Advertisement

Audio Recording as Performance

  • Michael GallagherEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Audio recording is conventionally understood either as reproducing sounds or as representing them. This chapter begins by outlining these two conceptual filters, and then elaborates a third way of hearing audio recording: as performance. Bringing together elements of non-representational theory and materialist media theory, Gallagher draws attention to the physical processes of audio rather than its communicative and discursive functions, and discusses the implications for truth claims and the politics of sonic knowledge. Gallagher then examines how styles of audio production used in sound art can be used to amplify the performativity of audio.

References

  1. Altman, R. (1992). Introduction: Four and a half film fallacies. In R. Altman (Ed.), Sound theory/sound practice (pp. 35–45). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Arup. (n.d.). HS2 SoundLab demonstrations, simulating the sound of trains along the proposed HS2 route. Retrieved 20 September 2018 from https://www.arup.com/projects/hs2-soundlab-demonstrations.
  3. Bartlett, B., & Bartlett, J. (2017). Practical recording techniques: The step-by-step approach to professional audio recording. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Burgemeister, K. (2013). Wind farms: Hearing is believing. Retrieved from http://thoughts.arup.com/post/details/313/wind-farms-hearing-is-believing.
  5. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cardiff, J. (2005). The walk book. Vienna, Austria: Thyssen-Bornemisza Art Contemporary.Google Scholar
  7. Chion, M. (1994). Audio-vision: Sound on screen. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, C. (2009). Sound art and the sonic unconscious. Organised Sound, 14, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dewsbury, J.-D. (2003). Witnessing space: ‘Knowledge without contemplation’. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1907–1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drever, J. L. (2002). Soundscape composition: The convergence of ethnography and acousmatic music. Organised Sound, 7(1), 21–27.Google Scholar
  12. Durkin, A. (2014). Decomposition: A music manifesto. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  13. Feld, S., & Brenneis, D. (2004). Doing anthropology in sound. American Ethnologist, 31, 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallagher, M. (2014). Sounding ruins: Reflections on the production of an ‘audio drift’. Cultural Geographies.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014542745.
  15. Geier, M., Ahrens, J., & Spors, S. (2010). Object-based audio reproduction and the audio scene description format. Organised Sound, 15, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Koutsomichalis, M. (2013). On soundscapes, phonograpy, and environmental sound art. Journal of Sonic Studies, 4.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771816000315.
  18. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. MacLure, M., Holmes, R., Jones, L., & MacRae, C. (2010). Silence as resistance to analysis: Or, on not opening one’s mouth properly. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Makagon, D., & Neumann, M. (2009). Recording culture: Audio documentary and the ethnographic experience. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pedersen, E., van den Berg, F., Bakker, R., & Bouma, J. (2009). Response to noise from modern wind farms in the Netherlands. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 634–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pinder, D. (2001). Ghostly footsteps: Voices, memories and walks in the city. Ecumene, 8, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rendell, J. (2006). Art and architecture: A place between. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  24. Rennie, T. (2014). Socio-sonic: An ethnographic methodology for electroacoustic composition. Organised Sound, 19, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sterne, J. (2012). MP3: The meaning of a format. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thrift, N. J. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Underriner, C. F. (2017). The sound-poetry of the instability of reality: The audio reality effect and mimesis. Organised Sound, 22, 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vallee, M. (2014). Glenn Gould’s The Idea of North: The cultural politics of benevolent domination. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 32, 21–41.Google Scholar
  29. van den Berg, F. (2009). Wind turbines: Why they are noisy and what to do about it. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 2623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vogelin, S. (2010). Listening to noise and silence: Toward a philosophy of sound art. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  31. Wynne, J. (2010). Hearing faces, seeing voices: Sound art, experimentalism and the ethnographic gaze. In C. Wright & A. Schneider (Eds.), Between art and anthropology: Contemporary ethnographic practice (pp. 49–67). London, UK: Berg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Childhood, Youth and Education StudiesManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations