Geologic Landscape: A Performance and a Wrecked Mobile Phone

  • Veronica VickeryEmail author


This chapter brings a geologically focussed inflection to landscape studies. Using a non-representational approach to practice, informed by geo-aesthetics and feminist materialisms, Vickery reflects on a performance in a stream—the site of flash-flood in Cornwall (UK). This reflection neither precludes thinking landscape in terms of the political consequences of visual representation, nor as performed, subjective process. Using the disruption of performance by the accidental demise of her mobile phone, she speculates that landscape is additionally marked by ephemeral material process and agential geologic process, human and of the Earth. As a result, she suggests there is a need for artists to attend to the political landscape via the intimacies of mundane, everyday narratives to understand material and geologic landscape encounters.


  1. Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2007). Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory, 32, 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2013). From nature to matter. In C. Archer, L. Ephraim, & L. Maxwell (Eds.), Second nature: Rethinking the natural through politics. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bosworth, K. (2016). Thinking permeable matter through feminist geophilosophy: Environmental knowledge controversy and the materiality of hydrogeologic processes. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space.
  6. Bristow, C. M. (1996). Cornwall’s geology and scenery: An introduction. Cornwall, UK: Cornish Hillside Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Cardiff, J., & Miller, G. B. (2018). Cardiff Miller Studio. Retrieved from
  8. Castree, N. (2012). The return of nature? Cultural Geographies, 19, 547–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, N. (2010). Volatile worlds, vulnerable bodies: Confronting abrupt climate change. Theory, Culture and Society, 27, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. J. (2015). Stone: An ecology of the inhuman. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornish Lithium Ltd. (2018). A new metal from an old mining area: Cornish lithium—The metal of the future. Retrieved from
  12. Cornwall Council. (2018). Cornwall minerals safeguarding plan. Retrieved from
  13. Cornwall in Focus. (2018). Retrieved from
  14. Cresswell, T. (2003). Landscape and the obliteration of practice. In K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 269–281). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dear, M., Ketchum, J., Luria, S., & Richardson, D. (2011). GeoHumanities: Art, history, text at the edge of place. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desjardins, J. (2016). The extraordinary raw materials in an iPhone 6s. Retrieved from
  17. Edmonds, M. (2006). Who said romance was dead? Journal of Material Culture, 11, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frears, L., Myers, M., & Geelhoed, E. (2017). Exploring deeper connection to landscape using a locative media deep map app: A Cornish case study. In J. Riding & M. Jones (Eds.), Reanimating regions: Culture, politics, and performance (pp. 263–286). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gabrys, J. (2011). Digital rubbish. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gallagher, M., & Prior, J. (2014). Sonic geographies: Exploring phonographic methods. Progress in Human Geography, 38, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawkins, H. (2013a). For creative geographies: Geography, visual arts and the making of worlds. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hawkins, H. (2013b). Geography and art: An expanding field—Site, the body and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 37, 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirsch, S. (2015). Cultural geography III: Objects of culture and humanity, or, re-‘thinging’ the Anthropocene landscape. Progress in Human Geography, 39, 818–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Le Frenais, R. (Convenor). (2017, October 30). Proving ground—Earth lab: An investigation of Earth as a laboratory [symposium]. University of Westminster.Google Scholar
  25. Lewis, B. (2018, March 27). Britain looks to ancient mines for electric future. Business News. Retrieved from
  26. Lorimer, H. (2006). Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lorimer, H. (2008). Cultural geography: Non-representational conditions and concerns. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Macpherson, H. (2010). Non-representational approaches to body–landscape relations. Geography Compass, 4, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Merriman, P., Revill, G., Cresswell, T., Lorimer, H., Matless, D., Rose, G., & Wylie, J. (2008). Landscape, mobility, practice. Social & Cultural Geography, 9, 191–212.Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell, W. J. T. (2002). Landscape and power. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Myers, M. (2011). Walking again lively: Towards an ambulant and conversive methodology of performance and research. Mobilities, 6, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nash, C. (1996). Reclaiming vision: Looking at landscape and the body. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 3, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson, R. (2006). Practice-as-research and the problem of knowledge. Performance Research, 11, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olwig, K. (2005). Representation and alienation in the political land-scape. Cultural Geographies, 12, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olwig, K. (2013). Heidegger, Latour and the reification of things: The inversion and spatial enclosure of the substantive landscape of things—The Lake District case. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95, 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose, G. (1993). Feminism & geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  39. Rose, G. (2016). Rethinking the geographies of cultural ‘objects’ through digital technologies Interface, network and friction. Progress in Human Geography, 40, 334–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rose, M. (2010a). Back to back: A response to landscape, absence and the geographies of love. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rose, M. (2010b). Envisaging the future: Ontology, time and the politics of non-representation. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking place: Non-representational theories and geography. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Rose, M., & Wylie, J. (2006). Animating landscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 475–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheller, M. (2015). Vital methodologies: Live methods, mobile art, and research-creation. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies (pp. 130–145). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Solnit, R. (2013). The faraway nearby. London, UK: Granta Books.Google Scholar
  45. Till, K. E. (2004). Political landscapes. In J. Duncan, N. C. Johnson, & R. H. Schein (Eds.), A companion to cultural geography (pp. 347–364). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vickery, V. (2015a). Beyond painting, beyond landscape: Working beyond the frame to unsettle representations of landscape. GeoHumanities, 1, 321–344.Google Scholar
  47. Vickery, V. (Artist). (2015b). Ophelia [Performance to camera]. Retrieved from
  48. Waterton, E. (2012). Landscape and non-representational theories. In P. Howard, I. Thompson, & E. Waterton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 66–75). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Waterton, E., & Atha, M. (2008). Introduction: Recovering landscape as a cultural practice. Landscape Research, 33, 509–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams, N. (2016). Creative processes: From interventions in art to intervallic experiments through Bergson. Environment and Planning A, 48, 1549–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wylie, J. (2005). A single day’s walking: Narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 234–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wylie, J. (2006). Depths and folds: On landscape and the gazing subject. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wylie, J. (2007). Landscape. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Wylie, J. (2009). Landscape, absence and the geographies of love. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wylie, J. (2012). Dwelling and displacement: Tim Robinson and the questions of landscape. Cultural Geographies, 19, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wylie, J. (2017). The distant: Thinking toward renewed senses of landscape and distance. Environment, Space, Place, 9, 1–20.Google Scholar
  57. Yusoff, K. (2013). Geologic life: Prehistory, climate, futures in the Anthropocene. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31, 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ExeterCornwallUK

Personalised recommendations