Advertisement

Application of Electrolyzed Water on Aquatic Product

  • Yong ZhaoEmail author
  • Zhaohuan Zhang
  • Pradeep K. Malakar
  • Siqi Wang
  • Li Zhao
Chapter

Abstract

The aquaculture industry has witnessed a continuous rapid growth over the last two decades from a combination of increased seafood consumption and production. These aquatic products filled a niche in the modern demand for alternate sources of protein. Electrolyzed water (EW), a novel non-thermal technique, is currently being used as an environmental-friendly sanitizer, and frozen electrolyzed water ice (EW ice) has emerged as an alternative method for improving the safety and quality of seafood. EW and EW ice whilst reducing microbial contamination also contribute to extending the shelf life of aquatic products compared to conventional sanitizers. This present chapter provides a comprehensive guide to the application of EW and EW ice on aquatic products and offers clear perspectives for a global adoption of EW in the seafood industry.

Keywords

Electrolyzed water (EW) Electrolyzed water ice (EW ice) Aquatic product inactivation Preservation 

References

  1. Al-Holy MA, Rasco BA (2015) The bactericidal activity of acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water against Escherichia coli, O157: H7, Salmonella, Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes, on raw fish, chicken and beef surfaces. Food Control 54:317–321Google Scholar
  2. Al-Qadiri HM, Al-Holy MA, Shiroodi SG et al (2016) Effect of acidic electrolyzed water-induced bacterial inhibition and injury in live clam (venerupis philippinarum) and mussel (mytilus edulis). Int J Food Microbiol 231:48–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Athayde DR, Flores D, Da JS et al (2017) Application of electrolyzed water for improving pork meat quality. Food Res Int 100:757–763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayebah B, Hung YC, Frank JF (2005) Enhancing the bactericidal effect of electrolyzed water on Listeria monocytogenes biofilms formed on stainless steel. J Food Prot 68:1375–1380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassin JP, Kleerebezem R, Rosado AS et al (2012) Effect of different operational conditions on biofilm development, nitrification, and nitrifying microbial population in moving-bed biofilm reactors. Environ Sci Technol 46(3):1546–1555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bridier A, Sanchez-Vizuete P, Guilbaud M et al (2015) Biofilm-associated persistence of food-borne pathogens. Food Microbio 45:167–178Google Scholar
  7. Carpentier B, Cerf O (1993) Biofilms and their consequences, with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry. J Appl Microbiol 75(6):499–511Google Scholar
  8. Chaillou S, Chaulot-Talmon A, Caekebeke H et al (2015) Origin and ecological selection of core and food-specific bacterial communities associated with meat and seafood spoilage. ISME J 9(5):1105–1118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen J, Xu B, Deng S et al (2016) Effect of combined pretreatment with slightly acidic electrolyzed water and botanic biopreservative on quality and shelf life of Bombay duck (harpadon nehereus). J Food Qual 39(2):116–125Google Scholar
  10. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG et al (1987) Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Ann Rev Microbiol 41(1):435–464Google Scholar
  11. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284(5418):1318–1322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalgaard P, Gram L, Huss HH (1993) Spoilage and shelf-life of cod fillets packed in vacuum or modified atmospheres. Int J Food Microbiol 19(4):283–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Delbarre-ladrat C, Chéret R, Taylor R et al (2006) Trends in postmortem aging in fish: understanding of proteolysis and disorganization of the myofibrillar structure. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 46(5):409–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Du SP, Zhang ZH, Xiao LL et al (2016) Acidic electrolyzed water as a novel transmitting medium for high hydrostatic pressure reduction of bacterial loads on shelled fresh shrimp. Front Microbiol 7:305PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dugo G, Mondello L, Costa R et al (2017) Potential use of proteomics in shellfish aquaculture: from assessment of environmental toxicity to evaluation of seafood quality and safety. Curr Org Chem 21(5):402–425Google Scholar
  16. Emborg J, Laursen BG, Rathjen T et al (2002) Microbial spoilage and formation of biogenic amines in fresh and thawed modified atmosphere-packed salmon (salmo salar) at 2 °C. J Appl Microbiol 92(4):790–799PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan W, Run-Ze FU, Shen J et al (2015) Changes of Patinopecten yessoensis microbial ecology and nutrition components during the process of depuration. Sci Technol Food Ind 36(19):78–83Google Scholar
  18. FAOSTAT (2016) World fisheries and aquaculture status in 2016: contributing to the full realization of food and nutritional safety, Rome, 200Google Scholar
  19. Feliciano L, Lee J, Lopes JA et al (2010) Efficacy of sanitized ice in reducing bacterial load on fish fillet and in the water collected from the melted ice. J Food Sci 75(4):M231–M238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisheries Bureau of the Ministry of Agriculture (2002) China Fisheries Yearbook. China Agriculture PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Flemming HC, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8(9):623–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghaly AE, Dave D, Budge S et al (2010) Fish spoilage mechanisms and preservation techniques: review. Am J Appl Sci 7(7):859–877Google Scholar
  23. Gram L, Dalgaard P (2002) Fish spoilage bacteria–problems and solutions. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13(3):262–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gram L, Huss HH (2000) Fresh and processed fish and shellfishGoogle Scholar
  25. Han Q, Song XY, Zhang ZH et al (2017) Removal of foodborne pathogen biofilms by acidic electrolyzed water. Front Microbiol 8:988PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2004) Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2(2):95–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hao J, Wu T, Li H et al (2016) Differences of bactericidal efficacy on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis, of slightly and strongly acidic electrolyzed water. Food Bioprocess Technol 10:1–10Google Scholar
  28. Hoiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M et al (2010) Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int J Antimicrob AG 35:322e332Google Scholar
  29. Huang YR, Hung YC, Hsu SY et al (2008) Application of electrolyzed water in the food industry. Food Control 19:329–345Google Scholar
  30. Kasai H, Kawana K, Labaiden M et al (2011) Elimination of Escherichia coli from oysters using electrolyzed seawater. Aquaculture 319(3):315–318Google Scholar
  31. Khazandi M, Deo P, Ferro S et al (2017) Efficacy evaluation of a new water sanitizer for increasing the shelf life of Southern Australian King George whiting and Tasmanian Atlantic Salmon fillets. Food Microbiol 68:51–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim C, Hung YC, Brackett RE et al (2001) Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes, biofilms by electrolyzed oxidizing water. J Food Process Preserv 25(2):91–100Google Scholar
  33. Kim WT, Lim YS, Shin IS et al (2006) Use of electrolyzed water ice for preserving freshness of pacific saury (cololabis saira). J Food Prot 69(9):2199–2204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Klausen M, Heydorn A, Ragas P, Lambertsen L et al (2003) Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants. Mol Microbiol 48:1511–1524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Koo H, Falsetta ML, Klein MI (2013) The exopolysaccharide matrix a virulence determinant of cariogenic biofilm. J Dent Res 92(12):1065–1073PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar CG, Anand SK (1998) Significance of microbial biofilms in food industry: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 42(1):9–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenz CA, Kai R, Knorr D et al (2015) High pressure thermal inactivation of clostridium botulinum type e endospores—kinetic modeling and mechanistic insights. Front Microbiol 6:652PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Li G (2016) Sterilization process of slightly acidic electrolyzed water in the purification of Japanese Scallop. Guangdong Ocean UniversityGoogle Scholar
  39. Li JB, Lin T, Liao C et al (2013) Effect of physicochemical properties of electrolyzed water ice on inactivation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus during storage. J Food Sci Biotechnol 32(11):1169–1175Google Scholar
  40. Lin T, Wang JJ, Li JB et al (2013a) Use of acidic electrolyzed water ice for preserving the quality of shrimp. J Agric Food Chem 61(36):8695–8702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin T, Wang JJ, Pan YJ et al (2013b) Comparison of the bacterial activity of acidic electrolyzed water against foodborne pathogenic bacteria in pure culture and foods. Food Sci 34(15):69–74Google Scholar
  42. Liu SY, Liu JR, Ma YS (2014) Analysis of intestinal microflora in all stages of the live delivery of Scallop. Fish Sci 33(10):000626–630Google Scholar
  43. Mccarthy S (2012) Efficacy of electrolyzed oxidizing water against Listeria monocytogenes and Morganella morganii on conveyor belt and raw fish surfaces. Food Control 24(1–2):214–219Google Scholar
  44. Mikš-Krajnik M, Feng LX, Bang WS et al (2016) Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes, and natural microbiota on raw salmon fillets using acidic electrolyzed water, ultraviolet light or/and ultrasounds. Food Control 74:54–60Google Scholar
  45. Novotny L, Dvorska L, Lorencova A et al (2004) Fish: a potential source of bacterial pathogens for human beings: a review. Veterinární Medicína 49(9):343–358Google Scholar
  46. Park SY, Ha SD (2015) Reduction of Escherichia coli, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, counts on freshly sliced shad (Konosirus punctatus) by combined treatment of slightly acidic electrolyzed water and ultrasound using response surface methodology. Food Bioprocess Technol 8(8):1762–1770Google Scholar
  47. Phuvasate S, Su YC (2010) Effects of electrolyzed oxidizing water and ice treatments on reducing histamine-producing bacteria on fish skin and food contact surface. Food Control 21(3):286–291Google Scholar
  48. Ray B, Bhunia R (2004) Fundamental food microbiology. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  49. Sevenich R, Bark F, Kleinstueck E, Crews C et al (2015) The impact of high pressure thermal sterilization on the microbiological stability and formation of food processing contaminants in selected fish systems and baby food puree at pilot scale. Food Control 50:539–547Google Scholar
  50. Stoodley P, Sauer K, Costerton Davies DG et al (2002) Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Ann Rev Microbiol 56:187–209Google Scholar
  51. Sun JL, Zhang SK, Chen JY et al (2012) Efficacy of acidic and basic electrolyzed water in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. Can J Microbiol 58(4):448–454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sun JP, Zhao L, Yu WY et al (2017) Effect of acidic electrolyzed water on polyphenoloxidase from Litopenaeus vannamei. Food Sci 39(9):7–12Google Scholar
  53. Vázquez-Sánchez D, Cabo ML, Ibusquiza PS et al (2014) Biofilm-forming ability and resistance to industrial disinfectants of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from fishery products. Food Control 39:8–16Google Scholar
  54. Wang JJ, Zhang ZH, Li JB et al (2014a) Modeling Vibrio parahaemolyticus inactivation by acidic electrolyzed water on cooked shrimp using response surface methodology. Food Control 36(1):273–279Google Scholar
  55. Wang JJ, Sun WS, Jin MT et al (2014b) Fate of Vibrio parahaemolyticus on shrimp after acidic electrolyzed water treatment. Int J Food Microbiol 179(22):50–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang JJ, Lin T, Li JB et al (2014c) Effect of acidic electrolyzed water ice on quality of shrimp in dark condition. Food Control 35(1):207–212Google Scholar
  57. Wang M, Wang JJ, Sun XH et al (2015a) Preliminary mechanism of acidic electrolyzed water ice on improving the quality and safety of shrimp. Food Chem 176:333–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang XL, Li YQ, Li QG et al (2015b) Research on spatial-temporal aggregation of China’s environment pollution and food safety: the interaction between emergency environmental accidents and foodborne disease outbreaks. China’s Population, Res Environ 25(12):53–61Google Scholar
  59. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD, Dowd SE (2008) Biofilms and chronic wound inflammation. J wound care 17(8):333–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu Y, Wen J, Ma Y et al (2014) Epidemiology of foodborne disease outbreaks caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus, china, 2003–2008. Food Control 46(46):197–202Google Scholar
  61. Xiao J, Klein MI, Falsetta ML et al (2012) The exopolysaccharide matrix modulates the interaction between 3D architecture and virulence of a mixed-species oral biofilm. PLoS Pathogen 8(4):e1002623Google Scholar
  62. Xie J, Sun XH, Pan YJ et al (2012a) Combining basic electrolyzed water pretreatment and mild heat greatly enhanced the efficacy of acidic electrolyzed water against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, on shrimp. Food Control 23(2):320–324Google Scholar
  63. Xie J, Sun XH, Pan YJ et al (2012b) Physicochemical properties and bactericidal activities of acidic electrolyzed water used or stored at different temperatures on shrimp. Food Res Int 47(2):331–336Google Scholar
  64. Xuan XT, Fan YF, Ling JG et al (2017) Preservation of squid by slightly acidic electrolyzed water ice. Food Control 73:1483–1489Google Scholar
  65. Yao X, Zhao AJ, Du SP et al (2017) The effect of acid electrolysis water ice on the quality of small yellow croaker and the change of enzyme activity in muscle tissue. Food Sci 38(13):244–250Google Scholar
  66. Zhang CL, Chen X, Xia XD et al (2017) Viability assay of E. coli o157: h7 treated with electrolyzed oxidizing water using flow cytometry. Food Control 88:47–53Google Scholar
  67. Zeng XP, Tang WW, Ye GQ et al (2010) Studies on disinfection mechanism of electrolyzed oxidizing water on E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J Food Sci 75(5):M253–M260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang X, Wang H, Li N et al (2015) High CO2-modified atmosphere packaging for extension of shelf-life of chilled yellow-feather broiler meat: a special breed in asia. LWT—Food Sci Technol 64(2):1123–1129Google Scholar
  69. Zhao AJ, Wang M, Zhao F et al (2016) Application of acidic electrolyzed water ice in sterilization and preservation of shrimp. Modern Food Sci Technol 32(3):126–131, 245Google Scholar
  70. Zhou R, Liu Y, Xie J et al (2011) Effects of combined treatment of electrolysed water and chitosan on the quality attributes and myofibril degradation in farmed obscure puffer fish (takifugu obscurus) during refrigerated storage. Food Chem 129(4):1660–1666Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Zhaohuan Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pradeep K. Malakar
    • 1
  • Siqi Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Li Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Food Science and TechnologyShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and PreservationMinistry of AgricultureShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic-Product Processing and PreservationShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations