthUK

Personalised recommendations