Thresholds of Representation: Physical Disability in Dance and Perceptions of the Moving Body
Non-representational theory opens up ways to make sense of non-cognitive, bodily, emotional, and affective processes in corporeal movement. Many theories of dance have focused on the continuity of movement, the process of passing seamlessly from one position to another. However, such expectations are readily disrupted by impaired bodies, which, despite their own internal continuity, are read through a normative body. This leads to registering movement in terms of an absence or lack of an expected movement. This prompts the viewer to shift from a direct consideration of the body–space relationship as a field of expression to representational structures that seek to explain the impairment. While this chapter approaches dance through non-representational theory, the authors argue that representation still shapes the conditions for affectual relationships in performance.
- Barbour, K., & Hitchmouth, A. (2014). Experiencing affect through site-specific dance. Emotion, Space and Society, 12, 63–72.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, A. (1998). Cabbages and kings: Disability, dance and some timely considerations. In A. Carter & J. O’Shea (Eds.), The Routledge dance studies reader (pp. 111–121). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Boon, M. (2016, February 11). Claire Cunningham: Conversations with crutches. Limelight. Retrieved 6 February 2018 from http://www.limelightmagazine.com.au/features/claire-cunningham-conversations-with-crutches/.
- Brown, C. (1998). Making spaces, speaking spaces. In A. Carter & J. O’Shea (Eds.), The Routledge dance studies reader (pp. 58–72). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- CanDoCo Dance Company. Retrieved from http://www.candoco.co.uk/the-work/candoco/12.
- Caputo, J. (2007). The weakness of god. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Casey, E. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, C. (n.d.). About Claire Cunninham. Retrieved 3 March 2018 from http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2011/10/reference-twins.html.
- Dewsbury, J.-D. (2010). Dancing: The secret slowness of the fast. In T. Cresswell & P. Merriman (Eds.), Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects (pp. 51–67). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Duffy, M., & Atkinson, P. (2014). Unnatural movements: Modernism’s shaping of intimate relations in Stravinsky’s Le sacre du printemps. Affirmations of the Modern, 2.Google Scholar
- Foster, S. L. (1995). Choreographing history. In S. L. Foster (Ed.), Choreographing history (pp. 3–21). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Foster, S. L. (Ed.). (1996). Corporealities: Dancing knowledge, culture and power. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Franko, M. (1996). Five theses on laughter after all. In G. Morris (Ed.), Moving words: Re-writing dance (pp. 43–62). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kuppers, P. (2003). Disability and contemporary performance: Bodies on the edge. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form: A theory of art developed from philosophy in a new key. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
- Langer, S. K. (1957). Problems of art: Ten philosophical lectures. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
- Laurie, V. (2016, January 25). Claire Cunningham: Battling the body fascists. The Australian. Retrieved 6 February 2018 from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/stage/claire-cunningham-battling-the-body-fascists/news-story/0c82dfc89ac43dd134c746ada6bed0de.
- Malloch, S. (2005). Why do we like to dance and sing? In R. Grove, C. Stevens, & S. McKechnie (Eds.), Thinking in four dimensions (pp. 14–28). Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
- Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrentarts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Murphy, A. (2016, September 30). Review: Curtis and Cunningham at CounterPulse. The Mercury News. Retrieved 4 March 2018 from http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/09/30/review-curtis-and-cunningham-at-counterpulse/.
- Sandahl, C., & Auslander, P. (Eds.). (2005b). Bodies in commotion: Disability and performance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Sheets, M. (1970). Phenomenology: An approach to dance. In M. Nadel & C. Nadel (Eds.), The dance experience: Readings in dance appreciation (pp. 33–48). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1981). Thinking in movement. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 39, 399–407.Google Scholar
- Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The primacy of movement. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Sparshott, F. (2004). The philosophy of dance: Bodies in motion, bodies at rest. In P. Kivy (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to aesthetics (pp. 276–290). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Van Camp, J. (2009). Dance. In S. Davies, K. M. Higgins, R. Hopkins, R. Stecker, & D. E. Cooper (Eds.), A companion to aesthetics (2nd ed., pp. 76–78). Malden, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar