Material Conditions in the Post-Human City

  • Andrew Gorman-MurrayEmail author


This chapter articulates Gorman-Murray’s ‘art-geography’ practice, with specific reference to one of his artworks, Material Conditions in the Post-Human City (2015). Art-geography describes this practice, which is situated at the intersection of contemporary art and cultural geography, drawing together conceptual and methodological approaches from both fields. Here he focuses on the conceptual and methodological processes behind Material Conditions in the Post-Human City, which sought to explore the vital materiality of both the world and the photograph together, notably processes of (urban) decay and (image) degradation. He discusses, in turn, the project’s geographical and art-historical catalysts; the terms and concepts that located and guided his art-geography practice; and contemporary art precedents that informed his methodological experimentation. The chapter culminates with documentation of the installed, resolved artwork.


  1. Abrams, D. (1997). Spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. London, UK: Vintage.Google Scholar
  2. Adey, P. (2006). If mobility is everything then it is nothing: Towards a relational politics of (im)mobilities. Mobilities, 1, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aloi, G. (2011). Art and animals. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, B., & Wylie, J. (2009). On geography and materiality. Environment and Planning A, 41, 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apel, D. (2015). Beautiful terrible ruins: Detroit and the anxiety of decline. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ash, J. (2015). Technology and affect: Towards a theory of inorganically organised objects. Emotion, Space and Society, 14, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, S. (2013). Artist/animal. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bicknell, J. (2014). Architectural ghosts. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 72, 435–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castree, N., & Nash, C. (2006). Posthuman geographies. Social and Cultural Geography, 7, 501–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cresswell, T., & Merriman, P. (2011). Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  13. Dalea, K., & Burrell, G. (2011). Disturbing structure: Reading the ruins. Culture and Organization, 17, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Bolla, P. (2002). Toward the materiality of aesthetic experience. Diacritics, 32, 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dillon, B. (Ed.). (2011). Ruins. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dillon, B. (2014). Ruin lust. London, UK: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Edensor, T. (2005). Industrial ruins: Aesthetics, materiality and memory. Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
  18. Edwards, E., & Hart, J. (2004). Photographs objects histories: On the materiality of images. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorman-Murray, A. (2014a). The ibis and us: Ecologies of belonging. Virtual exhibition (permanent). Retrieved from
  20. Gorman-Murray, A. (2014b, November 15–30). Over the ditch (with C. Brickell & A. de Jong). In On Islands creative collaboration festival. Terrey Hills, NSW: Eramboo Artist Environment. Catalogue by Selena Griffith. ISBN: 9781634430210.Google Scholar
  21. Gorman-Murray, A. (2015, June 17–20). Material conditions in the post-human city [photographic work; Inkjet print on rice paper, 3100 mm × 4000 mm]. Thresholds (Group Exhibition). Sydney, Australia: Ivan Dougherty Gallery.Google Scholar
  22. Gorman-Murray, A. (2016). Thrown-togetherness, 2015: Exegesis. In L. Crabtree, N. Cook, & A. Davison (Eds.), Housing and home unbound: Intersections in economics, environment and politics in Australia (pp. 18–21, 94–97, 168–171, 232–235). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Gorman-Murray, A. (2018a). Thrown-togetherness: Queering the interior in visual perspectives. In A. Gorman-Murray & M. Cook (Eds.), Queering the interior (pp. 15–25). London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  24. Gorman-Murray, A. (2018b). Afterword: An artist-geographer’s lens. In M. Zebracki & J. Palmer (Eds.), Public art encounters: Art, space and identity (pp. 219–223). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Gorman-Murray, A., & Brickell, C. (2017). Over the ditch: Queer mobilities at the nexus of art, geography and history. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(3), 576–604. Retrieved from
  26. Hansen, M. (1999). Out of time: Ruins as places of remembering in Italian painting ca. 1500. In W. Reinink & J. Stumpel (Eds.), Memory and Oblivion: Proceedings of the XXIXth international congress of the history of art held in Amsterdam, 1–7 September 1996 (pp. 795–802). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. London, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Hawkins, H. (2013). Geography and art, an expanding field: Site, the body and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 37, 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Head, L., Atchison, J., & Gates, L. (2012). Ingrained: A human bio-geography of wheat. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Hell, J., & Schönle, A. (2010). Ruins of modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ho, L. (2013). The non-affirmative: Jason Wee, photography, scopophobia. In C. Toh & C. Wong (Eds.), Reflect/refract: Essays on photography in Singapore (pp. 87–105). Singapore: Objectifs.Google Scholar
  32. Judkins, J. (2014). On things that are not there anymore. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 72, 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kac, E. (Ed.). (2009). Signs of life: Bio art and beyond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Leonardo Books.Google Scholar
  34. Korsmeyer, C. (2014). The triumph of time: Romanticism redux. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 72, 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kwon, M. (2004). One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lütticken, S. (2009). Viewing copies: On the mobility of moving images. E-Flux Journal, 8. Retrieved from
  38. Macaulay, R. (1953). Pleasure of ruins. New York, NY: Walker and Company.Google Scholar
  39. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, D. (2002). Accommodating. In C. Painter (Ed.), Contemporary art and the home (pp. 115–130). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, D. (2005). Materiality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  43. Perry, G. (2013). Playing at home: The house in contemporary art. London, UK: Reaktion.Google Scholar
  44. Rose, G. (2010). Doing family photography: The domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  45. Ross, C. (2012). The past is the present; It’s the future too: The temporal turn in contemporary art. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  46. Scarbrough, E. (2014). Unimagined beauty. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 72, 445–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sciampacone, A. (2011). Urban ruin: James Baillie Fraser’s representation of the Black Hole Memorial of Calcutta. Third Text, 25, 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shore, R. (2014). Post-photography: The artist with a camera. London, UK: Laurence King.Google Scholar
  49. Steyerl, H. (2009). In defense of the poor image. E-Flux Journal, 10. Retrieved from
  50. Tormey, J. (2013). Cities and photography. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Wolfe, C. (2010). What is post-humanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  53. Woodward, R. (2013, February 2). Disaster photography: When is documentary exploitation? ArtNews. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations